{"title":"Staring into the abyss: Does accounting face a looming enrollment crisis?","authors":"Erik S. Boyle , Marcus Burger , Rana Mazumder","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leaders in higher education have predicted that declining birth rates since 2008 will lead to an enrollment cliff in higher education in which enrollment rates, which have steadily increased for decades, will reverse directions. Because many university budget models are predicated on increases to tuition, changes to this model can be catastrophic for universities that fail to plan ahead. We review recent trends in accounting degrees awarded, both individually and in comparison to other business school and university degree awards, to better understand how accounting is positioned relative to other degrees in higher education in the lead-up to this enrollment cliff. We review public data from the National Center for Education Statistics and find that accounting degrees awarded in the United States have steadily decreased since 2015. This decrease has occurred across institution types and demographic characteristics, indicating that there are fundamental issues with accounting that need to be addressed. Although the profession has taken some initial steps to encourage more students into the field of accounting, such as making changes to licensure procedures and requirements and encouraging accounting programs to seek out STEM designation, more measures may be needed for the supply of accountants to keep pace with future expected demand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 100967"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Leaders in higher education have predicted that declining birth rates since 2008 will lead to an enrollment cliff in higher education in which enrollment rates, which have steadily increased for decades, will reverse directions. Because many university budget models are predicated on increases to tuition, changes to this model can be catastrophic for universities that fail to plan ahead. We review recent trends in accounting degrees awarded, both individually and in comparison to other business school and university degree awards, to better understand how accounting is positioned relative to other degrees in higher education in the lead-up to this enrollment cliff. We review public data from the National Center for Education Statistics and find that accounting degrees awarded in the United States have steadily decreased since 2015. This decrease has occurred across institution types and demographic characteristics, indicating that there are fundamental issues with accounting that need to be addressed. Although the profession has taken some initial steps to encourage more students into the field of accounting, such as making changes to licensure procedures and requirements and encouraging accounting programs to seek out STEM designation, more measures may be needed for the supply of accountants to keep pace with future expected demand.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.