Pacemaker migration into the peritoneal cavity in children: a case series

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Nicole H. Chicoine , Patrick J. Javid , David H. Rothstein , Samuel E. Rice-Townsend , Kimberly J. Riehle , Terrence U. Chun , Sarah L.M. Greenberg
{"title":"Pacemaker migration into the peritoneal cavity in children: a case series","authors":"Nicole H. Chicoine ,&nbsp;Patrick J. Javid ,&nbsp;David H. Rothstein ,&nbsp;Samuel E. Rice-Townsend ,&nbsp;Kimberly J. Riehle ,&nbsp;Terrence U. Chun ,&nbsp;Sarah L.M. Greenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.epsc.2025.103016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cardiac pacemakers can have a variety of complications, one of which is migration into the peritoneal cavity. This complication, which can have variable clinical manifestations, has rarely been reported in pediatric patients.</div></div><div><h3>Case presentations</h3><div>Patient 1 was an 8-year-old female who had a pacemaker placed at the age of 1 year due to periodic asystole. She presented with rectal extrusion of a pacemaker lead. Computerized tomography (CT) scan confirmed the migration of the pacemaker generator and the lead to the area of the rectum. The devices were successfully removed transrectally. Patient 2 was a 19-year-old male with complete AV block who had a dual chamber pacemaker placed at the age of 7 years. Migration was detected at the age of 17 years on a routine abdomen/chest x-ray, and was confirmed on a CT. Laparoscopic retrieval was done at the age of 19 years. Patient 3 was a 1-year-old male with congenital heart disease requiring pacemaker placement at the age of 3 months. During a transvenous lead replacement at the age of 15 months, intraperitoneal migration was incidentally noticed at the time of the abdominal wall incision. The device was removed and replaced through the same incision. Patient 4 was a former 27 weeker male who had a pacemaker placed at the age of 5 months. At the age of 7 months, an abdominal x-ray done for unrelated reasons suggested possible pacemaker migration. Given that the patient was asymptomatic, and that the pacemaker was functioning properly, the pacemaker was left in place at that time and removed much later when the patient was 3 years old.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Migration of abdominal wall pacemakers in pediatric patients may present with or without symptoms. In select asymptomatic cases with preserved device function, delayed or elective surgical intervention may be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213576625000612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cardiac pacemakers can have a variety of complications, one of which is migration into the peritoneal cavity. This complication, which can have variable clinical manifestations, has rarely been reported in pediatric patients.

Case presentations

Patient 1 was an 8-year-old female who had a pacemaker placed at the age of 1 year due to periodic asystole. She presented with rectal extrusion of a pacemaker lead. Computerized tomography (CT) scan confirmed the migration of the pacemaker generator and the lead to the area of the rectum. The devices were successfully removed transrectally. Patient 2 was a 19-year-old male with complete AV block who had a dual chamber pacemaker placed at the age of 7 years. Migration was detected at the age of 17 years on a routine abdomen/chest x-ray, and was confirmed on a CT. Laparoscopic retrieval was done at the age of 19 years. Patient 3 was a 1-year-old male with congenital heart disease requiring pacemaker placement at the age of 3 months. During a transvenous lead replacement at the age of 15 months, intraperitoneal migration was incidentally noticed at the time of the abdominal wall incision. The device was removed and replaced through the same incision. Patient 4 was a former 27 weeker male who had a pacemaker placed at the age of 5 months. At the age of 7 months, an abdominal x-ray done for unrelated reasons suggested possible pacemaker migration. Given that the patient was asymptomatic, and that the pacemaker was functioning properly, the pacemaker was left in place at that time and removed much later when the patient was 3 years old.

Conclusion

Migration of abdominal wall pacemakers in pediatric patients may present with or without symptoms. In select asymptomatic cases with preserved device function, delayed or elective surgical intervention may be considered.
儿童心脏起搏器迁移至腹膜腔:一个病例系列
心脏起搏器可能有多种并发症,其中之一是移入腹腔。这种并发症可有不同的临床表现,很少在儿科患者中报道。病例介绍:患者1是一名8岁的女性,由于周期性心脏骤停,在1岁时放置了起搏器。她表现为直肠起搏器导联挤压。计算机断层扫描(CT)证实了起搏器发生器和铅的迁移直肠区域。器械经直肠成功取出。患者2为19岁男性,完全性房室传导阻滞,7岁时植入双室起搏器。在17岁时通过常规腹部/胸部x线检查发现迁移,并在CT上得到证实。在19岁时进行腹腔镜手术。患者3是一名患有先天性心脏病的1岁男性,在3个月大时需要放置起搏器。在15个月大的经静脉铅置换期间,在腹壁切口时偶然注意到腹腔内迁移。该装置被移除并通过相同的切口更换。患者4是一名27周大的男性,在5个月大时植入了起搏器。7个月大时,腹部x线检查显示可能有起搏器移位。考虑到患者无症状,并且起搏器功能正常,起搏器当时留在原位,直到患者3岁时才取出。结论小儿腹壁起搏器移位可能有或无症状。在保留装置功能的无症状病例中,可以考虑延迟或选择性手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
15 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信