Abe Hendriks , Kamilla Karhunmaa , Pierre Delvenne
{"title":"Shaping the future: A conceptual review of sociotechnical imaginaries","authors":"Abe Hendriks , Kamilla Karhunmaa , Pierre Delvenne","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The literature around sociotechnical imaginaries has proliferated since the seminal publications of Jasanoff and Kim (2009, 2015). In this conceptual review, we examine the evolution of the concept and engagement with it across disciplines. To investigate this, we develop and analyse a corpus of 306 papers that deal with, build on or develop the concept. We provide a description of the citation trends, the journals in which papers are published, and the empirical topics that are covered in the literature. Building on Jasanoff’s foundational insights about political differences, time, space, and collective identity, our evaluation examines how scholars have both elaborated and extended these dimensions. Our analysis focuses on four key areas of conceptual development: (1) how the future has been engaged with, (2) how the concept is used to trace changes over time, (3) the forms of comparison employed in research, and (4) the ways in which the spatio-material emphasis is manifested. Our analysis highlights how the concept has evolved through diverse encounters with other fields, and underscores how the concept can be useful for further research. We suggest focusing on the relations between imaginaries and adjacent concepts, the endurance of imaginaries, and the mediums through which imaginaries are channelled for further conceptual development with and through the concept.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 103607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The literature around sociotechnical imaginaries has proliferated since the seminal publications of Jasanoff and Kim (2009, 2015). In this conceptual review, we examine the evolution of the concept and engagement with it across disciplines. To investigate this, we develop and analyse a corpus of 306 papers that deal with, build on or develop the concept. We provide a description of the citation trends, the journals in which papers are published, and the empirical topics that are covered in the literature. Building on Jasanoff’s foundational insights about political differences, time, space, and collective identity, our evaluation examines how scholars have both elaborated and extended these dimensions. Our analysis focuses on four key areas of conceptual development: (1) how the future has been engaged with, (2) how the concept is used to trace changes over time, (3) the forms of comparison employed in research, and (4) the ways in which the spatio-material emphasis is manifested. Our analysis highlights how the concept has evolved through diverse encounters with other fields, and underscores how the concept can be useful for further research. We suggest focusing on the relations between imaginaries and adjacent concepts, the endurance of imaginaries, and the mediums through which imaginaries are channelled for further conceptual development with and through the concept.
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures