Infrared light stimulates the cochlea through a mechanical displacement detected and amplified by hair cells

IF 9.4 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Julien B. Azimzadeh, Patricia M. Quiñones, John S. Oghalai, Anthony J. Ricci
{"title":"Infrared light stimulates the cochlea through a mechanical displacement detected and amplified by hair cells","authors":"Julien B. Azimzadeh, Patricia M. Quiñones, John S. Oghalai, Anthony J. Ricci","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2422076122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although cochlear implants (CI) are the standard of care for profound sensorineural hearing loss they are technically constrained by the tendency of electrical current to spread within the fluid-filled chambers of the cochlea. This limits the resolution of individual electrodes and patients’ perceptions of complex sounds. Infrared irradiation has been proposed as an alternative to electrical stimulation because it can elicit auditory responses while being spatially constrained, theoretically promising higher-fidelity hearing for the deaf. However, conflicting reports locate the site of infrared excitation at spiral ganglia neurons or hair cells. We use a combination of genetic, pharmacological, optical, and electrophysiological tools to determine the site of action of infrared irradiation. Infrared-evoked cochlear potentials are composed of two peaks: one driven by hair cells (the microphonic) and a second driven by spiral ganglion neurons (the neural response). Manipulations that prevented hair cell synaptic activity abolished the neural component, while manipulations blocking hair cell mechanotransduction abolished all responses, suggesting a mechanical component to the infrared response. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed that infrared irradiation creates a mechanical stimulus that is both amplified and detected by hair cells. Because infrared irradiation does not stimulate spiral ganglion neurons directly, it is unlikely to replace the electrical CI.","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422076122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although cochlear implants (CI) are the standard of care for profound sensorineural hearing loss they are technically constrained by the tendency of electrical current to spread within the fluid-filled chambers of the cochlea. This limits the resolution of individual electrodes and patients’ perceptions of complex sounds. Infrared irradiation has been proposed as an alternative to electrical stimulation because it can elicit auditory responses while being spatially constrained, theoretically promising higher-fidelity hearing for the deaf. However, conflicting reports locate the site of infrared excitation at spiral ganglia neurons or hair cells. We use a combination of genetic, pharmacological, optical, and electrophysiological tools to determine the site of action of infrared irradiation. Infrared-evoked cochlear potentials are composed of two peaks: one driven by hair cells (the microphonic) and a second driven by spiral ganglion neurons (the neural response). Manipulations that prevented hair cell synaptic activity abolished the neural component, while manipulations blocking hair cell mechanotransduction abolished all responses, suggesting a mechanical component to the infrared response. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed that infrared irradiation creates a mechanical stimulus that is both amplified and detected by hair cells. Because infrared irradiation does not stimulate spiral ganglion neurons directly, it is unlikely to replace the electrical CI.
红外光通过毛细胞检测和放大的机械位移刺激耳蜗
虽然人工耳蜗(CI)是重度感音神经性听力损失的标准治疗方法,但由于电流在充满液体的耳蜗腔内扩散的趋势,它们在技术上受到限制。这限制了单个电极的分辨率和患者对复杂声音的感知。红外辐射被提议作为电刺激的替代方案,因为它可以在空间受限的情况下引发听觉反应,理论上有望为聋人提供更高保真度的听力。然而,相互矛盾的报道定位于螺旋神经节神经元或毛细胞的红外激发位点。我们使用遗传学、药理学、光学和电生理工具的组合来确定红外照射的作用部位。红外诱发的耳蜗电位由两个峰组成:一个由毛细胞(传声器)驱动,另一个由螺旋神经节神经元(神经反应)驱动。阻止毛细胞突触活动的操作消除了神经成分,而阻断毛细胞机械转导的操作消除了所有反应,表明红外反应有机械成分。光学相干断层扫描(OCT)证实,红外辐射产生了一种机械刺激,这种刺激被毛细胞放大并检测到。由于红外照射不直接刺激螺旋神经节神经元,因此不太可能取代电CI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信