A simplified frailty score predicts outcome in curatively treated older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Kjersti Lia,Rasmus Rask Kragh Jørgensen,Per Wikman,Bente L Wold,Ninja Övergaard,Øystein Fluge,Unn-Merete Fagerli,Hanne Bersvendsen,Idun B Bø,Sameer Bhargava,Daniel Molin,Alexander Fosså
{"title":"A simplified frailty score predicts outcome in curatively treated older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.","authors":"Kjersti Lia,Rasmus Rask Kragh Jørgensen,Per Wikman,Bente L Wold,Ninja Övergaard,Øystein Fluge,Unn-Merete Fagerli,Hanne Bersvendsen,Idun B Bø,Sameer Bhargava,Daniel Molin,Alexander Fosså","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2025.287509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have lower tolerance and inferior outcomes after standard chemotherapy regimens. To identify patient-derived indicators of frailty associated with outcome, we retrospectively analyzed patient and disease characteristics, treatment and outcome in a Norwegian population-based cohort of older (≥60 years) patients with cHL diagnosed 2000-2015. We included 279 patients (median age 69 years, range 60-90) treated with curative intent, defined as any typical cHL regimen with ≥50% standard doxorubicin dose in the first cycle. Treatment-related mortality was 8%, median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-9.3) and 8.7 years (95%CI 7.0-10.4), respectively, in the Norwegian cohort. Multivariable analyses identified patient-derived prognostic factors working independently of stage, histology and international prognostic score. We derived a frailty index ranging from 0-3 with one point each for age ≥70 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≥2 and a Cumulative illness rating scale in geriatrics score ≥8. Patients were categorized as fit (score 0, 34% of patients), unfit (score 1-2, 60%) and frail (score 3, 7%), with 5-year PFS of 74%, 49% and 11%, and 5-year OS of 86%, 52%, and 22% respectively. The proposed frailty score was validated in an external cohort of 792 similarly selected patients from the Swedish Lymphoma Register, where comorbidities were scored based on the Charlson comorbidity index (0-2 versus 3 or higher). In this comprehensive study, we develop a frailty score for elderly cHL patients to inform clinical decisions and prospective trials evaluating selective therapies for older patients.","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":"141 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2025.287509","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have lower tolerance and inferior outcomes after standard chemotherapy regimens. To identify patient-derived indicators of frailty associated with outcome, we retrospectively analyzed patient and disease characteristics, treatment and outcome in a Norwegian population-based cohort of older (≥60 years) patients with cHL diagnosed 2000-2015. We included 279 patients (median age 69 years, range 60-90) treated with curative intent, defined as any typical cHL regimen with ≥50% standard doxorubicin dose in the first cycle. Treatment-related mortality was 8%, median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-9.3) and 8.7 years (95%CI 7.0-10.4), respectively, in the Norwegian cohort. Multivariable analyses identified patient-derived prognostic factors working independently of stage, histology and international prognostic score. We derived a frailty index ranging from 0-3 with one point each for age ≥70 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≥2 and a Cumulative illness rating scale in geriatrics score ≥8. Patients were categorized as fit (score 0, 34% of patients), unfit (score 1-2, 60%) and frail (score 3, 7%), with 5-year PFS of 74%, 49% and 11%, and 5-year OS of 86%, 52%, and 22% respectively. The proposed frailty score was validated in an external cohort of 792 similarly selected patients from the Swedish Lymphoma Register, where comorbidities were scored based on the Charlson comorbidity index (0-2 versus 3 or higher). In this comprehensive study, we develop a frailty score for elderly cHL patients to inform clinical decisions and prospective trials evaluating selective therapies for older patients.
一种简化的衰弱评分预测经治疗的老年经典霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的预后。
经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)的老年患者在标准化疗方案后耐受性较低,预后较差。为了确定与结果相关的患者来源的虚弱指标,我们回顾性分析了挪威2000-2015年诊断为cHL的老年(≥60岁)患者的患者和疾病特征、治疗和结果。我们纳入了279例患者(中位年龄69岁,范围60-90岁),以治愈为目的进行治疗,定义为任何典型的cHL方案,第一周期的标准阿霉素剂量≥50%。在挪威队列中,治疗相关死亡率为8%,中位无进展(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为7.1年(95%可信区间[CI] 5.0-9.3)和8.7年(95%CI 7.0-10.4)。多变量分析确定了独立于分期、组织学和国际预后评分的患者预后因素。我们得出了年龄≥70岁的衰弱指数0-3分,每分1分,东部肿瘤合作组状态≥2分,老年病学评分≥8分的累积疾病评定量表。患者被分为适合(0,34%)、不适合(1- 2,60%)和虚弱(3,7%),5年PFS分别为74%、49%和11%,5年OS分别为86%、52%和22%。提出的虚弱评分在792名来自瑞典淋巴瘤登记处的相似选择的患者的外部队列中得到验证,其中合并症是根据Charlson合并症指数(0-2比3或更高)进行评分的。在这项综合研究中,我们为老年cHL患者制定了一个虚弱评分,以指导临床决策和评估老年患者选择性治疗的前瞻性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Haematologica
Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
349
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research. Scope: The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that: Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases. Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信