Bone Bruise Patterns After Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Differ Between Alpine Skiers and Pivoting Sports Athletes.

Steffen T Ubl,Romed P Vieider,Jesse Seilern Und Aspang,Steffen F Siemoneit,Thomas R Pfeiffer,Christian Gaebler,Hannes Platzgummer
{"title":"Bone Bruise Patterns After Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Differ Between Alpine Skiers and Pivoting Sports Athletes.","authors":"Steffen T Ubl,Romed P Vieider,Jesse Seilern Und Aspang,Steffen F Siemoneit,Thomas R Pfeiffer,Christian Gaebler,Hannes Platzgummer","doi":"10.1177/03635465251332272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nConcomitant injuries after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear differ between sports, which may be related to divergent loading patterns. Bone bruises (BBs) can provide insight into the biomechanical injury mechanism.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS\r\nThe purpose of this study was to compare BB patterns and concomitant injuries after noncontact ACL tears between pivoting sports athletes and alpine skiers. It was hypothesized that pivoting sports athletes would have a higher prevalence and depth of BBs and a higher prevalence of concomitant injuries.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 446 consecutive patients with ACL injuries between December 2016 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with contact injuries, an injury mechanism other than alpine skiing or pivoting sports, missing magnetic resonance imaging, failed previous nonoperative treatment, open physes, or incomplete ACL tears were excluded. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to classify BB location and depth as well as concomitant meniscal and collateral ligament injuries. There were 2 groups (alpine skiers vs pivoting sports athletes) that were propensity score matched for age, body mass index, and sex. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to detect differences, with significance set at P < .05. The Fleiss kappa (κ) was used to assess observer agreement.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPropensity score matching of 122 included patients resulted in 27 patients per group. Pivoting sports athletes showed a higher prevalence of BBs in the lateral femoral condyle than alpine skiers (85.2% vs 51.9%, respectively; P = .008). No significant differences were found for BB prevalence in other anatomic locations, BB depth, and concomitant meniscal and collateral ligament injuries. Post hoc power analysis showed a power of 75%. Observer agreement was almost perfect for BB prevalence (κ = 0.95-1.00), substantial for BB depth (κ = 0.68-0.75), and substantial to almost perfect for concomitant injuries (κ = 0.64-0.94).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe prevalence of BBs in the lateral femoral condyle was higher in pivoting sports athletes than in alpine skiers after acute noncontact ACL tears. This suggests that ACL injuries in pivoting sports are associated with higher lateral compression forces in a pivot-shift mechanism, whereas anterior tibial translation and tibial rotation may be the predominant loading pattern in alpine skiing.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"3635465251332272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251332272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Concomitant injuries after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear differ between sports, which may be related to divergent loading patterns. Bone bruises (BBs) can provide insight into the biomechanical injury mechanism. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose of this study was to compare BB patterns and concomitant injuries after noncontact ACL tears between pivoting sports athletes and alpine skiers. It was hypothesized that pivoting sports athletes would have a higher prevalence and depth of BBs and a higher prevalence of concomitant injuries. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS A total of 446 consecutive patients with ACL injuries between December 2016 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with contact injuries, an injury mechanism other than alpine skiing or pivoting sports, missing magnetic resonance imaging, failed previous nonoperative treatment, open physes, or incomplete ACL tears were excluded. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to classify BB location and depth as well as concomitant meniscal and collateral ligament injuries. There were 2 groups (alpine skiers vs pivoting sports athletes) that were propensity score matched for age, body mass index, and sex. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to detect differences, with significance set at P < .05. The Fleiss kappa (κ) was used to assess observer agreement. RESULTS Propensity score matching of 122 included patients resulted in 27 patients per group. Pivoting sports athletes showed a higher prevalence of BBs in the lateral femoral condyle than alpine skiers (85.2% vs 51.9%, respectively; P = .008). No significant differences were found for BB prevalence in other anatomic locations, BB depth, and concomitant meniscal and collateral ligament injuries. Post hoc power analysis showed a power of 75%. Observer agreement was almost perfect for BB prevalence (κ = 0.95-1.00), substantial for BB depth (κ = 0.68-0.75), and substantial to almost perfect for concomitant injuries (κ = 0.64-0.94). CONCLUSION The prevalence of BBs in the lateral femoral condyle was higher in pivoting sports athletes than in alpine skiers after acute noncontact ACL tears. This suggests that ACL injuries in pivoting sports are associated with higher lateral compression forces in a pivot-shift mechanism, whereas anterior tibial translation and tibial rotation may be the predominant loading pattern in alpine skiing.
非接触性前交叉韧带撕裂后的骨挫伤模式在高山滑雪运动员和旋转运动运动员之间存在差异。
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂后的伴随损伤因运动而异,这可能与不同的负荷模式有关。骨挫伤(BBs)可以提供深入了解生物力学损伤机制。目的/假设本研究的目的是比较旋转运动运动员和高山滑雪者非接触性前交叉韧带撕裂后的BB模式和伴随损伤。假设运动运动员的脑BBs患病率和深度更高,伴随损伤的患病率更高。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法回顾性分析2016年12月至2020年11月连续446例ACL损伤患者的临床资料。排除了接触性损伤、非高山滑雪或旋转运动损伤机制、磁共振成像缺失、既往非手术治疗失败、开放性物理或不完全性前交叉韧带撕裂的患者。采用磁共振成像对BB的位置、深度以及伴发的半月板和副韧带损伤进行分类。有两组(高山滑雪运动员和旋转运动运动员)倾向得分与年龄、体重指数和性别相匹配。采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验检验差异,显著性P < 0.05。采用Fleiss kappa (κ)来评估观察者的一致性。结果对122例纳入的患者进行倾向评分匹配,每组27例。旋转运动运动员股骨外侧髁的BBs患病率高于高山滑雪者(分别为85.2%和51.9%);P = .008)。在其他解剖部位、BB深度以及伴随的半月板和副韧带损伤方面,没有发现BB患病率的显著差异。事后功效分析显示功效为75%。对于BB患病率(κ = 0.95-1.00)、BB深度(κ = 0.68-0.75)和伴发损伤(κ = 0.64-0.94),观察者的一致性几乎是完美的。结论在急性非接触性前交叉韧带撕裂后,旋转运动运动员股骨外侧髁的BBs患病率高于高山滑雪运动员。这表明,在旋转运动中,前交叉韧带损伤与轴向移位机制中较高的侧压力有关,而在高山滑雪中,胫骨前平移和胫骨旋转可能是主要的负荷模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信