MRI Distance Measures as a Predictor of Subsequent Clinical Status During the Preclinical Phase of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Xinyi Zhang, Brian S. Caffo, Anja Soldan, Corinne Pettigrew, Erus Guray, Christos Davatzikos, John C. Morris, Tammie L. S. Benzinger, Sterling C. Johnson, Colin L. Masters, Jurgen Fripp, Susan M. Resnick, Murat Bilgel, Walter A. Kukull, Marilyn S. Albert, Zheyu Wang
{"title":"MRI Distance Measures as a Predictor of Subsequent Clinical Status During the Preclinical Phase of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders","authors":"Xinyi Zhang,&nbsp;Brian S. Caffo,&nbsp;Anja Soldan,&nbsp;Corinne Pettigrew,&nbsp;Erus Guray,&nbsp;Christos Davatzikos,&nbsp;John C. Morris,&nbsp;Tammie L. S. Benzinger,&nbsp;Sterling C. Johnson,&nbsp;Colin L. Masters,&nbsp;Jurgen Fripp,&nbsp;Susan M. Resnick,&nbsp;Murat Bilgel,&nbsp;Walter A. Kukull,&nbsp;Marilyn S. Albert,&nbsp;Zheyu Wang","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Brain atrophy over time, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has been shown to predict subsequent cognitive impairment among individuals who were cognitively normal when first evaluated, indicating that subtle brain atrophy associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) may begin years before clinical symptoms appear. Traditionally, atrophy has been quantified by differences in brain volume or thickness over a specified timeframe. Research indicates that the rate of atrophy varies across different brain regions, which themselves exhibit complex spatial and hierarchical organizations. These characteristics collectively emphasize the need for diverse summary measures that can effectively capture the multidimensional nature of degeneration. In this study, we explore the use of distance measurements to quantify brain volumetric changes using processed MRI data from the Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (PAC). We conducted a series of analyses to predict future diagnostic status by modeling MRI trajectories for participants who were cognitively normal at baseline and either remained cognitively normal or progressed to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) over time, with adjustments for age, sex, education, and APOE genotype. We consider multiple distance measures and brain regions through a two-step approach. First, we build base models by fitting individual mixed-effect models for each distance metric and brain region pairing, using follow-up diagnosis (normal vs. MCI) as the outcome and volumetric changes from the baseline, as summarized by a given distance measure, as predictors. The second step aggregates these individual region-distance base models to derive an overall estimate of diagnostic status. Our analyses showed that the distance measures approach consistently outperformed the traditional direct volumetric approach in terms of predictive accuracy, both in individual base models and the aggregated models. This work highlights the potential advantage of using distance measures over the traditional direct volumetric approach to capture the multidimensional aspects of atrophy in the development of AD and related disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain atrophy over time, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has been shown to predict subsequent cognitive impairment among individuals who were cognitively normal when first evaluated, indicating that subtle brain atrophy associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) may begin years before clinical symptoms appear. Traditionally, atrophy has been quantified by differences in brain volume or thickness over a specified timeframe. Research indicates that the rate of atrophy varies across different brain regions, which themselves exhibit complex spatial and hierarchical organizations. These characteristics collectively emphasize the need for diverse summary measures that can effectively capture the multidimensional nature of degeneration. In this study, we explore the use of distance measurements to quantify brain volumetric changes using processed MRI data from the Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (PAC). We conducted a series of analyses to predict future diagnostic status by modeling MRI trajectories for participants who were cognitively normal at baseline and either remained cognitively normal or progressed to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) over time, with adjustments for age, sex, education, and APOE genotype. We consider multiple distance measures and brain regions through a two-step approach. First, we build base models by fitting individual mixed-effect models for each distance metric and brain region pairing, using follow-up diagnosis (normal vs. MCI) as the outcome and volumetric changes from the baseline, as summarized by a given distance measure, as predictors. The second step aggregates these individual region-distance base models to derive an overall estimate of diagnostic status. Our analyses showed that the distance measures approach consistently outperformed the traditional direct volumetric approach in terms of predictive accuracy, both in individual base models and the aggregated models. This work highlights the potential advantage of using distance measures over the traditional direct volumetric approach to capture the multidimensional aspects of atrophy in the development of AD and related disorders.

Abstract Image

MRI距离测量作为阿尔茨海默病和相关疾病临床前阶段后续临床状态的预测因子
随着时间的推移,通过磁共振成像(MRI)测量的脑萎缩已被证明可以预测在首次评估时认知正常的个体随后的认知障碍,这表明与阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关的轻微脑萎缩可能在临床症状出现前几年就开始了。传统上,萎缩是通过在特定时间内脑容量或厚度的差异来量化的。研究表明,不同脑区萎缩的速度不同,而脑区本身表现出复杂的空间和层次组织。这些特征共同强调需要多种综合措施,以有效地捕捉退化的多维性质。在这项研究中,我们利用临床前阿尔茨海默病协会(PAC)处理过的MRI数据,探索了使用距离测量来量化脑容量变化的方法。我们进行了一系列分析,通过对基线认知正常、认知保持正常或随着时间发展为轻度认知障碍(MCI)的参与者的MRI轨迹建模,并根据年龄、性别、教育程度和APOE基因型进行调整,来预测未来的诊断状态。我们通过两步方法考虑多个距离测量和大脑区域。首先,我们通过拟合每个距离度量和脑区域配对的个体混合效应模型来构建基础模型,使用随访诊断(正常vs. MCI)作为结果,并使用从基线开始的体积变化,通过给定的距离度量作为预测因子。第二步汇总这些单独的区域距离基础模型,得出诊断状态的总体估计。我们的分析表明,距离测量方法在预测精度方面始终优于传统的直接体积方法,无论是在单个基础模型还是聚合模型中。这项工作强调了使用距离测量的潜在优势,而不是传统的直接体积测量方法来捕捉阿尔茨海默病和相关疾病发展中萎缩的多维方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信