Exploring customers' reuse intention to robots under different service failures: A mind perception perspective

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Dewen Liu , Jieqiong Zhang , Jiali Qi
{"title":"Exploring customers' reuse intention to robots under different service failures: A mind perception perspective","authors":"Dewen Liu ,&nbsp;Jieqiong Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiali Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence-based service robot failures (hereafter referred to as robot service failures) are inevitable in service practice, making the mitigation of their adverse effects a critical concern for service managers. The present paper investigates the unique classification of robot service failures with the help of mind perception theory and a consumer-centered perspective. Moreover, we further examine the impact of robot service failures on consumer behavioral responses (i.e., reuse intention), the mediating role of negative emotions, and the moderating effect of service robot anthropomorphism. Using a mixed-methods approach, Study 1, based on robot service failure reviews from Ctrip and word co-occurrence network analysis, reveals a two-dimensional classification of robot service failures: agential failures and experiential failures. Furthermore, leveraging the same dataset, Study 2 calculates negative emotions in the text and uses consumer evaluations as a proxy for reuse intention. The results indicate that agential failures (compared to experiential failures) exert a more significant negative impact on consumers, and this relationship is mediated by negative emotions. Study 3 employs a behavioral experiment to further validate the findings of Study 2 and additionally reveals that service robot anthropomorphism moderates the relationship between service failures, negative emotions, and reuse intention, leading to more adverse consequences for experiential failures. This paper makes a valuable contribution to the emerging literature on robot service failures by exploring the distinctiveness of robot services. To the best of our knowledge, this is the pioneering empirical study that explores the unique dimensions of robot service failures. Practically, the findings provide actionable insights. Understanding the classification of robot service failures, which differs from human service failures, allows for a deeper comprehension of AI-powered services and offers effective intervention strategies for consumer recovery following service failures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 105030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825003439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence-based service robot failures (hereafter referred to as robot service failures) are inevitable in service practice, making the mitigation of their adverse effects a critical concern for service managers. The present paper investigates the unique classification of robot service failures with the help of mind perception theory and a consumer-centered perspective. Moreover, we further examine the impact of robot service failures on consumer behavioral responses (i.e., reuse intention), the mediating role of negative emotions, and the moderating effect of service robot anthropomorphism. Using a mixed-methods approach, Study 1, based on robot service failure reviews from Ctrip and word co-occurrence network analysis, reveals a two-dimensional classification of robot service failures: agential failures and experiential failures. Furthermore, leveraging the same dataset, Study 2 calculates negative emotions in the text and uses consumer evaluations as a proxy for reuse intention. The results indicate that agential failures (compared to experiential failures) exert a more significant negative impact on consumers, and this relationship is mediated by negative emotions. Study 3 employs a behavioral experiment to further validate the findings of Study 2 and additionally reveals that service robot anthropomorphism moderates the relationship between service failures, negative emotions, and reuse intention, leading to more adverse consequences for experiential failures. This paper makes a valuable contribution to the emerging literature on robot service failures by exploring the distinctiveness of robot services. To the best of our knowledge, this is the pioneering empirical study that explores the unique dimensions of robot service failures. Practically, the findings provide actionable insights. Understanding the classification of robot service failures, which differs from human service failures, allows for a deeper comprehension of AI-powered services and offers effective intervention strategies for consumer recovery following service failures.
不同服务故障下顾客对机器人的重用意向:心理感知视角
基于人工智能的服务机器人故障(以下简称机器人服务故障)在服务实践中是不可避免的,因此减轻其不利影响是服务管理者关注的关键问题。本文运用心理感知理论和以消费者为中心的视角,对机器人服务故障的独特分类进行了研究。此外,我们进一步研究了机器人服务失败对消费者行为反应(即重复使用意愿)的影响、负面情绪的中介作用以及服务机器人拟人化的调节作用。研究1采用混合方法,基于携程的机器人服务故障评论和词共现网络分析,揭示了机器人服务故障的二维分类:代理故障和体验故障。此外,利用相同的数据集,研究2计算文本中的负面情绪,并使用消费者评价作为重用意图的代理。结果表明,代理失败对消费者的负向影响比体验失败更显著,而这种负向影响是由负性情绪介导的。研究3通过行为实验进一步验证了研究2的研究结果,并发现服务机器人拟人化调节了服务失败、负面情绪和重用意图之间的关系,导致体验失败产生更多的不良后果。本文通过探索机器人服务的特殊性,对机器人服务故障的新兴文献做出了有价值的贡献。据我们所知,这是一项开创性的实证研究,探索了机器人服务故障的独特维度。实际上,这些发现提供了可操作的见解。了解机器人服务故障的分类不同于人类服务故障,可以更深入地理解人工智能驱动的服务,并为服务故障后的消费者恢复提供有效的干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信