To Hop or Not to Hop: Unveiling Different Modes of Ion Transport in Solid Polymer Electrolytes through Molecular Dynamics Simulations

IF 4.4 2区 化学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Harish Gudla, Anne Hockmann, Daniel Brandell and Jonas Mindemark*, 
{"title":"To Hop or Not to Hop: Unveiling Different Modes of Ion Transport in Solid Polymer Electrolytes through Molecular Dynamics Simulations","authors":"Harish Gudla,&nbsp;Anne Hockmann,&nbsp;Daniel Brandell and Jonas Mindemark*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsapm.4c0372410.1021/acsapm.4c03724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Although the basic modes of ion transport in solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are already classified and well-described, their distribution in typical polymer electrolytes is not clear and neither are the effects on the distribution by different degrees of ion–ion and ion–polymer interactions. Here, the ion-transport mechanisms in poly(ethylene oxide) are studied along with poly(ε-caprolactone) at different molecular weights and LiTFSI salt concentrations using molecular dynamics simulations. Through tracking of the cation coordination changes, three transport mechanisms are categorized, i.e., ion hopping, continuous motion (successive exchange of the coordination sphere), and vehicular transport. The observed dominant transport mechanism is in all cases continuous motion, which changes from polymer-mediated to anion-mediated with increasing salt concentration, while polymer-mediated vehicular transport is not observed to be a major contributor to cation transport. In both systems, ion hopping is also essentially absent, as can be expected in systems with strong ion–polymer interactions. The results illustrate how the usual description of ion transport in polymer electrolytes as coupled to segmental motions is too simplistic to catch the full essence of the ion-transport phenomena, whereas the frequently used notion of “ion hopping” in the majority of cases is incorrect for SPEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Polymer Materials","volume":"7 8","pages":"4716–4724 4716–4724"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsapm.4c03724","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Polymer Materials","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsapm.4c03724","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the basic modes of ion transport in solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are already classified and well-described, their distribution in typical polymer electrolytes is not clear and neither are the effects on the distribution by different degrees of ion–ion and ion–polymer interactions. Here, the ion-transport mechanisms in poly(ethylene oxide) are studied along with poly(ε-caprolactone) at different molecular weights and LiTFSI salt concentrations using molecular dynamics simulations. Through tracking of the cation coordination changes, three transport mechanisms are categorized, i.e., ion hopping, continuous motion (successive exchange of the coordination sphere), and vehicular transport. The observed dominant transport mechanism is in all cases continuous motion, which changes from polymer-mediated to anion-mediated with increasing salt concentration, while polymer-mediated vehicular transport is not observed to be a major contributor to cation transport. In both systems, ion hopping is also essentially absent, as can be expected in systems with strong ion–polymer interactions. The results illustrate how the usual description of ion transport in polymer electrolytes as coupled to segmental motions is too simplistic to catch the full essence of the ion-transport phenomena, whereas the frequently used notion of “ion hopping” in the majority of cases is incorrect for SPEs.

跳还是不跳:通过分子动力学模拟揭示固体聚合物电解质中离子传输的不同模式
虽然固体聚合物电解质(spe)中离子输运的基本模式已经被分类和很好地描述,但它们在典型聚合物电解质中的分布并不清楚,不同程度的离子-离子和离子-聚合物相互作用对分布的影响也不清楚。本文采用分子动力学模拟的方法,研究了不同分子量和不同盐浓度下聚(ε-己内酯)在聚(环氧乙烷)和聚(ε-己内酯)中的离子传输机理。通过对阳离子配位变化的跟踪,将离子跳跃、连续运动(配位球的连续交换)和车辆运输三种输运机制进行了分类。观察到的主要运输机制在所有情况下都是连续运动,随着盐浓度的增加,从聚合物介导转变为阴离子介导,而聚合物介导的车辆运输并不是阳离子运输的主要因素。在这两种体系中,离子跳跃也基本上不存在,正如可以预期的那样,在具有强离子-聚合物相互作用的体系中。结果表明,通常将聚合物电解质中的离子传输描述为与节段运动相耦合,过于简单,无法捕捉到离子传输现象的全部本质,而在大多数情况下经常使用的“离子跳跃”概念对于spe是不正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
810
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Polymer Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of engineering, chemistry, physics, and biology relevant to applications of polymers. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates fundamental knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, polymer science and chemistry into important polymer applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses relationships among structure, processing, morphology, chemistry, properties, and function as well as work that provide insights into mechanisms critical to the performance of the polymer for applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信