{"title":"Queer Tax: Examining 2SLGBTQ+ Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour's experiences of accessing assisted reproductive technologies","authors":"Michelle W. Tam, Amaya Perez-Brumer, Lori E. Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has risen steadily over the past two decades. In Canada, up to 25 % of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) users identify as Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and/or queer (2SLGBTQ+). Despite evidence of inequitable ART access for 2SLGBTQ+ communities, scant research has explored the intersectional experiences of 2SLGBTQ+ Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour (BIPOC). Theoretically grounded in reproductive justice and critical political economy, this study examines ART access and clinical experiences for 2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC communities. Interviews were conducted with BIPOC and 2SLGBTQ+ people who had undergone or were seeking ART in Ontario, Canada<strong>.</strong> Data analysis, guided by constructivist grounded theory and situational analysis, was coded using MAXQDA. The findings reveal structural powers and systemic inequalities shaping the ART process and parenthood. Participants identified four key barriers faced by 2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC families: (1) normative practices (re)produced through ART; (2) mandatory counselling as gatekeeping and disciplining; (3) regulation of known donor sperm augmenting legal, financial, and timeliness barriers; and (4) limited availability of Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour donor sperm. These intersectional barriers highlight the urgent need for ART providers to offer competent and inclusive care. Additionally, the study underscores the necessity for clinical policy reforms to challenge heteronormative and racist practices, ensuring equitable access and improving availability of BIPOC donor sperm for diverse family structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"376 ","pages":"Article 118053"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has risen steadily over the past two decades. In Canada, up to 25 % of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) users identify as Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and/or queer (2SLGBTQ+). Despite evidence of inequitable ART access for 2SLGBTQ+ communities, scant research has explored the intersectional experiences of 2SLGBTQ+ Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour (BIPOC). Theoretically grounded in reproductive justice and critical political economy, this study examines ART access and clinical experiences for 2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC communities. Interviews were conducted with BIPOC and 2SLGBTQ+ people who had undergone or were seeking ART in Ontario, Canada. Data analysis, guided by constructivist grounded theory and situational analysis, was coded using MAXQDA. The findings reveal structural powers and systemic inequalities shaping the ART process and parenthood. Participants identified four key barriers faced by 2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC families: (1) normative practices (re)produced through ART; (2) mandatory counselling as gatekeeping and disciplining; (3) regulation of known donor sperm augmenting legal, financial, and timeliness barriers; and (4) limited availability of Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour donor sperm. These intersectional barriers highlight the urgent need for ART providers to offer competent and inclusive care. Additionally, the study underscores the necessity for clinical policy reforms to challenge heteronormative and racist practices, ensuring equitable access and improving availability of BIPOC donor sperm for diverse family structures.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.