Long-Term Postoperative Outcomes by Surgeon Gender and Patient-Surgeon Gender Concordance in the US

IF 15.7 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Ryo Ikesu, Hiroshi Gotanda, Tara A. Russell, Melinda Maggard-Gibbons, Marcia McGory Russell, Ryu Yoshida, Ruixin Li, Alexandra Klomhaus, Christian de Virgilio, Yusuke Tsugawa
{"title":"Long-Term Postoperative Outcomes by Surgeon Gender and Patient-Surgeon Gender Concordance in the US","authors":"Ryo Ikesu, Hiroshi Gotanda, Tara A. Russell, Melinda Maggard-Gibbons, Marcia McGory Russell, Ryu Yoshida, Ruixin Li, Alexandra Klomhaus, Christian de Virgilio, Yusuke Tsugawa","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceEvidence suggests that physician gender and patient-physician gender concordance have the potential to improve patient outcomes, especially for female patients. However, whether long-term outcomes differ by surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance has not been studied in the US.ObjectiveTo compare long-term postoperative outcomes by surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA population-based cross-sectional study was conducted based on 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2016 through 2019. Data analysis was performed between October 17, 2023, and January 28, 2025. The study took place at acute care hospitals in the US. Participants included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 to 99 years who underwent 1 of 14 elective or emergent surgeries.ExposuresSurgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance.Main Outcomes and MeasuresNinety-day and 1-year postoperative mortality, readmission, and complication rates were compared by surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance. The study team adjusted for patient and surgeon characteristics and hospital fixed effects, effectively comparing patients within the same hospital.ResultsAmong 2 288 279 patients who underwent surgery, 129 528 were operated on by female surgeons (5.7%) and 2 158 751 were by male surgeons (94.3%). Patients treated by female surgeons experienced a lower long-term mortality rate compared with those treated by male surgeons (adjusted 90-day mortality rates, 2.6% for female surgeons vs 3.0% for male surgeons; adjusted risk difference [aRD], −0.3 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, −0.5 pp to −0.2 pp; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), similarly for both female and male patients. For female patients, the patient-surgeon gender concordance was associated with lower long-term readmission (adjusted 90-day readmission rates, 7.3% vs 7.7%; aRD, −0.4 pp; 95% CI, −0.7 pp to −0.2 pp; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .001) and complication rates (adjusted 90-day complication rates, 12.2% vs 12.8%; aRD, −0.5 pp; 95% CI, −0.9 pp to −0.2 pp; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .005). For male patients, long-term readmission and complication rates did not differ between patients treated by female vs male surgeons. Similar patterns were found between 90-day and 1-year patient outcomes.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, both female and male patients treated by female surgeons experienced lower long-term postoperative mortality rates compared with those treated by male surgeons. Patient-surgeon gender concordance was associated with lower long-term readmission and complication rates for female patients, but not for male patients. These patterns were observed only for elective procedures and may not be generalizable to other populations, such as younger patients.","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2025.0866","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceEvidence suggests that physician gender and patient-physician gender concordance have the potential to improve patient outcomes, especially for female patients. However, whether long-term outcomes differ by surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance has not been studied in the US.ObjectiveTo compare long-term postoperative outcomes by surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA population-based cross-sectional study was conducted based on 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2016 through 2019. Data analysis was performed between October 17, 2023, and January 28, 2025. The study took place at acute care hospitals in the US. Participants included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 to 99 years who underwent 1 of 14 elective or emergent surgeries.ExposuresSurgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance.Main Outcomes and MeasuresNinety-day and 1-year postoperative mortality, readmission, and complication rates were compared by surgeon gender and patient-surgeon gender concordance. The study team adjusted for patient and surgeon characteristics and hospital fixed effects, effectively comparing patients within the same hospital.ResultsAmong 2 288 279 patients who underwent surgery, 129 528 were operated on by female surgeons (5.7%) and 2 158 751 were by male surgeons (94.3%). Patients treated by female surgeons experienced a lower long-term mortality rate compared with those treated by male surgeons (adjusted 90-day mortality rates, 2.6% for female surgeons vs 3.0% for male surgeons; adjusted risk difference [aRD], −0.3 percentage points [pp]; 95% CI, −0.5 pp to −0.2 pp; P &amp;lt; .001), similarly for both female and male patients. For female patients, the patient-surgeon gender concordance was associated with lower long-term readmission (adjusted 90-day readmission rates, 7.3% vs 7.7%; aRD, −0.4 pp; 95% CI, −0.7 pp to −0.2 pp; P = .001) and complication rates (adjusted 90-day complication rates, 12.2% vs 12.8%; aRD, −0.5 pp; 95% CI, −0.9 pp to −0.2 pp; P = .005). For male patients, long-term readmission and complication rates did not differ between patients treated by female vs male surgeons. Similar patterns were found between 90-day and 1-year patient outcomes.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, both female and male patients treated by female surgeons experienced lower long-term postoperative mortality rates compared with those treated by male surgeons. Patient-surgeon gender concordance was associated with lower long-term readmission and complication rates for female patients, but not for male patients. These patterns were observed only for elective procedures and may not be generalizable to other populations, such as younger patients.
美国外科医生性别和患者-外科医生性别一致性的长期术后结果
重要性有证据表明,医生性别和患者-医生性别一致有可能改善患者的预后,尤其是女性患者。目标比较外科医生性别和患者-外科医生性别是否一致对术后长期疗效的影响。设计、设置和参与者基于 2016 年至 2019 年 100%医疗保险付费服务报销数据开展了一项基于人群的横断面研究。数据分析在 2023 年 10 月 17 日至 2025 年 1 月 28 日期间进行。研究在美国的急症医院进行。参与者包括年龄在 65 岁至 99 岁之间、接受过 14 种选择性或紧急手术中的一种手术的医疗保险付费服务受益人。主要结果和测量指标按外科医生性别和患者与外科医生性别一致性比较术后 90 天和 1 年的死亡率、再入院率和并发症发生率。研究小组对患者和外科医生的特征以及医院的固定效应进行了调整,有效地比较了同一医院内的患者。结果在接受手术的 2 288 279 名患者中,129 528 名患者由女医生(5.7%)进行手术,2 158 751 名患者由男医生(94.3%)进行手术。由女医生治疗的患者的长期死亡率低于由男医生治疗的患者(调整后的90天死亡率,女医生为2.6%,男医生为3.0%;调整后的风险差异[aRD],-0.3个百分点[pp];95% CI,-0.5 pp至-0.2 pp;P &amp;lt;.001),男女患者的情况类似。对于女性患者,患者与外科医生性别一致与较低的长期再入院率(调整后的90天再入院率为7.3% vs 7.7%;aRD,-0.4 pp;95% CI,-0.7 pp至-0.2 pp;P = .001)和并发症发生率(调整后的90天并发症发生率为12.2% vs 12.8%;aRD,-0.5 pp;95% CI,-0.9 pp至-0.2 pp;P = .005)相关。在男性患者中,由女性外科医生与男性外科医生治疗的患者的长期再入院率和并发症发生率没有差异。在这项研究中,由女性外科医生治疗的女性和男性患者的术后长期死亡率均低于由男性外科医生治疗的患者。患者与外科医生性别一致与女性患者的长期再入院率和并发症发生率较低有关,但与男性患者无关。这些模式仅在择期手术中观察到,可能无法推广到其他人群,如年轻患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信