The Effect of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide and Riboside on Skeletal Muscle Mass and Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Konstantinos Prokopidis, Frank Moriarty, Gülistan Bahat, Joseph McLean, David D. Church, Harnish P. Patel
{"title":"The Effect of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide and Riboside on Skeletal Muscle Mass and Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Konstantinos Prokopidis,&nbsp;Frank Moriarty,&nbsp;Gülistan Bahat,&nbsp;Joseph McLean,&nbsp;David D. Church,&nbsp;Harnish P. Patel","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Sarcopenia is associated with the loss of skeletal muscle function and mass. Nicotinamide precursors, such as nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) and nicotinamide riboside (NR), have received attention for their potential to improve NAD<sup>+</sup> levels and mitigate age-related sarcopenia in preliminary models, though evidence on their effects in older adults remains inconclusive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing NR or NMN vs. placebo. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed to determine their impact on measures of sarcopenia such as skeletal muscle index (SMI), handgrip strength (HGS) and gait speed. A narrative synthesis was used for 5-time chair stand test (5CST), short physical performance battery (SPPB), timed-up-and-go (TUG), 6-min walking distance (6MWD), leg and chest press 80% 1RM (repetition maximum) and thigh muscle mass.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Included participants had a mean age range from 60.9 to 83 years. NMN supplementation showed no significant effects on SMI (<i>n</i> = 3; mean difference (MD): −0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.99 – 0.14, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 63%, <i>p</i> = 0.14), HGS (One study estimating left grip; <i>n</i> = 5; MD: 0.61, 95%CI: −0.89 – 2.10, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.42; One study estimating right grip; <i>n</i> = 5; MD: 0.45, 95%CI: −1.06 – 1.96, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.56), gait speed (<i>n</i> = 4; MD: -0.01, 95%CI: −0.08 – 0.06, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.79), or 5CST (<i>n</i> = 2; MD: -0.21, 95%CI: −0.70 – 0.29, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 11%, <i>p</i> = 0.41). Additionally, our narrative synthesis showed that NMN did not improve knee extension strength, SPPB, or thigh muscle mass. NR supplementation was associated with a longer 6MWD among individuals with peripheral artery disease. However, lower scores in the SPPB and slower 5CST were observed in those with mild cognitive impairment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Current evidence does not support NMN and NR supplementation for preserving muscle mass and function in adults with mean age of over 60 years. Future research should explore supplementation dosage, NAD<sup>+</sup> baseline deficiency, and combined interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcsm.13799","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Sarcopenia is associated with the loss of skeletal muscle function and mass. Nicotinamide precursors, such as nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) and nicotinamide riboside (NR), have received attention for their potential to improve NAD+ levels and mitigate age-related sarcopenia in preliminary models, though evidence on their effects in older adults remains inconclusive.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing NR or NMN vs. placebo. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed to determine their impact on measures of sarcopenia such as skeletal muscle index (SMI), handgrip strength (HGS) and gait speed. A narrative synthesis was used for 5-time chair stand test (5CST), short physical performance battery (SPPB), timed-up-and-go (TUG), 6-min walking distance (6MWD), leg and chest press 80% 1RM (repetition maximum) and thigh muscle mass.

Results

Included participants had a mean age range from 60.9 to 83 years. NMN supplementation showed no significant effects on SMI (n = 3; mean difference (MD): −0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.99 – 0.14, I2 = 63%, p = 0.14), HGS (One study estimating left grip; n = 5; MD: 0.61, 95%CI: −0.89 – 2.10, I2 = 0%, p = 0.42; One study estimating right grip; n = 5; MD: 0.45, 95%CI: −1.06 – 1.96, I2 = 0%, p = 0.56), gait speed (n = 4; MD: -0.01, 95%CI: −0.08 – 0.06, I2 = 0%, p = 0.79), or 5CST (n = 2; MD: -0.21, 95%CI: −0.70 – 0.29, I2 = 11%, p = 0.41). Additionally, our narrative synthesis showed that NMN did not improve knee extension strength, SPPB, or thigh muscle mass. NR supplementation was associated with a longer 6MWD among individuals with peripheral artery disease. However, lower scores in the SPPB and slower 5CST were observed in those with mild cognitive impairment.

Conclusions

Current evidence does not support NMN and NR supplementation for preserving muscle mass and function in adults with mean age of over 60 years. Future research should explore supplementation dosage, NAD+ baseline deficiency, and combined interventions.

Abstract Image

烟酰胺单核苷酸和核苷对骨骼肌质量和功能的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
骨骼肌减少症与骨骼肌功能和质量的丧失有关。烟酰胺前体,如烟酰胺单核苷酸(NMN)和烟酰胺核苷(NR),因其在初步模型中改善NAD+水平和减轻年龄相关性肌肉减少症的潜力而受到关注,尽管其在老年人中的作用证据仍不确定。方法检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Scopus,确定随机对照试验(rct),比较NR或NMN与安慰剂。采用随机效应荟萃分析来确定它们对骨骼肌指数(SMI)、握力(HGS)和步态速度等肌肉减少症指标的影响。5次椅立测试(5CST)、短时间体能测试(SPPB)、计时起身(TUG)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、腿部和胸部按压80% 1RM(最大重复次数)和大腿肌肉量采用叙事综合法。研究对象的平均年龄在60.9岁到83岁之间。补充NMN对重度精神分裂症无显著影响(n = 3;平均差(MD): - 0.42, 95%可信区间(CI): - 0.99 - 0.14, I2 = 63%, p = 0.14), HGS(一项研究估计左握力;n = 5;MD: 0.61, 95%置信区间ci:−0.89 - 2.10,I2 = 0%, p = 0.42;一项研究估计正确握持;n = 5;MD: 0.45, 95%置信区间ci:−1.06 - 1.96,I2 = 0%, p = 0.56),步速(n = 4;MD: -0.01, 95%置信区间ci:−0.08 - 0.06,I2 = 0%, p = 0.79),或者5春秋国旅(n = 2;MD: -0.21, 95%置信区间ci:−0.70 - 0.29,I2 = 11%, p = 0.41)。此外,我们的叙述性综合研究表明,NMN并没有改善膝关节伸展强度、SPPB或大腿肌肉质量。外周动脉疾病患者补充NR与延长6MWD相关。然而,轻度认知障碍患者的SPPB得分较低,5CST得分较慢。目前的证据不支持补充NMN和NR对平均年龄超过60岁的成年人保持肌肉质量和功能的作用。未来的研究应探讨补充剂量、NAD+基线缺乏症和联合干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
12.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to publishing materials related to cachexia and sarcopenia, as well as body composition and its physiological and pathophysiological changes across the lifespan and in response to various illnesses from all fields of life sciences. The journal aims to provide a reliable resource for professionals interested in related research or involved in the clinical care of affected patients, such as those suffering from AIDS, cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic lung disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney failure, rheumatoid arthritis, or sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信