Joseph S. Lightner , Greg Vonnahme , Steven Chesnut , Nancy Ziegler , Nathan Nguyen , Christiana Sylvaine , Rian Snead , Jordan A. Carlson , Jannette Berkley-Patton , Amanda Grimes
{"title":"Funding for public transportation: results from a Midwest exit poll","authors":"Joseph S. Lightner , Greg Vonnahme , Steven Chesnut , Nancy Ziegler , Nathan Nguyen , Christiana Sylvaine , Rian Snead , Jordan A. Carlson , Jannette Berkley-Patton , Amanda Grimes","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public transportation can lead to increases in physical activity, access to jobs, healthcare, and healthy food, and may improve overall health. Funding for public transit is essential for a sustainable transportation system. However, most health studies have not focused on voting behavior as a mechanism for sustaining public transportation. This study employs a cross-sectional, in-person, exit poll of voters at 10 randomly selected polling locations during a local election in 2023 in Kansas City, Missouri. The voter ballot included a question to extend an existing 3/8 cent sales tax for public transportation. Participants (N = 649) overwhelmingly supported (90.6 %) sustaining taxes for public transportation. Individuals who used public transit (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.92, p < 0.05) were more likely to support sustained taxes than individuals who did not use public transit. Republicans (OR = 0.03, p < 0.001) and Independents (OR = 0.17, p < 0.001) were less likely to support taxes than Democrats. Democratic affiliation (χ<sup>2</sup> = 82.9, p < 0.001), older individuals (χ<sup>2</sup> = 19.66, p < 0.01), and using public transit (Z = 3.90, p < 0.001) were predictors of support for additional taxes, with 85.4 % of voters reporting that they are very or somewhat likely to support additional taxes. Public transit usage and political party affiliation seem to be the main factors that predict voting behavior for taxes that support public transit. These results suggest that transit agencies and policy makers should consider additional taxes to improve and expand public transit as a mechanism to improve population health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225001125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Public transportation can lead to increases in physical activity, access to jobs, healthcare, and healthy food, and may improve overall health. Funding for public transit is essential for a sustainable transportation system. However, most health studies have not focused on voting behavior as a mechanism for sustaining public transportation. This study employs a cross-sectional, in-person, exit poll of voters at 10 randomly selected polling locations during a local election in 2023 in Kansas City, Missouri. The voter ballot included a question to extend an existing 3/8 cent sales tax for public transportation. Participants (N = 649) overwhelmingly supported (90.6 %) sustaining taxes for public transportation. Individuals who used public transit (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.92, p < 0.05) were more likely to support sustained taxes than individuals who did not use public transit. Republicans (OR = 0.03, p < 0.001) and Independents (OR = 0.17, p < 0.001) were less likely to support taxes than Democrats. Democratic affiliation (χ2 = 82.9, p < 0.001), older individuals (χ2 = 19.66, p < 0.01), and using public transit (Z = 3.90, p < 0.001) were predictors of support for additional taxes, with 85.4 % of voters reporting that they are very or somewhat likely to support additional taxes. Public transit usage and political party affiliation seem to be the main factors that predict voting behavior for taxes that support public transit. These results suggest that transit agencies and policy makers should consider additional taxes to improve and expand public transit as a mechanism to improve population health.
公共交通可以增加体力活动、获得工作、医疗保健和健康食品,并可能改善整体健康状况。公共交通的资金对可持续的交通系统至关重要。然而,大多数健康研究并没有将投票行为作为维持公共交通的机制。这项研究在2023年密苏里州堪萨斯城的一次地方选举中,对随机选择的10个投票站的选民进行了横断面、面对面的出口民意调查。选民投票包括一个问题,即是否延长现有的3/8美分公共交通销售税。参与者(N = 649)绝大多数(90.6%)支持维持公共交通税。使用公共交通的个人(优势比[OR] = 1.92, p <;0.05)比不使用公共交通的人更有可能支持持续的税收。共和党人(OR = 0.03, p <;0.001)和无党派人士(OR = 0.17, p <;0.001)比民主党更不可能支持税收。民主归属(χ2 = 82.9, p <;0.001),老年个体(χ2 = 19.66, p <;0.01),使用公共交通(Z = 3.90, p <;0.001)是支持额外税收的预测因素,85.4%的选民报告说他们非常或有可能支持额外税收。公共交通的使用和政党关系似乎是预测支持公共交通的税收的投票行为的主要因素。这些结果表明,公共交通机构和政策制定者应该考虑增加税收,以改善和扩大公共交通,作为改善人口健康的一种机制。