Groundwater Quality Prediction Using Proximal Hyperspectral Sensing, GIS, and Machine Learning Algorithms

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hemant Raheja, Arun Goel, Mahesh Pal
{"title":"Groundwater Quality Prediction Using Proximal Hyperspectral Sensing, GIS, and Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"Hemant Raheja,&nbsp;Arun Goel,&nbsp;Mahesh Pal","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-07997-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The primary objective of the present study is to assess the suitability of groundwater for drinking purposes using the Water Quality Index (WQI), Geographic Information System (GIS), and proximal sensing techniques. For this purpose, 272 groundwater samples collected before and after the monsoon period were analyzed for various hydrochemical parameter concentrations. To explore the relationship between water spectral reflectance and WQI, a spectroradiometer was used to measure the reflectance of each sample under laboratory conditions. Four machine learning procedures i.e., Support Vector Regression (SVR), M5P, Random Forest (RF), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) were used to predict WQI using resampled spectral reflectance. The WQI analysis revealed that approximately 30% of the groundwater samples fell within the poor to extremely poor-quality category in both periods, while 55.88% (Pre-monsoon) and 55.14% (Post-monsoon) of samples were classified under moderate quality, indicating marginal suitability for drinking purposes. The spectral curves of WQI indicated a lower reflectance for water samples with lower WQI values, whereas higher reflectance values were associated with higher WQI values. Performance evaluation of machine learning models demonstrated that SVR outperformed M5P, RF, and GPR, achieving the highest Correlation Coefficient (CC = 0.9964) and the lowest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE = 7.0313 mg/L) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE = 3.5056 mg/L) in the training phase, while maintaining similar performance in the testing phase (CC = 0.9964, RMSE = 7.6748 mg/L, MAE = 4.0297 mg/L). These findings highlight the potential of integrating spectral reflectance with machine learning models for accurate groundwater quality assessment and spatial mapping.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07997-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of the present study is to assess the suitability of groundwater for drinking purposes using the Water Quality Index (WQI), Geographic Information System (GIS), and proximal sensing techniques. For this purpose, 272 groundwater samples collected before and after the monsoon period were analyzed for various hydrochemical parameter concentrations. To explore the relationship between water spectral reflectance and WQI, a spectroradiometer was used to measure the reflectance of each sample under laboratory conditions. Four machine learning procedures i.e., Support Vector Regression (SVR), M5P, Random Forest (RF), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) were used to predict WQI using resampled spectral reflectance. The WQI analysis revealed that approximately 30% of the groundwater samples fell within the poor to extremely poor-quality category in both periods, while 55.88% (Pre-monsoon) and 55.14% (Post-monsoon) of samples were classified under moderate quality, indicating marginal suitability for drinking purposes. The spectral curves of WQI indicated a lower reflectance for water samples with lower WQI values, whereas higher reflectance values were associated with higher WQI values. Performance evaluation of machine learning models demonstrated that SVR outperformed M5P, RF, and GPR, achieving the highest Correlation Coefficient (CC = 0.9964) and the lowest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE = 7.0313 mg/L) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE = 3.5056 mg/L) in the training phase, while maintaining similar performance in the testing phase (CC = 0.9964, RMSE = 7.6748 mg/L, MAE = 4.0297 mg/L). These findings highlight the potential of integrating spectral reflectance with machine learning models for accurate groundwater quality assessment and spatial mapping.

地下水质量预测使用近距离高光谱传感,GIS和机器学习算法
本研究的主要目的是利用水质指数(WQI)、地理信息系统(GIS)和近端传感技术评估地下水的饮用适宜性。为此,对季风期前后采集的272份地下水样本进行了各种水化学参数浓度分析。为了探索水的光谱反射率与WQI之间的关系,在实验室条件下,使用光谱辐射计测量了每个样品的反射率。采用支持向量回归(SVR)、M5P、随机森林(RF)和高斯过程回归(GPR)四种机器学习方法,利用重采样的光谱反射率预测WQI。WQI分析显示,在这两个时期,大约30%的地下水样本属于差至极差的质量类别,而55.88%(季风前)和55.14%(季风后)的样本被分类为中等质量,表明边际适合饮用。WQI的光谱曲线表明,WQI值越低的水样反射率越低,反射率越高的水样WQI值越高。机器学习模型的性能评估表明,SVR优于M5P、RF和GPR,在训练阶段实现了最高的相关系数(CC = 0.9964)、最低的均方根误差(RMSE = 7.0313 mg/L)和平均绝对误差(MAE = 3.5056 mg/L),而在测试阶段保持了相似的性能(CC = 0.9964, RMSE = 7.6748 mg/L, MAE = 4.0297 mg/L)。这些发现强调了将光谱反射率与机器学习模型相结合的潜力,可以用于准确的地下水质量评估和空间制图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信