E-health intervention for co-occurring at-risk alcohol use and depressive symptoms: Reach, adherence, and two-year effects of a randomized controlled trial
D. Guertler , S. Baumann , A. Moehring , K. Krause , J. Freyer-Adam , S. Ulbricht , G. Bischof , A. Batra , H.J. Rumpf , S. Wurm , M. Lucht , U. John , C. Meyer
{"title":"E-health intervention for co-occurring at-risk alcohol use and depressive symptoms: Reach, adherence, and two-year effects of a randomized controlled trial","authors":"D. Guertler , S. Baumann , A. Moehring , K. Krause , J. Freyer-Adam , S. Ulbricht , G. Bischof , A. Batra , H.J. Rumpf , S. Wurm , M. Lucht , U. John , C. Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.04.095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This randomized controlled trial explored reach, adherence, and two-year effects of a proactive e-health intervention for co-occurring at-risk alcohol use and depressive symptoms (ITE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>German medical care patients were screened for at-risk alcohol use and subthreshold depression. Over 6 months, ITE participants received 6 individualized feedback letters and weekly text messages. Primary outcome was change in a composite measure including problematic alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test consumption questions) and depressive symptoms (two subscales of the Patient-Health-Questionnaire-8) from baseline to 6, 12, and 24 months. Analyses were adjusted for education, setting, major depression, and baseline differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among eligible patients invited, 51 % agreed to participate; 40 % completed the baseline interview and were randomized to ITE (<em>n</em> = 64) or assessment only (<em>n</em> = 68). Within ITE participants, 73 % received all intervention components. A latent change model revealed a small, insignificant impact of study group on the composite measure at 6 (d = −0.49, β = −0.41, <em>p</em> = 0.06) and 12 months (d = −0.26, β = −0.22, <em>p</em> = 0.35), diminishing at 24 months (d = −0.06, β = −0.04, <em>p</em> = 0.88). Secondary analyses showed a non-significant trend at 6 months, suggesting possible effect modification by baseline major depression (β = 0.80, <em>p</em> = 0.098), with larger effects in those without major depression.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Self-reported outcomes; psychotherapy status unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>ITE showed high adherence and overall small, although non-significant, intervention effects up to month 12. The potential effect moderation warrants further investigation in larger samples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"382 ","pages":"Pages 355-365"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725006512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
This randomized controlled trial explored reach, adherence, and two-year effects of a proactive e-health intervention for co-occurring at-risk alcohol use and depressive symptoms (ITE).
Methods
German medical care patients were screened for at-risk alcohol use and subthreshold depression. Over 6 months, ITE participants received 6 individualized feedback letters and weekly text messages. Primary outcome was change in a composite measure including problematic alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test consumption questions) and depressive symptoms (two subscales of the Patient-Health-Questionnaire-8) from baseline to 6, 12, and 24 months. Analyses were adjusted for education, setting, major depression, and baseline differences.
Results
Among eligible patients invited, 51 % agreed to participate; 40 % completed the baseline interview and were randomized to ITE (n = 64) or assessment only (n = 68). Within ITE participants, 73 % received all intervention components. A latent change model revealed a small, insignificant impact of study group on the composite measure at 6 (d = −0.49, β = −0.41, p = 0.06) and 12 months (d = −0.26, β = −0.22, p = 0.35), diminishing at 24 months (d = −0.06, β = −0.04, p = 0.88). Secondary analyses showed a non-significant trend at 6 months, suggesting possible effect modification by baseline major depression (β = 0.80, p = 0.098), with larger effects in those without major depression.
Limitations
Self-reported outcomes; psychotherapy status unknown.
Discussion
ITE showed high adherence and overall small, although non-significant, intervention effects up to month 12. The potential effect moderation warrants further investigation in larger samples.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.