Validation of a Composite Outcome Score for Assessing Return to Sports After Achilles Tendon Repair.

Ronny Lopes,Kinan Freiha,Michael R Carmont,Eugénie Valentin,Kylian Alvino,Mohamed Mousa,Gauthier Rauline,François Fourchet,Brice Picot,Alexandre Hardy
{"title":"Validation of a Composite Outcome Score for Assessing Return to Sports After Achilles Tendon Repair.","authors":"Ronny Lopes,Kinan Freiha,Michael R Carmont,Eugénie Valentin,Kylian Alvino,Mohamed Mousa,Gauthier Rauline,François Fourchet,Brice Picot,Alexandre Hardy","doi":"10.1177/03635465251333142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe Ankle-GO is a composite outcome score based on 4 functional tests and 2 patient-reported outcome measures. It was initially described and validated for its ability to predict return to sports (RTS) at the same level of play after lateral ankle sprains.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS\r\nThe main aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Ankle-GO in patients after Achilles tendon repair. The second objective was to evaluate its ability to predict RTS at the same level of play. It was hypothesized that this composite outcome score is a valid and reliable tool that is able to discriminate and predict the level of RTS at 9 months after Achilles tendon repair.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nCase-control study; Level of evidence, 3.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a prospective multicenter study. Patients who were active in sports and underwent primary acute Achilles tendon repair between April 2021 and December 2022 were included. A control group comprising 30 participants with no history of lower limb injuries was also evaluated. After standard rehabilitation for the first 2 months, the Ankle-GO was administered at 6 and 9 months after repair by the same experienced physical therapist. During testing, the patients were asked whether they were able to practice their main sport again and, if so, whether at the same or a lower level of play. A comparison between control participants and patients at 9 months after surgery was performed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 50 patients (24 women and 26 men), with a mean age of 38.3 ± 10.1 years, were included. No patients were lost to follow-up at 9 months. The Ankle-GO score at 6 months was 10.7 ± 4.8. At 9 months, the score had risen by 4.8 points. All participants scored above the minimum threshold. The minimum score achieved was 3 points (n = 5 [10%]). Only 1 patient (2%) obtained the maximum score (25 points). There was a significant difference in the Ankle-GO score between patients at 6 and 9 months and between control participants and patients at 9 months after Achilles tendon repair. Of the 50 patients included in the study, 14 (28%) returned to their preinjury level of sport at 9 months. The ability of the Ankle-GO score at 6 months to predict RTS at the preinjury level at 9 months was good (area under the curve = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.56-0.85]; P < .01). A Youden index of 0.42 was observed for a cut-off score of 8 points, which corresponds to a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 41.2%.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe Ankle-GO is a valid tool to evaluate and discriminate patients during the RTS continuum after Achilles tendon repair and to predict RTS at the same level at 9 months after surgery. This composite outcome score assesses ankle function and the patient's psychological readiness to avoid premature RTS and worsening of the injury. Further studies are needed to assess its value in identifying and predicting patients at risk of a recurrence.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"219 1","pages":"3635465251333142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251333142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Ankle-GO is a composite outcome score based on 4 functional tests and 2 patient-reported outcome measures. It was initially described and validated for its ability to predict return to sports (RTS) at the same level of play after lateral ankle sprains. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The main aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Ankle-GO in patients after Achilles tendon repair. The second objective was to evaluate its ability to predict RTS at the same level of play. It was hypothesized that this composite outcome score is a valid and reliable tool that is able to discriminate and predict the level of RTS at 9 months after Achilles tendon repair. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS This was a prospective multicenter study. Patients who were active in sports and underwent primary acute Achilles tendon repair between April 2021 and December 2022 were included. A control group comprising 30 participants with no history of lower limb injuries was also evaluated. After standard rehabilitation for the first 2 months, the Ankle-GO was administered at 6 and 9 months after repair by the same experienced physical therapist. During testing, the patients were asked whether they were able to practice their main sport again and, if so, whether at the same or a lower level of play. A comparison between control participants and patients at 9 months after surgery was performed. RESULTS A total of 50 patients (24 women and 26 men), with a mean age of 38.3 ± 10.1 years, were included. No patients were lost to follow-up at 9 months. The Ankle-GO score at 6 months was 10.7 ± 4.8. At 9 months, the score had risen by 4.8 points. All participants scored above the minimum threshold. The minimum score achieved was 3 points (n = 5 [10%]). Only 1 patient (2%) obtained the maximum score (25 points). There was a significant difference in the Ankle-GO score between patients at 6 and 9 months and between control participants and patients at 9 months after Achilles tendon repair. Of the 50 patients included in the study, 14 (28%) returned to their preinjury level of sport at 9 months. The ability of the Ankle-GO score at 6 months to predict RTS at the preinjury level at 9 months was good (area under the curve = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.56-0.85]; P < .01). A Youden index of 0.42 was observed for a cut-off score of 8 points, which corresponds to a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 41.2%. CONCLUSION The Ankle-GO is a valid tool to evaluate and discriminate patients during the RTS continuum after Achilles tendon repair and to predict RTS at the same level at 9 months after surgery. This composite outcome score assesses ankle function and the patient's psychological readiness to avoid premature RTS and worsening of the injury. Further studies are needed to assess its value in identifying and predicting patients at risk of a recurrence.
评估跟腱修复后恢复运动的综合结果评分的验证。
背景Ankle GO是基于4项功能测试和2项患者报告的结果指标的综合结果评分。最初,它被描述并验证了其预测踝关节外侧扭伤后在相同比赛水平下恢复运动(RTS)的能力。目的/假设本研究的主要目的是评估跟腱修复后患者踝关节GO的心理测量学特性。第二个目标是评估其在相同游戏水平下预测RTS的能力。假设该综合结果评分是一种有效可靠的工具,能够区分和预测跟腱修复后9个月的RTS水平。研究设计案例对照研究;证据水平,3.方法这是一项前瞻性多中心研究。纳入2021年4月至2022年12月期间积极运动并接受原发性急性跟腱修复的患者。还对由30名无下肢损伤史的参与者组成的对照组进行了评估。在前2个月的标准康复后,同一位经验丰富的理疗师在修复后的6个月和9个月进行了踝关节GO治疗。在测试过程中,患者被问及是否能够再次练习他们的主要运动,如果可以,是在相同的水平还是较低的水平上。在手术后9个月,对对照组参与者和患者进行了比较。结果共纳入50名患者(24名女性和26名男性),平均年龄为38.3±10.1岁。9个月时,没有患者失访。6个月时踝关节GO评分为10.7±4.8。9个月时,得分上升了4.8分。所有参与者的得分均高于最低阈值。最低得分为3分(n=5[10%])。只有1名患者(2%)获得了最高分(25分)。跟腱修复术后6个月和9个月的患者之间以及对照组参与者和患者之间的踝关节GO评分存在显著差异。在纳入研究的50名患者中,14名(28%)在9个月时恢复到损伤前的运动水平。6个月时踝关节GO评分预测9个月时损伤前水平RTS的能力良好(曲线下面积=0.71[95%CI,0.56-0.85];P<0.01)。观察到尤登指数为0.42,临界分数为8分,对应于81.8%的敏感性和41.2%的特异性。结论踝关节GO是一种有效的工具,可以在跟腱修复后的RTS连续体中评估和区分患者,并在手术后9个月预测相同水平的RTS。该综合结果评分评估踝关节功能和患者避免过早RTS和损伤恶化的心理准备情况。需要进一步的研究来评估其在识别和预测复发风险患者方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信