Application of Donabedian Three-Dimensional Model in Outpatient Care Quality: A Scoping Review

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Jinrong Yang, Fan Liu, Chunxia Yang, Jingyi Wei, Yonghong Ma, Lisheng Xu, Jingying Xie, Jingjun Wang
{"title":"Application of Donabedian Three-Dimensional Model in Outpatient Care Quality: A Scoping Review","authors":"Jinrong Yang,&nbsp;Fan Liu,&nbsp;Chunxia Yang,&nbsp;Jingyi Wei,&nbsp;Yonghong Ma,&nbsp;Lisheng Xu,&nbsp;Jingying Xie,&nbsp;Jingjun Wang","doi":"10.1155/jonm/6893336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> The mobility of outpatients, frequent treatment sessions, and varying illness severity challenge nursing care and hinder quality improvement efforts. The Donabedian model effectively evaluates nursing quality and is widely used in operating rooms, intensive care units and oncology wards. However, its application in outpatient nursing remains unclear.</p>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> To overview the Donabedian model’s application in outpatient care quality.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, adhering to PRISMA-ScR. Searches for eligible papers were performed on PubMed, OVID, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, CBM, and Wan Fang in June 2024. Data were analyzed narratively using an inductive approach, with visual mapping done through ArcGIS and Origin.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 18 studies were included in the review. Literature review, Delphi and semistructured interview were widely used in the mixed method studies. The primary settings involved dental clinics and health examination centers, followed by traditional Chinese medicine clinics and pediatric clinics. The studies spanned various regions: 2 in Canada, 3 in Germany, and 13 in China. Structural indicators evaluate outpatient care systems and resources, while process indicators emphasize specialty nursing practice, safety, infection control, and humanistic care. Satisfaction, adverse events, and quality care serve as key secondary indicators for outcome assessment.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The research on outpatient care quality based on the Donabedian model is primarily mixed, with a need to expand interventional and qualitative studies. The structure-process-outcome quality indicators have varying focuses that require further verification and coordination. Structural indicators offer more policy and resource support, while process indicators differ across outpatient specialties, leading to heterogeneous specialist nursing practice metrics. Satisfaction and adverse events are crucial components in evaluating outpatient nursing quality outcomes.</p>\n <p><b>Implications for Nursing Management:</b> The application of the Donabedian model offers care managers practical ideas and references for outpatient care quality improvement.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Management","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jonm/6893336","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/6893336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The mobility of outpatients, frequent treatment sessions, and varying illness severity challenge nursing care and hinder quality improvement efforts. The Donabedian model effectively evaluates nursing quality and is widely used in operating rooms, intensive care units and oncology wards. However, its application in outpatient nursing remains unclear.

Aim: To overview the Donabedian model’s application in outpatient care quality.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, adhering to PRISMA-ScR. Searches for eligible papers were performed on PubMed, OVID, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, CBM, and Wan Fang in June 2024. Data were analyzed narratively using an inductive approach, with visual mapping done through ArcGIS and Origin.

Results: A total of 18 studies were included in the review. Literature review, Delphi and semistructured interview were widely used in the mixed method studies. The primary settings involved dental clinics and health examination centers, followed by traditional Chinese medicine clinics and pediatric clinics. The studies spanned various regions: 2 in Canada, 3 in Germany, and 13 in China. Structural indicators evaluate outpatient care systems and resources, while process indicators emphasize specialty nursing practice, safety, infection control, and humanistic care. Satisfaction, adverse events, and quality care serve as key secondary indicators for outcome assessment.

Conclusions: The research on outpatient care quality based on the Donabedian model is primarily mixed, with a need to expand interventional and qualitative studies. The structure-process-outcome quality indicators have varying focuses that require further verification and coordination. Structural indicators offer more policy and resource support, while process indicators differ across outpatient specialties, leading to heterogeneous specialist nursing practice metrics. Satisfaction and adverse events are crucial components in evaluating outpatient nursing quality outcomes.

Implications for Nursing Management: The application of the Donabedian model offers care managers practical ideas and references for outpatient care quality improvement.

Abstract Image

Donabedian三维模型在门诊服务质量中的应用:一个范围综述
背景:门诊病人流动性大、治疗次数频繁、病情严重程度不同,这些都给护理工作带来了挑战,阻碍了质量改进工作的开展。唐纳贝迪安模式能有效评估护理质量,被广泛应用于手术室、重症监护室和肿瘤病房。然而,其在门诊护理中的应用仍不明确。 目的:概述多纳比安模式在门诊护理质量中的应用。 方法采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架并遵循 PRISMA-ScR 进行范围界定综述。于 2024 年 6 月在 PubMed、OVID、Web of Science、Embase、CNKI、CBM 和 Wan Fang 上对符合条件的论文进行了检索。采用归纳法对数据进行叙述式分析,并通过 ArcGIS 和 Origin 绘制可视化地图。 结果:共有 18 项研究被纳入综述。文献综述、德尔菲法和半结构式访谈被广泛应用于混合方法研究中。主要研究地点包括牙科诊所和体检中心,其次是中医诊所和儿科诊所。这些研究跨越不同地区:加拿大 2 项,德国 3 项,中国 13 项。结构指标评估门诊护理系统和资源,过程指标强调专科护理实践、安全、感染控制和人文关怀。满意度、不良事件和优质护理是结果评估的关键二级指标。 结论:基于多纳比德模式的门诊护理质量研究主要是混合研究,需要扩大干预性和定性研究。结构-过程-结果质量指标各有侧重,需要进一步验证和协调。结构指标提供更多的政策和资源支持,而过程指标则因门诊专科而异,导致专科护理实践指标的异质性。满意度和不良事件是评估门诊护理质量结果的重要组成部分。 对护理管理的启示:多纳比德模型的应用为护理管理者提供了门诊护理质量改进的实用思路和参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
14.50%
发文量
377
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Management is an international forum which informs and advances the discipline of nursing management and leadership. The Journal encourages scholarly debate and critical analysis resulting in a rich source of evidence which underpins and illuminates the practice of management, innovation and leadership in nursing and health care. It publishes current issues and developments in practice in the form of research papers, in-depth commentaries and analyses. The complex and rapidly changing nature of global health care is constantly generating new challenges and questions. The Journal of Nursing Management welcomes papers from researchers, academics, practitioners, managers, and policy makers from a range of countries and backgrounds which examine these issues and contribute to the body of knowledge in international nursing management and leadership worldwide. The Journal of Nursing Management aims to: -Inform practitioners and researchers in nursing management and leadership -Explore and debate current issues in nursing management and leadership -Assess the evidence for current practice -Develop best practice in nursing management and leadership -Examine the impact of policy developments -Address issues in governance, quality and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信