Everton Castelão Tetila , Gelson Wirti Junior , Gabriel Toshio Hirokawa Higa , Anderson Bessa da Costa , Willian Paraguassu Amorim , Hemerson Pistori , Jayme Garcia Arnal Barbedo
{"title":"Deep learning models for detection and recognition of weed species in corn crop","authors":"Everton Castelão Tetila , Gelson Wirti Junior , Gabriel Toshio Hirokawa Higa , Anderson Bessa da Costa , Willian Paraguassu Amorim , Hemerson Pistori , Jayme Garcia Arnal Barbedo","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Weed detection and control are important challenges in modern agriculture. Weed infestation can significantly reduce crop yields. The identification of weeds by species, along with their location, is important to reduce production costs and the environmental impact resulting from the use of chemical control across the plantation. In this study, we assessed four deep learning models for detection and recognition of weed species in corn crop. UAV flights were carried out over six corn farming areas at an altitude of 10 meters. Using LabelImg, we labeled almost 10,000 samples of six weed species with high incidence in corn crops. The resulting WEED6C-Dataset was made available for academic purposes. Model assessment was carried out using a 5-fold cross-validation, three metrics for classification evaluation, and six metrics for detection evaluation. Experimental results showed evidence for statistically significant differences between the assessed models. In our experiments, the Faster R-CNN architecture obtained the best results for recall, f-score, RMSE, MAE, R<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>, mAP50, mAP75 and mAP50-95. On the other hand, the SABL, FoveaBox and YOLOv3 architectures achieved higher precision rates for weed recognition in corn.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 107237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001292","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Weed detection and control are important challenges in modern agriculture. Weed infestation can significantly reduce crop yields. The identification of weeds by species, along with their location, is important to reduce production costs and the environmental impact resulting from the use of chemical control across the plantation. In this study, we assessed four deep learning models for detection and recognition of weed species in corn crop. UAV flights were carried out over six corn farming areas at an altitude of 10 meters. Using LabelImg, we labeled almost 10,000 samples of six weed species with high incidence in corn crops. The resulting WEED6C-Dataset was made available for academic purposes. Model assessment was carried out using a 5-fold cross-validation, three metrics for classification evaluation, and six metrics for detection evaluation. Experimental results showed evidence for statistically significant differences between the assessed models. In our experiments, the Faster R-CNN architecture obtained the best results for recall, f-score, RMSE, MAE, R, mAP50, mAP75 and mAP50-95. On the other hand, the SABL, FoveaBox and YOLOv3 architectures achieved higher precision rates for weed recognition in corn.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.