Adhesion of bone cement to porous and nonporous 3D printed surfaces

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Caroline Alting , William R. Walsh , Robert Tait , Ken Gall
{"title":"Adhesion of bone cement to porous and nonporous 3D printed surfaces","authors":"Caroline Alting ,&nbsp;William R. Walsh ,&nbsp;Robert Tait ,&nbsp;Ken Gall","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.107019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bone cement is an adhesive commonly used to bond orthopedic implants to bone during a surgical procedure. Total joint replacements such as total knee, hip, shoulder, or ankle arthroplasties have metal or polymer components that are commonly cemented. However, implant failures can occur via debonding at the implant-cement interface, suggesting sub-optimal adhesion of the cement to the implant. In parallel, the orthopedic implant industry is seeing a significant rise in additive manufacturing (AM), which enables the seamless integration of surface porosity enhanced osseointegration in cementless procedures. However, there is a lack of foundational data or understanding of how bone cement adheres to 3D printed surfaces as a function of varying topography. This study evaluates adhesion of cement to clinically relevant printed implant surfaces, porous topographies, and materials. Adhesion strength of cemented samples was tested in shear. Surface porous layers were compared to traditional implant surface finishes (blasted, machined, polished). The impact of 3D printed surface porosity size and depth was also investigated. Testing revealed that the adhesive strength of porous surfaces (26.3 ± 3.1 MPa) was more than double the adhesive strength of all non-porous surfaces (the highest being the as-printed surface with a strength of 11.3 ± 2.5 MPa). The study also demonstrated porosity and layer-depth dependent performance trade-offs, with the best performing group having a 2x2x2 mm<sup>3</sup> unit cell size and 0.50 mm layer depth and a shear strength of 26.31 ± 3.10 MPa. These results provide a foundation for improving designs of emerging 3D printed orthopedic implants that can be both cemented and cementless.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107019"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616125001353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bone cement is an adhesive commonly used to bond orthopedic implants to bone during a surgical procedure. Total joint replacements such as total knee, hip, shoulder, or ankle arthroplasties have metal or polymer components that are commonly cemented. However, implant failures can occur via debonding at the implant-cement interface, suggesting sub-optimal adhesion of the cement to the implant. In parallel, the orthopedic implant industry is seeing a significant rise in additive manufacturing (AM), which enables the seamless integration of surface porosity enhanced osseointegration in cementless procedures. However, there is a lack of foundational data or understanding of how bone cement adheres to 3D printed surfaces as a function of varying topography. This study evaluates adhesion of cement to clinically relevant printed implant surfaces, porous topographies, and materials. Adhesion strength of cemented samples was tested in shear. Surface porous layers were compared to traditional implant surface finishes (blasted, machined, polished). The impact of 3D printed surface porosity size and depth was also investigated. Testing revealed that the adhesive strength of porous surfaces (26.3 ± 3.1 MPa) was more than double the adhesive strength of all non-porous surfaces (the highest being the as-printed surface with a strength of 11.3 ± 2.5 MPa). The study also demonstrated porosity and layer-depth dependent performance trade-offs, with the best performing group having a 2x2x2 mm3 unit cell size and 0.50 mm layer depth and a shear strength of 26.31 ± 3.10 MPa. These results provide a foundation for improving designs of emerging 3D printed orthopedic implants that can be both cemented and cementless.

Abstract Image

骨水泥对多孔和非多孔3D打印表面的粘附
骨水泥是一种常用的粘合剂,在外科手术过程中将骨科植入物粘接在骨头上。全关节置换术,如全膝关节、髋关节、肩关节或踝关节置换术,都有金属或聚合物部件,通常采用骨水泥。然而,种植体失败可能通过在种植体-骨水泥界面脱粘而发生,这表明骨水泥与种植体的粘附不理想。与此同时,骨科植入物行业正在见证增材制造(AM)的显著增长,这使得表面孔隙度的无缝集成在无水泥手术中增强了骨整合。然而,缺乏基础数据或了解骨水泥如何粘附在3D打印表面作为不同地形的函数。本研究评估了骨水泥与临床相关的打印种植体表面、多孔形貌和材料的粘附性。测试了胶结试样的剪切强度。将表面多孔层与传统的种植体表面处理(喷砂、机械加工、抛光)进行比较。研究了3D打印表面孔隙度大小和深度的影响。测试表明,多孔表面的粘接强度(26.3±3.1 MPa)是所有非多孔表面粘接强度的两倍多(最高的是打印表面,强度为11.3±2.5 MPa)。研究还证明了孔隙率和层深之间的性能权衡,其中表现最佳的组具有2x2x2 mm3的单元胞尺寸和0.50 mm的层深,抗剪强度为26.31±3.10 MPa。这些结果为改进新兴的3D打印骨科植入物的设计提供了基础,这些植入物既可以是胶结的,也可以是无胶结的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
505
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials. The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信