{"title":"Ecological implications of the direct effects of fire on neotropical vertebrates","authors":"Alessandra Rezende Pereira , Fillipe Tamiozzo Pereira Torres , Christian Niel Berlinck","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Changes in fire regimes have significantly impacted wildlife, affecting both mortality rates and indirect effects on fauna. Estimating the direct effects of fire on animals is complex and variable, revealing a critical knowledge gap regarding animal mortality and the consequent loss of ecosystem services. To address this gap, we conducted an analysis to identify the taxonomic groups most negatively affected by fire and to assess the ecosystem services provided by impacted mammals. We utilized a Citizen Science-based database containing photographs of animals directly affected by fire in Brazil. Our dataset includes 2638 individuals distributed across five of the six Brazilian biomes. Our results indicate that reptiles were the most affected group (59.02 %), followed by mammals (28.20 %). Among the most compromised ecosystem services are disease sentinelling, the cultural value of charismatic species, ecotourism, and seed dispersal. Additionally, we confirmed the hypothesis that small-bodied and low-mobility animals are the most vulnerable, accounting for 64.78 % of the records. Finally, we recommend strategies to mitigate the negative effects of fire on wildlife and to enhance the understanding of these impacts, such as biodiversity monitoring using genetic methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"979 ","pages":"Article 179437"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725010745","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Changes in fire regimes have significantly impacted wildlife, affecting both mortality rates and indirect effects on fauna. Estimating the direct effects of fire on animals is complex and variable, revealing a critical knowledge gap regarding animal mortality and the consequent loss of ecosystem services. To address this gap, we conducted an analysis to identify the taxonomic groups most negatively affected by fire and to assess the ecosystem services provided by impacted mammals. We utilized a Citizen Science-based database containing photographs of animals directly affected by fire in Brazil. Our dataset includes 2638 individuals distributed across five of the six Brazilian biomes. Our results indicate that reptiles were the most affected group (59.02 %), followed by mammals (28.20 %). Among the most compromised ecosystem services are disease sentinelling, the cultural value of charismatic species, ecotourism, and seed dispersal. Additionally, we confirmed the hypothesis that small-bodied and low-mobility animals are the most vulnerable, accounting for 64.78 % of the records. Finally, we recommend strategies to mitigate the negative effects of fire on wildlife and to enhance the understanding of these impacts, such as biodiversity monitoring using genetic methodologies.
期刊介绍:
The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere.
The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.