Evaluatıon of Depressıon and Anxıety Status in Patıents After Cardıac Devıce Implantatıon

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS

Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1111/anec.70085

Murat Özmen, Onur Altunkaya, Selim Aydemir, Sidar Şiyar Aydın, Faruk Aydınyılmaz, Emrah Aksakal, Emre Alkan

{"title":"Evaluatıon of Depressıon and Anxıety Status in Patıents After Cardıac Devıce Implantatıon","authors":"Murat Özmen, Onur Altunkaya, Selim Aydemir, Sidar Şiyar Aydın, Faruk Aydınyılmaz, Emrah Aksakal, Emre Alkan","doi":"10.1111/anec.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and pacemaker (PM) implantation may lead to anxiety and depression, which may reduce patients' quality of life. The aim of our study was to compare depression and anxiety following device implantation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective study was conducted on 202 patients admitted to our hospital with ICD and PM implants between January 2024 and January 2025.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of anxiety in PM and ICD recipients was 25.9% and 38.8%, respectively. There was a significant difference in anxiety in ICD patients (< 0.001). In terms of depression, the results in the PM and ICD groups were 18.9 and 38.9, respectively. The results showed a significant difference in the prevalence of depression between PM and ICD recipients. The tendency toward depression was statistically significant in both device recipients (PM; <i>p</i> = 0.008, ICD; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Considering the prevalence of anxiety and depression, it seems necessary to pay closer attention to the anxiety and depression states of patients who have been treated with PM and ICD devices and to provide more widespread education to these patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8074,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anec.70085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anec.70085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and pacemaker (PM) implantation may lead to anxiety and depression, which may reduce patients' quality of life. The aim of our study was to compare depression and anxiety following device implantation.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted on 202 patients admitted to our hospital with ICD and PM implants between January 2024 and January 2025.

Results

The prevalence of anxiety in PM and ICD recipients was 25.9% and 38.8%, respectively. There was a significant difference in anxiety in ICD patients (< 0.001). In terms of depression, the results in the PM and ICD groups were 18.9 and 38.9, respectively. The results showed a significant difference in the prevalence of depression between PM and ICD recipients. The tendency toward depression was statistically significant in both device recipients (PM; p = 0.008, ICD; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Considering the prevalence of anxiety and depression, it seems necessary to pay closer attention to the anxiety and depression states of patients who have been treated with PM and ICD devices and to provide more widespread education to these patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

“Depressıon”中的“Evaluatıon”和“Anxıety”中的“Patıents”中的“状态”

导言植入式心律转复除颤器（ICD）和起搏器（PM）可能会导致焦虑和抑郁，从而降低患者的生活质量。我们的研究旨在比较植入设备后的抑郁和焦虑情况。方法对 2024 年 1 月至 2025 年 1 月期间本院收治的 202 名植入 ICD 和 PM 的患者进行了前瞻性研究。结果 PM 和 ICD 患者的焦虑发生率分别为 25.9% 和 38.8%。ICD 患者的焦虑程度有明显差异（< 0.001）。在抑郁方面，PM 组和 ICD 组的结果分别为 18.9% 和 38.9%。结果显示，PM 和 ICD 患者的抑郁症患病率存在明显差异。在统计学上，两种设备的接受者都有抑郁倾向（PM；p = 0.008，ICD；p < 0.001）。结论考虑到焦虑和抑郁的普遍性，似乎有必要更加密切地关注接受 PM 和 ICD 装置治疗的患者的焦虑和抑郁状态，并向这些患者提供更广泛的教育。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology 医学-心血管系统

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY (A.N.E) is an online only journal that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. ANE is the first journal in an evolving subspecialty that incorporates ongoing advances in the clinical application and technology of traditional and new ECG-based techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac patients. The publication includes topics related to 12-lead, exercise and high-resolution electrocardiography, arrhythmias, ischemia, repolarization phenomena, heart rate variability, circadian rhythms, bioengineering technology, signal-averaged ECGs, T-wave alternans and automatic external defibrillation. ANE publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of noninvasive electrocardiology. Original research, clinical studies, state-of-the-art reviews, case reports, technical notes, and letters to the editors will be published to meet future demands in this field.