Rehabilitation outcomes and prognostic factors of nerve grafting combined with exercise therapy for high-level radial nerve injury: Results of a retrospective study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yifang Cen , Hongbo Zhao , Liaozhang Wu
{"title":"Rehabilitation outcomes and prognostic factors of nerve grafting combined with exercise therapy for high-level radial nerve injury: Results of a retrospective study","authors":"Yifang Cen ,&nbsp;Hongbo Zhao ,&nbsp;Liaozhang Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Radial nerve injury is one of the most common peripheral nerve injuries and can be effectively treated with nerve grafting. However, the efficacy of nerve grafting combined with exercise therapy for the treatment of radial nerve injury remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, we conducted a follow-up of at least one year in 40 patients with radial nerve injuries who received nerve grafting combined with exercise therapy, to evaluate their rehabilitation outcomes and identify the prognostic factors influencing the combined treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>62.5 % (<em>n</em> = 25) patients achieved M3+ extension strength. Shorter defect length and delayed repair time and more cables of nerve graft were significantly associated with the recovery of finger extension. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that defect length and delay in repair were the independent predictors of extensor digitorum communis reinnervation. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve suggested that both delay in repair (AUC = 0.808) and cables of nerve graft (AUC = 0.837) had a high accuracy in predicting the prognosis of nerve graft combined with exercise therapy, while delay in repair+cables of nerve graft (AUC = 0.960) had the highest accuracy. The optimal time for transplantation is 6.89 months (sensitivity = 86.7 %, specificity = 58.7 %) post-injury, and the optimal number of nerve grafts is 2.5 (sensitivity = 80 %, specificity = 53.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We demonstrated that the effectiveness of nerve grafting combined with exercise therapy in treating radial nerve injury, and delay in repair and cables of nerve graft may act as the prognostic predictors of nerve graft combined with exercise therapy. These findings may provide a novel therapeutic method for radial nerve injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 6","pages":"Article 112349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325002098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Radial nerve injury is one of the most common peripheral nerve injuries and can be effectively treated with nerve grafting. However, the efficacy of nerve grafting combined with exercise therapy for the treatment of radial nerve injury remains unclear.

Methods

In this study, we conducted a follow-up of at least one year in 40 patients with radial nerve injuries who received nerve grafting combined with exercise therapy, to evaluate their rehabilitation outcomes and identify the prognostic factors influencing the combined treatment.

Results

62.5 % (n = 25) patients achieved M3+ extension strength. Shorter defect length and delayed repair time and more cables of nerve graft were significantly associated with the recovery of finger extension. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that defect length and delay in repair were the independent predictors of extensor digitorum communis reinnervation. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve suggested that both delay in repair (AUC = 0.808) and cables of nerve graft (AUC = 0.837) had a high accuracy in predicting the prognosis of nerve graft combined with exercise therapy, while delay in repair+cables of nerve graft (AUC = 0.960) had the highest accuracy. The optimal time for transplantation is 6.89 months (sensitivity = 86.7 %, specificity = 58.7 %) post-injury, and the optimal number of nerve grafts is 2.5 (sensitivity = 80 %, specificity = 53.3 %).

Conclusion

We demonstrated that the effectiveness of nerve grafting combined with exercise therapy in treating radial nerve injury, and delay in repair and cables of nerve graft may act as the prognostic predictors of nerve graft combined with exercise therapy. These findings may provide a novel therapeutic method for radial nerve injury.
神经移植联合运动疗法治疗高位桡神经损伤的康复效果及预后因素:回顾性研究结果
背景桡神经损伤是最常见的周围神经损伤之一,神经移植是治疗桡神经损伤的有效方法。然而,神经移植联合运动疗法治疗桡神经损伤的疗效尚不清楚。方法对40例桡神经损伤患者行神经移植联合运动治疗,随访1年以上,评估其康复效果,探讨影响联合治疗预后的因素。结果62.5% (n = 25)患者伸展力量达到M3+。缺损长度较短、修复时间较晚、移植物索数较多与手指伸指恢复有显著相关性。此外,多因素分析显示缺损长度和修复延迟是指掌伸肌再神经支配的独立预测因素。此外,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线显示,延迟修复(AUC = 0.808)和神经移植索(AUC = 0.837)对运动治疗联合神经移植预后的预测准确率较高,而延迟修复+神经移植索(AUC = 0.960)的预测准确率最高。最佳移植时间为损伤后6.89个月(敏感性= 86.7%,特异性= 58.7%),最佳移植神经数量为2.5个月(敏感性= 80%,特异性= 53.3%)。结论神经移植联合运动疗法治疗桡神经损伤的有效性,神经移植修复的延迟和神经的延长线可能是神经移植联合运动疗法的预后预测因素。这些发现可能为桡神经损伤的治疗提供一种新的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信