Sex differences in the executive and behavioral reserve of autosomal dominant frontotemporal dementia

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jesús Garcia Castro, Sara Rubio-Guerra, Kaitlin B. Casaletto, Judit Selma González, Molly Memel, Lídia Vaqué-Alcázar, Alejandra Morcillo-Nieto, José Arriola-Infante, Oriol Dols-Icardo, Alexandre Bejanin, Olivia Belbin, Juan Fortea, Daniel Alcolea, Maria Carmona-Iragui, Isabel Barroeta, Miguel Santos-Santos, María Belen Sánchez Saudinós, Isabel Sala Matavera, Hilary W. Heuer, Leah K. Forsberg, Kejal Kantarci, Adam M. Staffaroni, Carmela Tartaglia, Katherine P. Rankin, Brad Boeve, Adam Boxer, Howard J. Rosen, Alberto Lleó, Ignacio Illán-Gala, for the ALLFTD Consortium
{"title":"Sex differences in the executive and behavioral reserve of autosomal dominant frontotemporal dementia","authors":"Jesús Garcia Castro,&nbsp;Sara Rubio-Guerra,&nbsp;Kaitlin B. Casaletto,&nbsp;Judit Selma González,&nbsp;Molly Memel,&nbsp;Lídia Vaqué-Alcázar,&nbsp;Alejandra Morcillo-Nieto,&nbsp;José Arriola-Infante,&nbsp;Oriol Dols-Icardo,&nbsp;Alexandre Bejanin,&nbsp;Olivia Belbin,&nbsp;Juan Fortea,&nbsp;Daniel Alcolea,&nbsp;Maria Carmona-Iragui,&nbsp;Isabel Barroeta,&nbsp;Miguel Santos-Santos,&nbsp;María Belen Sánchez Saudinós,&nbsp;Isabel Sala Matavera,&nbsp;Hilary W. Heuer,&nbsp;Leah K. Forsberg,&nbsp;Kejal Kantarci,&nbsp;Adam M. Staffaroni,&nbsp;Carmela Tartaglia,&nbsp;Katherine P. Rankin,&nbsp;Brad Boeve,&nbsp;Adam Boxer,&nbsp;Howard J. Rosen,&nbsp;Alberto Lleó,&nbsp;Ignacio Illán-Gala,&nbsp;for the ALLFTD Consortium","doi":"10.1002/alz.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Self-reported sex influences brain resilience, but its role in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed 394 genetic-FTD patients and 279 controls from the ALLFTD consortium, assessing annual neuropsychological performance and MRI-based cortical thickness. Clinical characteristics and cortical thickness were compared between sexes. We used the residuals of linear regression models, which predict each participant's cognitive and behavioral performance levels relative to cortical thickness, as a proxy for reserve. We then modeled sex differences in longitudinal trajectories with linear mixed-effects models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Symptomatic females with genetic FTD had lower frontal cortical thickness than males, and the <i>C9orf72</i> subgroup showed lower-than-expected frontal cortical thickness for a given level of executive functioning. Differences in cognitive reserve between sexes peaked near symptom onset but diminished thereafter.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Females with genetic FTD showed higher cognitive reserve than males, suggesting that self-reported sex modulates resilience to frontotemporal neurodegeneration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Females with genetic FTD showed higher cognitive reserve than males.</li>\n \n <li>Those differences were particularly pronounced in the <i>C9orf72</i> and <i>GRN</i> subgroups.</li>\n \n <li>The higher cognitive reserve in females declined as the disease progressed.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Self-reported sex influences brain resilience, but its role in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed 394 genetic-FTD patients and 279 controls from the ALLFTD consortium, assessing annual neuropsychological performance and MRI-based cortical thickness. Clinical characteristics and cortical thickness were compared between sexes. We used the residuals of linear regression models, which predict each participant's cognitive and behavioral performance levels relative to cortical thickness, as a proxy for reserve. We then modeled sex differences in longitudinal trajectories with linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Symptomatic females with genetic FTD had lower frontal cortical thickness than males, and the C9orf72 subgroup showed lower-than-expected frontal cortical thickness for a given level of executive functioning. Differences in cognitive reserve between sexes peaked near symptom onset but diminished thereafter.

DISCUSSION

Females with genetic FTD showed higher cognitive reserve than males, suggesting that self-reported sex modulates resilience to frontotemporal neurodegeneration.

Highlights

  • Females with genetic FTD showed higher cognitive reserve than males.
  • Those differences were particularly pronounced in the C9orf72 and GRN subgroups.
  • The higher cognitive reserve in females declined as the disease progressed.

Abstract Image

常染色体显性额颞叶痴呆的执行和行为储备的性别差异
自我报告的性别影响大脑恢复力,但其在遗传性额颞叶痴呆(FTD)中的作用尚不清楚。方法:我们分析了来自ALLFTD联盟的394名遗传性ftd患者和279名对照,评估年度神经心理学表现和基于mri的皮质厚度。性别间临床特征及皮质厚度比较。我们使用线性回归模型的残差来预测每个参与者相对于皮质厚度的认知和行为表现水平,作为储备的代理。然后,我们用线性混合效应模型模拟纵向轨迹中的性别差异。结果有症状的遗传性FTD女性的额叶皮质厚度低于男性,C9orf72亚组在给定执行功能水平下的额叶皮质厚度低于预期。两性之间的认知储备差异在症状出现时达到顶峰,但此后逐渐减弱。患有遗传性FTD的女性比男性表现出更高的认知储备,这表明自我报告的性别调节了对额颞叶神经退行性变的恢复能力。具有遗传性FTD的女性比男性表现出更高的认知储备。这些差异在C9orf72和GRN亚组中尤为明显。女性较高的认知储备随着疾病的进展而下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信