{"title":"Robustness analysis for innovative tall composite modular buildings with composite shear walls","authors":"Gaurav Swami, Huu-Tai Thai, Xuemei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research investigates the robustness of tall composite modular buildings using alternate load path method (ALP) subjected to sudden element removal under the effect of gravity loads. A finite element model of a 50-storey modular building was developed with concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) columns and composite shear walls (CSW) in Abaqus. Core CSW were designed instead of conventional reinforced concrete shear walls to benefit with their modularity, effective time frame and better load sharing. Conventional steel columns were replaced with CFST columns to provide improved buckling and post buckling resistance. Non-linear dynamic and static analyses were conducted to investigate the real-time response, load transfer behavior and the ultimate failure scenarios. The 50-storey composite modular building showed sufficient resistance against progressive collapse under column and module loss scenarios. It was observed that the inter-module connections play a critical role in a module loss scenario, whereas the adjacent beams play a crucial role in the event of column removal. Dynamic amplification factors (DAF) were interpreted using the non-linear static analysis and compared with the available guidelines by general service administration (GSA). DAF of 1.20 was calculated for the 50-storey modular building subjected to critical corner module removal which was significantly lower than the value of 2.0 as suggested by GSA guidelines. A detailed parametric study was conducted to evaluate the DAF for various locations in the floor layout and the elevation of building. DAF of 1.223 and 1.216 were observed for a 30-storey and 40-storey modular building, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 112712"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225009490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research investigates the robustness of tall composite modular buildings using alternate load path method (ALP) subjected to sudden element removal under the effect of gravity loads. A finite element model of a 50-storey modular building was developed with concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) columns and composite shear walls (CSW) in Abaqus. Core CSW were designed instead of conventional reinforced concrete shear walls to benefit with their modularity, effective time frame and better load sharing. Conventional steel columns were replaced with CFST columns to provide improved buckling and post buckling resistance. Non-linear dynamic and static analyses were conducted to investigate the real-time response, load transfer behavior and the ultimate failure scenarios. The 50-storey composite modular building showed sufficient resistance against progressive collapse under column and module loss scenarios. It was observed that the inter-module connections play a critical role in a module loss scenario, whereas the adjacent beams play a crucial role in the event of column removal. Dynamic amplification factors (DAF) were interpreted using the non-linear static analysis and compared with the available guidelines by general service administration (GSA). DAF of 1.20 was calculated for the 50-storey modular building subjected to critical corner module removal which was significantly lower than the value of 2.0 as suggested by GSA guidelines. A detailed parametric study was conducted to evaluate the DAF for various locations in the floor layout and the elevation of building. DAF of 1.223 and 1.216 were observed for a 30-storey and 40-storey modular building, respectively.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.