Letter: Association Between Viral Replication Activity and Postoperative Recurrence of HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma—Authors' Reply

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jiwon Yang, Won-Mook Choi
{"title":"Letter: Association Between Viral Replication Activity and Postoperative Recurrence of HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma—Authors' Reply","authors":"Jiwon Yang, Won-Mook Choi","doi":"10.1111/apt.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We appreciate the interest of Yang in our study [<span>1, 2</span>] on the association between viral replication activity and postoperative recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and we welcome the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of our study and address the points raised.</p>\n<p>First and foremost, we would like to clarify that patients who initiated antiviral therapy (AVT) more than 3 months after surgery were excluded in order to avoid immortal time bias. We agree that HBV viral activity is dynamic and that postoperative monitoring may provide additional prognostic information. However, our study specifically focused on the prognostic significance of preoperative baseline viral replication activity, which remains clinically relevant in many real-world settings where preoperative decisions must be made based on limited dynamic data. Furthermore, we consider that the ‘field effect’—potentially partially reflected by HBV DNA levels—may persist for a prolonged period even under AVT, thereby influencing hepatocarcinogenesis or recurrence [<span>3, 4</span>].</p>\n<p>Second, the primary purpose of our competing risk analysis was to account for death or liver transplantation as events that may preclude HCC recurrence and thereby influence outcomes. In this context, the occurrence of such competing events is what matters, rather than the evaluation of their specific causes [<span>5</span>].</p>\n<p>Third, we used imaging criteria in accordance with internationally accepted guidelines [<span>6, 7</span>], which have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, particularly in experienced centres. Given that the diagnosis of HCC is predominantly based on imaging rather than pathological confirmation, we find it difficult to agree that the absence of pathological confirmation for recurrence significantly compromises the reliability of our study results.</p>\n<p>Finally, to our knowledge, few studies have followed a large cohort of 2384 patients with very early- or early-stage HBV-related HCC for a median of 4.9 years. Considering the decreased risk of recurrence beyond 5 years post-surgery [<span>8</span>] and the gradual attenuation of the ‘field effect’ over time, we believe that both the sample size and follow-up duration are sufficient to support the validity of our study outcomes.</p>\n<p>We acknowledge the limitations inherent in a retrospective, non-confirmatory study, including the possibility of unmeasured confounding and residual bias, and agree that further research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We appreciate the interest of Yang in our study [1, 2] on the association between viral replication activity and postoperative recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and we welcome the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of our study and address the points raised.

First and foremost, we would like to clarify that patients who initiated antiviral therapy (AVT) more than 3 months after surgery were excluded in order to avoid immortal time bias. We agree that HBV viral activity is dynamic and that postoperative monitoring may provide additional prognostic information. However, our study specifically focused on the prognostic significance of preoperative baseline viral replication activity, which remains clinically relevant in many real-world settings where preoperative decisions must be made based on limited dynamic data. Furthermore, we consider that the ‘field effect’—potentially partially reflected by HBV DNA levels—may persist for a prolonged period even under AVT, thereby influencing hepatocarcinogenesis or recurrence [3, 4].

Second, the primary purpose of our competing risk analysis was to account for death or liver transplantation as events that may preclude HCC recurrence and thereby influence outcomes. In this context, the occurrence of such competing events is what matters, rather than the evaluation of their specific causes [5].

Third, we used imaging criteria in accordance with internationally accepted guidelines [6, 7], which have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, particularly in experienced centres. Given that the diagnosis of HCC is predominantly based on imaging rather than pathological confirmation, we find it difficult to agree that the absence of pathological confirmation for recurrence significantly compromises the reliability of our study results.

Finally, to our knowledge, few studies have followed a large cohort of 2384 patients with very early- or early-stage HBV-related HCC for a median of 4.9 years. Considering the decreased risk of recurrence beyond 5 years post-surgery [8] and the gradual attenuation of the ‘field effect’ over time, we believe that both the sample size and follow-up duration are sufficient to support the validity of our study outcomes.

We acknowledge the limitations inherent in a retrospective, non-confirmatory study, including the possibility of unmeasured confounding and residual bias, and agree that further research is warranted.

信函:病毒复制活性与hbv相关肝细胞癌术后复发之间的关系——作者回复
我们感谢Yang对我们研究病毒复制活性与乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)相关肝细胞癌(HCC)术后复发之间关系的兴趣[1,2],我们欢迎有机会澄清我们研究的某些方面并解决提出的问题。首先,我们想澄清的是,为了避免不朽的时间偏差,我们排除了术后3个月以上开始抗病毒治疗(AVT)的患者。我们同意HBV病毒活性是动态的,术后监测可以提供额外的预后信息。然而,我们的研究特别关注术前基线病毒复制活性的预后意义,这在许多现实世界的环境中仍然具有临床相关性,因为术前决策必须基于有限的动态数据。此外,我们认为“场效应”——可能部分由HBV DNA水平反映——即使在AVT下也可能持续较长时间,从而影响肝癌的发生或复发[3,4]。其次,我们的竞争风险分析的主要目的是将死亡或肝移植作为可能排除HCC复发的事件,从而影响结果。在这种情况下,重要的是发生这种相互竞争的事件,而不是对其具体原因的评估。第三,我们根据国际公认的指南[6,7]使用成像标准,这些标准已经证明了很高的诊断准确性,特别是在经验丰富的中心。鉴于HCC的诊断主要是基于影像学而不是病理证实,我们很难同意没有复发的病理证实会严重影响我们研究结果的可靠性。最后,据我们所知,很少有研究对2384例极早期或早期hbv相关HCC患者进行了中位数为4.9年的随访。考虑到术后5年以上的复发风险降低,以及随着时间的推移“场效应”逐渐衰减,我们认为样本量和随访时间足以支持我们研究结果的有效性。我们承认回顾性、非验证性研究存在固有的局限性,包括可能存在无法测量的混杂和残留偏倚,并同意有必要进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信