Funding for public transportation: results from a Midwest exit poll

IF 3.9 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Joseph S. Lightner , Greg Vonnahme , Steven Chesnut , Nancy Ziegler , Nathan Nguyen , Christiana Sylvaine , Rian Snead , Jordan A. Carlson , Jannette Berkley-Patton , Amanda Grimes
{"title":"Funding for public transportation: results from a Midwest exit poll","authors":"Joseph S. Lightner ,&nbsp;Greg Vonnahme ,&nbsp;Steven Chesnut ,&nbsp;Nancy Ziegler ,&nbsp;Nathan Nguyen ,&nbsp;Christiana Sylvaine ,&nbsp;Rian Snead ,&nbsp;Jordan A. Carlson ,&nbsp;Jannette Berkley-Patton ,&nbsp;Amanda Grimes","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public transportation can lead to increases in physical activity, access to jobs, healthcare, and healthy food, and may improve overall health. Funding for public transit is essential for a sustainable transportation system. However, most health studies have not focused on voting behavior as a mechanism for sustaining public transportation. This study employs a cross-sectional, in-person, exit poll of voters at 10 randomly selected polling locations during a local election in 2023 in Kansas City, Missouri. The voter ballot included a question to extend an existing 3/8 cent sales tax for public transportation. Participants (N = 649) overwhelmingly supported (90.6 %) sustaining taxes for public transportation. Individuals who used public transit (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.92, p &lt; 0.05) were more likely to support sustained taxes than individuals who did not use public transit. Republicans (OR = 0.03, p &lt; 0.001) and Independents (OR = 0.17, p &lt; 0.001) were less likely to support taxes than Democrats. Democratic affiliation (χ<sup>2</sup> = 82.9, p &lt; 0.001), older individuals (χ<sup>2</sup> = 19.66, p &lt; 0.01), and using public transit (Z = 3.90, p &lt; 0.001) were predictors of support for additional taxes, with 85.4 % of voters reporting that they are very or somewhat likely to support additional taxes. Public transit usage and political party affiliation seem to be the main factors that predict voting behavior for taxes that support public transit. These results suggest that transit agencies and policy makers should consider additional taxes to improve and expand public transit as a mechanism to improve population health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225001125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public transportation can lead to increases in physical activity, access to jobs, healthcare, and healthy food, and may improve overall health. Funding for public transit is essential for a sustainable transportation system. However, most health studies have not focused on voting behavior as a mechanism for sustaining public transportation. This study employs a cross-sectional, in-person, exit poll of voters at 10 randomly selected polling locations during a local election in 2023 in Kansas City, Missouri. The voter ballot included a question to extend an existing 3/8 cent sales tax for public transportation. Participants (N = 649) overwhelmingly supported (90.6 %) sustaining taxes for public transportation. Individuals who used public transit (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.92, p < 0.05) were more likely to support sustained taxes than individuals who did not use public transit. Republicans (OR = 0.03, p < 0.001) and Independents (OR = 0.17, p < 0.001) were less likely to support taxes than Democrats. Democratic affiliation (χ2 = 82.9, p < 0.001), older individuals (χ2 = 19.66, p < 0.01), and using public transit (Z = 3.90, p < 0.001) were predictors of support for additional taxes, with 85.4 % of voters reporting that they are very or somewhat likely to support additional taxes. Public transit usage and political party affiliation seem to be the main factors that predict voting behavior for taxes that support public transit. These results suggest that transit agencies and policy makers should consider additional taxes to improve and expand public transit as a mechanism to improve population health.
公共交通资金:来自中西部出口民调的结果
公共交通可以增加体力活动、获得工作、医疗保健和健康食品,并可能改善整体健康状况。公共交通的资金对可持续的交通系统至关重要。然而,大多数健康研究并没有将投票行为作为维持公共交通的机制。这项研究在2023年密苏里州堪萨斯城的一次地方选举中,对随机选择的10个投票站的选民进行了横断面、面对面的出口民意调查。选民投票包括一个问题,即是否延长现有的3/8美分公共交通销售税。参与者(N = 649)绝大多数(90.6%)支持维持公共交通税。使用公共交通的个人(优势比[OR] = 1.92, p <;0.05)比不使用公共交通的人更有可能支持持续的税收。共和党人(OR = 0.03, p <;0.001)和无党派人士(OR = 0.17, p <;0.001)比民主党更不可能支持税收。民主归属(χ2 = 82.9, p <;0.001),老年个体(χ2 = 19.66, p <;0.01),使用公共交通(Z = 3.90, p <;0.001)是支持额外税收的预测因素,85.4%的选民报告说他们非常或有可能支持额外税收。公共交通的使用和政党关系似乎是预测支持公共交通的税收的投票行为的主要因素。这些结果表明,公共交通机构和政策制定者应该考虑增加税收,以改善和扩大公共交通,作为改善人口健康的一种机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信