Identifying sustainable rice farming strategies in the Mekong Delta through systems analysis

Q2 Environmental Science
Håkan Berg , Nguyen Thanh Tam , Thai Huynh Phuong Lan , Tran Xuan Long , Chau Thi Da
{"title":"Identifying sustainable rice farming strategies in the Mekong Delta through systems analysis","authors":"Håkan Berg ,&nbsp;Nguyen Thanh Tam ,&nbsp;Thai Huynh Phuong Lan ,&nbsp;Tran Xuan Long ,&nbsp;Chau Thi Da","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study assesses the sustainability of intensive rice monocropping (IRM) and integrated rice-fish (IRF) farming in the Vietnam Mekong Delta, through systems analysis. Stakeholder (SH) consultations and a literature review were conducted to construct a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD), visualising the connections and effects of the two farming strategies across environmental, economic and social domains. 42 SHs, including farmers and scientists, assessed the impact of IRM and IRF on 42 interlinked CLD variables using a 5-point scale (-2 to 2). The SHs' scores were used to assess the farming strategies impact on 18 ecosystem services (ES) and the fulfilment of nine sustainable development goals (SDGs). The results show that IRM would have a negative impact on 14 ES, while IRF would have a positive impact on 17 ES. IRM was perceived to primarily have positive impacts on the rice yield and flood protection through an increased use of high dikes and agrochemicals, which however also was the main causes of the negative impacts on several other ES. IRF was perceived to have a positive effect on all SDGs, while IRM would only contribute to two and move away from seven SDGs. It is concluded that IRF provide a more sustainable alternative to IRM because it strengthens physical, ecological and social connections for an enhanced use of interlinked ES. This contributes to an increased productivity, farmers profit and wellbeing. IRF was also perceived to increase farming systems resilience, which is important for adapting to ongoing climate change and upstream dams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010025000848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the sustainability of intensive rice monocropping (IRM) and integrated rice-fish (IRF) farming in the Vietnam Mekong Delta, through systems analysis. Stakeholder (SH) consultations and a literature review were conducted to construct a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD), visualising the connections and effects of the two farming strategies across environmental, economic and social domains. 42 SHs, including farmers and scientists, assessed the impact of IRM and IRF on 42 interlinked CLD variables using a 5-point scale (-2 to 2). The SHs' scores were used to assess the farming strategies impact on 18 ecosystem services (ES) and the fulfilment of nine sustainable development goals (SDGs). The results show that IRM would have a negative impact on 14 ES, while IRF would have a positive impact on 17 ES. IRM was perceived to primarily have positive impacts on the rice yield and flood protection through an increased use of high dikes and agrochemicals, which however also was the main causes of the negative impacts on several other ES. IRF was perceived to have a positive effect on all SDGs, while IRM would only contribute to two and move away from seven SDGs. It is concluded that IRF provide a more sustainable alternative to IRM because it strengthens physical, ecological and social connections for an enhanced use of interlinked ES. This contributes to an increased productivity, farmers profit and wellbeing. IRF was also perceived to increase farming systems resilience, which is important for adapting to ongoing climate change and upstream dams.

Abstract Image

通过系统分析确定湄公河三角洲可持续水稻种植战略
本研究通过系统分析,评估了越南湄公河三角洲集约化水稻单作(IRM)和稻鱼综合耕作(IRF)的可持续性。进行了利益相关者(SH)咨询和文献综述,以构建因果循环图(CLD),可视化两种养殖策略在环境,经济和社会领域的联系和影响。包括农民和科学家在内的42位SHs使用5分制(-2至2)评估了IRM和IRF对42个相互关联的CLD变量的影响。SHs的得分用于评估耕作策略对18个生态系统服务(ES)和9个可持续发展目标(sdg)的实现的影响。结果表明,IRM对14个指标具有负向影响,IRF对17个指标具有正向影响。据认为,IRM主要通过增加使用高堤和农用化学品对水稻产量和防洪产生积极影响,但这也是对其他几个ES产生负面影响的主要原因。IRF被认为对所有可持续发展目标都有积极影响,而IRM只会对两个可持续发展目标做出贡献,并远离七个可持续发展目标。结论是,内部资源流动为内部资源流动提供了一个更可持续的替代方案,因为它加强了物理、生态和社会联系,以增强相互关联的生态系统的利用。这有助于提高生产力、农民利润和福祉。IRF还被认为可以提高农业系统的复原力,这对于适应持续的气候变化和上游水坝非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信