{"title":"Modelling the Effectiveness of Vegetative Nature-Based Solutions for Coastal Flood Risk Mitigation","authors":"Yengi Emmanuel Daro Justine, Avidesh Seenath","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional grey solutions, such as seawalls, are increasingly recognised as being unsustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, due to high costs and negative environmental impacts. In response, vegetative nature-based coastal solutions (NBCS), such as saltmarshes, are being increasingly proposed as a more sustainable alternative with wider environmental benefits. However, there is considerable uncertainty on the longevity of such solutions under sea-level rise. We, therefore, examine the effectiveness of vegetative NBCS for mitigating coastal flood risk through scenario modelling using a verified <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mtext>LISFLOOD-FP</mtext>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ LISFLOOD\\hbox{-} FP $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> model for Absecon Island in New Jersey, USA. Specifically, we simulate various experimental vegetative NBCS scenarios, each designed to represent a saltmarsh system (young, mid-age, and old), under alternative sea-level conditions. Our results show that these solutions have a marginal influence on flood extent, depth, velocity, and timing under current and future projected sea-level conditions. These findings suggest that reliance on vegetative NBCS <i>may not</i> be sustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, particularly under climate change. We discuss the wider implications of these findings and identify future research pathways towards improving and informing more robust coastal flood risk management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditional grey solutions, such as seawalls, are increasingly recognised as being unsustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, due to high costs and negative environmental impacts. In response, vegetative nature-based coastal solutions (NBCS), such as saltmarshes, are being increasingly proposed as a more sustainable alternative with wider environmental benefits. However, there is considerable uncertainty on the longevity of such solutions under sea-level rise. We, therefore, examine the effectiveness of vegetative NBCS for mitigating coastal flood risk through scenario modelling using a verified model for Absecon Island in New Jersey, USA. Specifically, we simulate various experimental vegetative NBCS scenarios, each designed to represent a saltmarsh system (young, mid-age, and old), under alternative sea-level conditions. Our results show that these solutions have a marginal influence on flood extent, depth, velocity, and timing under current and future projected sea-level conditions. These findings suggest that reliance on vegetative NBCS may not be sustainable for long-term coastal flood risk management, particularly under climate change. We discuss the wider implications of these findings and identify future research pathways towards improving and informing more robust coastal flood risk management decisions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind.
Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.