Queer Tax: Examining 2SLGBTQ+ Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour's experiences of accessing assisted reproductive technologies

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Michelle W. Tam, Amaya Perez-Brumer, Lori E. Ross
{"title":"Queer Tax: Examining 2SLGBTQ+ Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour's experiences of accessing assisted reproductive technologies","authors":"Michelle W. Tam,&nbsp;Amaya Perez-Brumer,&nbsp;Lori E. Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has risen steadily over the past two decades. In Canada, up to 25 % of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) users identify as Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and/or queer (2SLGBTQ+). Despite evidence of inequitable ART access for 2SLGBTQ+ communities, scant research has explored the intersectional experiences of 2SLGBTQ+ Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour (BIPOC). Theoretically grounded in reproductive justice and critical political economy, this study examines ART access and clinical experiences for 2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC communities. Interviews were conducted with BIPOC and 2SLGBTQ+ people who had undergone or were seeking ART in Ontario, Canada<strong>.</strong> Data analysis, guided by constructivist grounded theory and situational analysis, was coded using MAXQDA. The findings reveal structural powers and systemic inequalities shaping the ART process and parenthood. Participants identified four key barriers faced by 2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC families: (1) normative practices (re)produced through ART; (2) mandatory counselling as gatekeeping and disciplining; (3) regulation of known donor sperm augmenting legal, financial, and timeliness barriers; and (4) limited availability of Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour donor sperm. These intersectional barriers highlight the urgent need for ART providers to offer competent and inclusive care. Additionally, the study underscores the necessity for clinical policy reforms to challenge heteronormative and racist practices, ensuring equitable access and improving availability of BIPOC donor sperm for diverse family structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"376 ","pages":"Article 118053"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has risen steadily over the past two decades. In Canada, up to 25 % of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) users identify as Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and/or queer (2SLGBTQ+). Despite evidence of inequitable ART access for 2SLGBTQ+ communities, scant research has explored the intersectional experiences of 2SLGBTQ+ Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour (BIPOC). Theoretically grounded in reproductive justice and critical political economy, this study examines ART access and clinical experiences for 2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC communities. Interviews were conducted with BIPOC and 2SLGBTQ+ people who had undergone or were seeking ART in Ontario, Canada. Data analysis, guided by constructivist grounded theory and situational analysis, was coded using MAXQDA. The findings reveal structural powers and systemic inequalities shaping the ART process and parenthood. Participants identified four key barriers faced by 2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC families: (1) normative practices (re)produced through ART; (2) mandatory counselling as gatekeeping and disciplining; (3) regulation of known donor sperm augmenting legal, financial, and timeliness barriers; and (4) limited availability of Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour donor sperm. These intersectional barriers highlight the urgent need for ART providers to offer competent and inclusive care. Additionally, the study underscores the necessity for clinical policy reforms to challenge heteronormative and racist practices, ensuring equitable access and improving availability of BIPOC donor sperm for diverse family structures.
酷儿税:调查2gbtq +黑人、原住民和有色人种获得辅助生殖技术的经历
在过去二十年中,辅助生殖技术的使用稳步上升。在加拿大,多达25%的辅助生殖技术(ART)使用者是双性恋、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和/或酷儿(2SLGBTQ+)。尽管有证据表明2SLGBTQ+社区获得抗逆转录病毒治疗的机会不公平,但很少有研究探讨2SLGBTQ+黑人、土著人和有色人种(BIPOC)的交叉经历。本研究以生殖正义和批判性政治经济学为理论基础,探讨了2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC社区的ART获取和临床经验。采访对象是BIPOC和2SLGBTQ+,他们在加拿大安大略省接受过或正在寻求抗逆转录病毒治疗。数据分析以建构主义扎根理论和情境分析为指导,采用MAXQDA编码。研究结果揭示了影响抗逆转录病毒治疗过程和亲子关系的结构性权力和系统性不平等。与会者确定了2SLGBTQ+ BIPOC家庭面临的四个主要障碍:(1)通过ART(抗逆转录病毒治疗)产生的规范性做法;(2)强制辅导作为把关和惩戒;(3)对已知供体精子进行监管,增加法律、财务和及时性障碍;(4)黑人、土著和有色人种捐献精子的数量有限。这些交叉障碍突出表明,抗逆转录病毒治疗提供者迫切需要提供称职和包容性的护理。此外,该研究强调了临床政策改革的必要性,以挑战异性恋和种族主义做法,确保公平获取和改善不同家庭结构的BIPOC供体精子的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信