{"title":"Stiffness Measurement of Flexure Hinge-Based Compliant Mechanisms by Utilizing the Nanoindentation Method","authors":"Chunxue Yi;Dayu Wei;Hu Huang;Zhi Xu;Hongwei Zhao","doi":"10.1109/TIM.2025.3560746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flexure hinge-based compliant mechanisms find extensive applications in micro/nano actuation, where their transmission characteristics are significantly affected by stiffness. Traditional theoretical analysis methods generally ignore some influences and overidealize the load and boundary conditions, making it challenging to accurately evaluate the actual stiffness of compliant mechanisms. To address this limitation, a nanoindentation method was proposed to experimentally measure the stiffness of flexure hinge-based compliant mechanisms. In this method, the compliant mechanism was placed under the sample, thereby introducing an additional frame compliance for the nanoindentation instrument. Via comparative analysis of the load-depth curves obtained with and without the compliant mechanism, the stiffness of compliant mechanism could be calculated. To validate the effectiveness of this method, three compliant mechanisms based on rectangular, circular, and V-shaped flexure hinges were designed. Their stiffnesses were evaluated by the matrix-based compliance modeling (MCM) method, the finite element simulation (FES) method, the proposed nanoindentation method, and the traditional method. In the comparison of these four methods, the nanoindentation method can accurately evaluate the stiffness of compliant mechanisms, and the uncertainty is less than 3%. Being different from the theoretical analysis, the proposed nanoindentation method serves as an experimental evaluation tool, and it allows for the direct measurement of the stiffness of compliant mechanisms after manufacturing. The instrumented measurement method also significantly reduces the effects of human error. This is of practical significance and scientific value for guiding the design of compliant mechanisms and predicting their transmission characteristics in-service.","PeriodicalId":13341,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement","volume":"74 ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10965594/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flexure hinge-based compliant mechanisms find extensive applications in micro/nano actuation, where their transmission characteristics are significantly affected by stiffness. Traditional theoretical analysis methods generally ignore some influences and overidealize the load and boundary conditions, making it challenging to accurately evaluate the actual stiffness of compliant mechanisms. To address this limitation, a nanoindentation method was proposed to experimentally measure the stiffness of flexure hinge-based compliant mechanisms. In this method, the compliant mechanism was placed under the sample, thereby introducing an additional frame compliance for the nanoindentation instrument. Via comparative analysis of the load-depth curves obtained with and without the compliant mechanism, the stiffness of compliant mechanism could be calculated. To validate the effectiveness of this method, three compliant mechanisms based on rectangular, circular, and V-shaped flexure hinges were designed. Their stiffnesses were evaluated by the matrix-based compliance modeling (MCM) method, the finite element simulation (FES) method, the proposed nanoindentation method, and the traditional method. In the comparison of these four methods, the nanoindentation method can accurately evaluate the stiffness of compliant mechanisms, and the uncertainty is less than 3%. Being different from the theoretical analysis, the proposed nanoindentation method serves as an experimental evaluation tool, and it allows for the direct measurement of the stiffness of compliant mechanisms after manufacturing. The instrumented measurement method also significantly reduces the effects of human error. This is of practical significance and scientific value for guiding the design of compliant mechanisms and predicting their transmission characteristics in-service.
基于挠性铰链的顺应机构广泛应用于微/纳米致动领域,其传动特性受刚度的影响很大。传统的理论分析方法通常会忽略一些影响因素,并将载荷和边界条件过度理想化,因此准确评估顺应机构的实际刚度具有挑战性。针对这一局限性,有人提出了一种纳米压痕法,用于实验测量基于挠性铰链的顺应机构的刚度。在该方法中,顺应机构被置于样品下方,从而为纳米压痕仪器引入了额外的框架顺应性。通过对有无顺应机构所获得的载荷-深度曲线进行比较分析,可以计算出顺应机构的刚度。为了验证这种方法的有效性,我们设计了三种基于矩形、圆形和 V 形弯曲铰链的顺应机构。通过基于矩阵的顺应性建模(MCM)方法、有限元模拟(FES)方法、拟议的纳米压痕方法和传统方法对它们的刚度进行了评估。在这四种方法的比较中,纳米压痕法可以准确评估顺应机构的刚度,不确定性小于 3%。与理论分析不同,所提出的纳米压痕法是一种实验评估工具,可以直接测量顺应机构制造后的刚度。仪器测量方法还大大减少了人为误差的影响。这对于指导顺应式机构的设计和预测其在使用中的传动特性具有重要的现实意义和科学价值。
期刊介绍:
Papers are sought that address innovative solutions to the development and use of electrical and electronic instruments and equipment to measure, monitor and/or record physical phenomena for the purpose of advancing measurement science, methods, functionality and applications. The scope of these papers may encompass: (1) theory, methodology, and practice of measurement; (2) design, development and evaluation of instrumentation and measurement systems and components used in generating, acquiring, conditioning and processing signals; (3) analysis, representation, display, and preservation of the information obtained from a set of measurements; and (4) scientific and technical support to establishment and maintenance of technical standards in the field of Instrumentation and Measurement.