VALIDATION OF ESOPHAGEAL GLOBAL SYMPTOM SEVERITY AS A PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME FOR EVALUATION OF REFLUX SYMPTOMS.

Walter W Chan,Matthew Schroeder,Allyson Richardson,Neemit Shah,Mayssan Muftah,Samya Muftah,Stefano Siboni,Marco Sozzi,Ming-Wun Wong,Chien-Lin Chen,C Prakash Gyawali,
{"title":"VALIDATION OF ESOPHAGEAL GLOBAL SYMPTOM SEVERITY AS A PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME FOR EVALUATION OF REFLUX SYMPTOMS.","authors":"Walter W Chan,Matthew Schroeder,Allyson Richardson,Neemit Shah,Mayssan Muftah,Samya Muftah,Stefano Siboni,Marco Sozzi,Ming-Wun Wong,Chien-Lin Chen,C Prakash Gyawali,","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nVisual analog scales (VAS) are simple, easy for patients to comprehend, and require limited translation. We evaluated the value of esophageal global symptom severity (GSS) measured using VAS in assessing initial reflux symptom burden as compared to other validated questionnaires, esophageal symptom burden, and outcome following reflux management.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe analyzed pooled data from published historical cohorts of patients undergoing pH-impedance testing for reflux symptoms from three continents (North America, Europe, Asia). Univariate (Spearman correlation), multivariable (general linear regression) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to compare GSS with validated symptom instruments including gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ), GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL), and reflux symptom index (RSI), and metrics from pH-impedance monitoring per Lyon Consensus 2.0.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n1296 patients (mean age 52.0 years, 61.9% female) were included, 937, 197, and 162 from North America, Europe, and Asia, respectively. GSS significantly correlated with GERDQ (R=0.455), GERD-HRQL (R=0.440), RSI (R=0.491), acid exposure time (AET) (R=0.158), and total reflux episodes (R=0.161) (p<0.0001 for each comparison). Mean GSS was higher with abnormal GERDQ, GERD-HRQL, and RSI, pathologic AET and conclusive GERD per Lyon Consensus (p<0.0001 each comparison). On ROC analyses, GSS was non-inferior to GERDQ, GERD-HRQL, and RSI in predicting pathologic AET and total reflux episodes, and conclusive GERD. Percentage improvement in GSS after antireflux treatment significantly correlated with change in GERDQ (R=0.536, p<0.0001) and treatment satisfaction (R=0.532 p=0.0002). On multivariable linear regression analyses, percentage change in GSS remained an independent predictor of both change in GERDQ (β=0.813, p<0.0001) and satisfaction with anti-reflux therapy (β=1.90, p=0.0006).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nGSS correlates with other validated reflux questionnaires and discriminates abnormal from normal reflux burden in patients with reflux symptoms. GSS change also reflects reflux treatment outcome and satisfaction. GSS is a useful addition to patient symptom assessment before and after GERD treatment.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Visual analog scales (VAS) are simple, easy for patients to comprehend, and require limited translation. We evaluated the value of esophageal global symptom severity (GSS) measured using VAS in assessing initial reflux symptom burden as compared to other validated questionnaires, esophageal symptom burden, and outcome following reflux management. METHODS We analyzed pooled data from published historical cohorts of patients undergoing pH-impedance testing for reflux symptoms from three continents (North America, Europe, Asia). Univariate (Spearman correlation), multivariable (general linear regression) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to compare GSS with validated symptom instruments including gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ), GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL), and reflux symptom index (RSI), and metrics from pH-impedance monitoring per Lyon Consensus 2.0. RESULTS 1296 patients (mean age 52.0 years, 61.9% female) were included, 937, 197, and 162 from North America, Europe, and Asia, respectively. GSS significantly correlated with GERDQ (R=0.455), GERD-HRQL (R=0.440), RSI (R=0.491), acid exposure time (AET) (R=0.158), and total reflux episodes (R=0.161) (p<0.0001 for each comparison). Mean GSS was higher with abnormal GERDQ, GERD-HRQL, and RSI, pathologic AET and conclusive GERD per Lyon Consensus (p<0.0001 each comparison). On ROC analyses, GSS was non-inferior to GERDQ, GERD-HRQL, and RSI in predicting pathologic AET and total reflux episodes, and conclusive GERD. Percentage improvement in GSS after antireflux treatment significantly correlated with change in GERDQ (R=0.536, p<0.0001) and treatment satisfaction (R=0.532 p=0.0002). On multivariable linear regression analyses, percentage change in GSS remained an independent predictor of both change in GERDQ (β=0.813, p<0.0001) and satisfaction with anti-reflux therapy (β=1.90, p=0.0006). CONCLUSIONS GSS correlates with other validated reflux questionnaires and discriminates abnormal from normal reflux burden in patients with reflux symptoms. GSS change also reflects reflux treatment outcome and satisfaction. GSS is a useful addition to patient symptom assessment before and after GERD treatment.
食道总体症状严重程度作为患者报告的评估反流症状的结果的验证。
视觉模拟量表(VAS)简单,易于患者理解,并且需要有限的翻译。我们评估了使用VAS测量的食管总体症状严重程度(GSS)在评估初始反流症状负担方面的价值,并与其他有效问卷、食管症状负担和反流治疗后的结果进行了比较。方法:我们分析了来自三大洲(北美、欧洲、亚洲)接受ph阻抗测试的反流症状患者的已发表的历史队列数据。进行单因素(Spearman相关)、多变量(一般线性回归)和受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,将GSS与经过验证的症状工具进行比较,包括胃食管反流疾病问卷(GERDQ)、胃食管反流健康相关生活质量(GERD- hrql)和反流症状指数(RSI),以及根据Lyon Consensus 2.0进行的ph -阻抗监测指标。结果共纳入1296例患者(平均年龄52.0岁,女性61.9%),分别来自北美、欧洲和亚洲的937例、197例和162例。GSS与GERDQ (R=0.455)、GERD-HRQL (R=0.440)、RSI (R=0.491)、酸暴露时间(AET) (R=0.158)和总反流发作(R=0.161)显著相关(各比较p<0.0001)。GERDQ、GERD- hrql、RSI、病理性AET和结论性GERD异常的平均GSS更高(每项比较p<0.0001)。在ROC分析中,GSS在预测病理性AET和总反流发作以及结论性GERD方面不逊于GERDQ、GERD- hrql和RSI。抗反流治疗后GSS改善百分比与GERDQ变化(R=0.536, p<0.0001)和治疗满意度(R=0.532 p=0.0002)显著相关。在多变量线性回归分析中,GSS百分比变化仍然是GERDQ变化(β=0.813, p<0.0001)和抗反流治疗满意度(β=1.90, p=0.0006)的独立预测因子。结论sgss与其他有效的反流问卷相关,可区分反流症状患者的异常反流负担和正常反流负担。GSS的变化也反映了反流治疗的结果和满意度。GSS是对胃反流治疗前后患者症状评估的有用补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信