Comparison of the diagnostic value of [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging in different types of pleural and peritoneal metastatic tumors
IF 8.6 1区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Huajun Liu, Junzheng Wang, Yang Ji, Xinyi Lin, Kan Wang, Zhihan Yao, Min Wang, Chunyin Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of the diagnostic value of [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging in different types of pleural and peritoneal metastatic tumors","authors":"Huajun Liu, Junzheng Wang, Yang Ji, Xinyi Lin, Kan Wang, Zhihan Yao, Min Wang, Chunyin Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07265-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>To compare the diagnostic value of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT and [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT imaging in different types of pleural/peritoneal metastatic tumors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent both [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT in our department between January 2022 and November 2024. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak SUV (SUVpeak), and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of pleural/peritoneal metastatic lesions were measured, and the results obtained from the two imaging modalities were compared.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 92 patients suspected of having pleural/peritoneal metastases were included in the study. The [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT showed higher SUVmax, SUVpeak, TBR, and sensitivity compared to [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT (7.87 vs. 6.28; <i>P</i> = 0.002; 5.88 vs. 4.65; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 6.27 vs. 3.85; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 95.3% vs. 84.7%; <i>P</i> = 0.035), especially for peritoneal metastases (8.25 vs. 5.75; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 6.18 vs. 4.29; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 6.54 vs. 3.50; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Among various tumors, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT showed better detection results for hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors (7.88 vs. 6.02, 5.88 vs. 4.33, 6.15 vs. 3.67), gastrointestinal tumors (8.27 vs. 5.69, 6.28 vs. 4.30, 7.03 vs. 3.50), and adenocarcinomas (8.30 vs. 5.80, 6.17 vs. 4.30, 6.60 vs. 3.55).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>For pleural/peritoneal metastases, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT has a higher detection rate compared to [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET/CT, providing better diagnostic efficacy, particularly for peritoneal metastases. Among various tumors, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT has higher diagnostic value in hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors, gastrointestinal tumors, and adenocarcinomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07265-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare the diagnostic value of [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/CT imaging in different types of pleural/peritoneal metastatic tumors.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent both [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT in our department between January 2022 and November 2024. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak SUV (SUVpeak), and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of pleural/peritoneal metastatic lesions were measured, and the results obtained from the two imaging modalities were compared.
Results
A total of 92 patients suspected of having pleural/peritoneal metastases were included in the study. The [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT showed higher SUVmax, SUVpeak, TBR, and sensitivity compared to [18F]-FDG PET/CT (7.87 vs. 6.28; P = 0.002; 5.88 vs. 4.65; P < 0.001; 6.27 vs. 3.85; P < 0.001; 95.3% vs. 84.7%; P = 0.035), especially for peritoneal metastases (8.25 vs. 5.75; P < 0.001; 6.18 vs. 4.29; P < 0.001; 6.54 vs. 3.50; P < 0.001). Among various tumors, [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT showed better detection results for hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors (7.88 vs. 6.02, 5.88 vs. 4.33, 6.15 vs. 3.67), gastrointestinal tumors (8.27 vs. 5.69, 6.28 vs. 4.30, 7.03 vs. 3.50), and adenocarcinomas (8.30 vs. 5.80, 6.17 vs. 4.30, 6.60 vs. 3.55).
Conclusion
For pleural/peritoneal metastases, [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT has a higher detection rate compared to [18F]-FDG PET/CT, providing better diagnostic efficacy, particularly for peritoneal metastases. Among various tumors, [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT has higher diagnostic value in hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors, gastrointestinal tumors, and adenocarcinomas.
目的比较[68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT与[18F]-FDG PET/CT对不同类型胸膜/腹膜转移性肿瘤的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析我科2022年1月至2024年11月同时行[18F]-FDG和[68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT的患者。测量胸膜/腹膜转移灶的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)、峰值SUV (SUVpeak)和肿瘤与背景比(TBR),并比较两种成像方式的结果。结果共纳入92例疑似胸膜/腹膜转移患者。与[18F]-FDG PET/CT相比,[68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT显示出更高的SUVmax、SUVpeak、TBR和灵敏度(7.87 vs. 6.28;p = 0.002;5.88 vs. 4.65;P < 0.001;6.27 vs. 3.85;P < 0.001;95.3% vs. 84.7%;P = 0.035),尤其是腹膜转移(8.25 vs. 5.75;P < 0.001;6.18 vs. 4.29;P < 0.001;6.54 vs. 3.50;P < 0.001)。在各种肿瘤中,[68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT对肝胆、胰腺肿瘤(7.88 vs. 6.02、5.88 vs. 4.33、6.15 vs. 3.67)、胃肠道肿瘤(8.27 vs. 5.69、6.28 vs. 4.30、7.03 vs. 3.50)、腺癌(8.30 vs. 5.80、6.17 vs. 4.30、6.60 vs. 3.55)的检测效果较好。结论[68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT对胸膜/腹膜转移瘤的检出率高于[18F]-FDG PET/CT,诊断效果更好,尤其是对腹膜转移瘤。在各种肿瘤中,[68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT对肝胆胰肿瘤、胃肠道肿瘤、腺癌具有较高的诊断价值。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.