Hannah S. Tiffin , Justin D. Brown , Kathleen Kelly , Kyle R. Van Why , Mark Ternent , Andrew C. Camire , Edward J.A. Schuler , Richard T. Marconi , Erika T. Machtinger
{"title":"Infestation by Sarcoptes scabiei causes distinct differences in sarcoptic mange disease syndromes among sympatric carnivoran species","authors":"Hannah S. Tiffin , Justin D. Brown , Kathleen Kelly , Kyle R. Van Why , Mark Ternent , Andrew C. Camire , Edward J.A. Schuler , Richard T. Marconi , Erika T. Machtinger","doi":"10.1016/j.ijppaw.2025.101070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sarcoptic mange, caused by <em>Sarcoptes scabiei</em>, is a pan-emerging zoonotic disease, affecting new species and expanding into novel geographic locations in recent decades yet the distinct differences in disease syndromes between species remain poorly characterized and understood. This study investigated mange severity, mite burden, and immune response as characterized by dermapathology in sympatric carnivoran species in Pennsylvania, USA, assessing black bears (<em>Ursus americanus</em>), coyotes (<em>Canis latrans</em>), grey foxes (<em>Urocyon cinereoargenteus</em>), and red foxes (<em>Vulpes vulpes</em>). Scabietic and healthy individuals were evaluated using standardized metrics to assess health parameters between infested and healthy individuals and differences in mange disease syndromes between species. Mange severity varied significantly by species. Red foxes and black bears displayed more severe outward signs of mange infestation and higher mite burdens compared to coyotes, which exhibited milder physical and histologic signs of disease. Histologic analyses revealed significant differences in dermatologic lesions; black bears and red foxes more frequently had severe hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and secondary bacterial and yeast colonization, while coyotes had fewer and milder lesions. In terms of mite detection, tissue digestions were the most sensitive method, followed by cytology and histology. Serological screening detected the highest <em>S. scabiei</em> exposure rates in coyotes (53 %), followed by black bears (37 %), red foxes (17 %), and grey foxes (12 %). Notably, many seropositive coyotes showed no physical signs of mange, suggesting potential resistance or recovery. In contrast, red foxes exhibited severe disease and low seroprevalence, consistent with high mortality and limited recovery. These findings highlight species-specific differences in sarcoptic mange manifestation and host responses. Coyotes may act as reservoirs, contributing to disease persistence in the ecosystem, while red foxes and black bears suffer higher morbidity. This study emphasizes the need for integrated diagnostic and surveillance approaches to improve understanding of <em>S. scabiei</em> epidemiology and inform wildlife management strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54278,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224425000355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sarcoptic mange, caused by Sarcoptes scabiei, is a pan-emerging zoonotic disease, affecting new species and expanding into novel geographic locations in recent decades yet the distinct differences in disease syndromes between species remain poorly characterized and understood. This study investigated mange severity, mite burden, and immune response as characterized by dermapathology in sympatric carnivoran species in Pennsylvania, USA, assessing black bears (Ursus americanus), coyotes (Canis latrans), grey foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Scabietic and healthy individuals were evaluated using standardized metrics to assess health parameters between infested and healthy individuals and differences in mange disease syndromes between species. Mange severity varied significantly by species. Red foxes and black bears displayed more severe outward signs of mange infestation and higher mite burdens compared to coyotes, which exhibited milder physical and histologic signs of disease. Histologic analyses revealed significant differences in dermatologic lesions; black bears and red foxes more frequently had severe hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and secondary bacterial and yeast colonization, while coyotes had fewer and milder lesions. In terms of mite detection, tissue digestions were the most sensitive method, followed by cytology and histology. Serological screening detected the highest S. scabiei exposure rates in coyotes (53 %), followed by black bears (37 %), red foxes (17 %), and grey foxes (12 %). Notably, many seropositive coyotes showed no physical signs of mange, suggesting potential resistance or recovery. In contrast, red foxes exhibited severe disease and low seroprevalence, consistent with high mortality and limited recovery. These findings highlight species-specific differences in sarcoptic mange manifestation and host responses. Coyotes may act as reservoirs, contributing to disease persistence in the ecosystem, while red foxes and black bears suffer higher morbidity. This study emphasizes the need for integrated diagnostic and surveillance approaches to improve understanding of S. scabiei epidemiology and inform wildlife management strategies.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife (IJP-PAW) publishes the results of original research on parasites of all wildlife, invertebrate and vertebrate. This includes free-ranging, wild populations, as well as captive wildlife, semi-domesticated species (e.g. reindeer) and farmed populations of recently domesticated or wild-captured species (e.g. cultured fishes). Articles on all aspects of wildlife parasitology are welcomed including taxonomy, biodiversity and distribution, ecology and epidemiology, population biology and host-parasite relationships. The impact of parasites on the health and conservation of wildlife is seen as an important area covered by the journal especially the potential role of environmental factors, for example climate. Also important to the journal is ''one health'' and the nature of interactions between wildlife, people and domestic animals, including disease emergence and zoonoses.