Exploring Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Usage Among Non-Diabetic Healthcare Providers: A Cross-Sectional Multi-Country Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Abdulqadir J. Nashwan, Hana J. Abukhadijah, Vidusha Karavadi, Ibrahim Aqtam, Anas Ibraheem, Prakash Palanivelu, Mahmoud A. Khedr, Abdulkarim O. Agga, Obaid Ur Rehman, Eeshal Fatima, Mohammad A. Abu Asal, Rana Abutaima, Marwa M. Shaban, Mostafa Shaban, Muna Barakat, Nasser M. Aldosari, Albara M. Alomari, Adham A. Aljariri, Nabeel F. Al-Lobaney, Mutaz I. Othman, Ahmad A. Abujaber, Kholoud Bastaki
{"title":"Exploring Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Usage Among Non-Diabetic Healthcare Providers: A Cross-Sectional Multi-Country Study","authors":"Abdulqadir J. Nashwan,&nbsp;Hana J. Abukhadijah,&nbsp;Vidusha Karavadi,&nbsp;Ibrahim Aqtam,&nbsp;Anas Ibraheem,&nbsp;Prakash Palanivelu,&nbsp;Mahmoud A. Khedr,&nbsp;Abdulkarim O. Agga,&nbsp;Obaid Ur Rehman,&nbsp;Eeshal Fatima,&nbsp;Mohammad A. Abu Asal,&nbsp;Rana Abutaima,&nbsp;Marwa M. Shaban,&nbsp;Mostafa Shaban,&nbsp;Muna Barakat,&nbsp;Nasser M. Aldosari,&nbsp;Albara M. Alomari,&nbsp;Adham A. Aljariri,&nbsp;Nabeel F. Al-Lobaney,&nbsp;Mutaz I. Othman,&nbsp;Ahmad A. Abujaber,&nbsp;Kholoud Bastaki","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) were initially developed for type 2 diabetes but have gained widespread use for weight management, including among non-diabetic individuals. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of GLP-1RA use, describe usage patterns, and explore healthcare providers' (HCPs) perceptions of their efficacy and safety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 657 HCPs from 10 countries using a structured online survey between September and December 2023. Convenience sampling was employed, statistical analyses were performed using STATA 17. Associations between demographic characteristics and perceptions of GLP-1RAs were analyzed using the chi-square test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 657 HCPs, 59.2% were female and 40.8% were male, with a median age of 36.0 years (IQR: 29.0–44.0) and a median BMI of 26.7 (IQR: 23.8–30.7). Among professional groups, nurses accounted for 44.7%, followed by physicians (36.2%) and allied health professionals (18.7%). Semaglutide (45.7%, 95% CI: 41.8%−49.5%) was the most commonly used GLP-1RA, followed by Liraglutide (36.9%, 95% CI: 33.2%−40.8%). Other GLP-1RAs were used less frequently, including Dulaglutide (17.0%, 95% CI: 14.2%−20.1%), Exenatide (14.1%, 95% CI: 11.5%−17.0%), Albiglutide (7.0%, 95% CI: 5.1%−9.2%), and Lixisenatide (8.5%, 95% CI: 6.5%−10.9%. Regarding perceived safety, 68.6% considered GLP-1RAs safe. Safety perceptions were significantly associated with educational level (<i>p</i> = 0.022), with participants holding higher degrees being more likely to perceive GLP-1RAs as unsafe (18.3%) compared to those with a bachelor's degree or lower (10.8%). No associations were found with age (<i>p</i> = 0.487), sex (<i>p</i> = 0.729), or BMI (<i>p</i> = 0.089). Similarly, 73.5% of participants considered GLP-1RAs effective for perceived efficacy. No associations were found with sex (<i>p</i> = 0.663) or BMI (<i>p</i> = 0.446). Older participants (<i>p</i> = 0.011) and those with higher education (<i>p</i> = 0.006) were more likely to perceive GLP-1RAs as ineffective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides the first prevalence estimate of GLP-1RA use among HCPs and GLP1-Ras users and explores the associations between demographic characteristics and perceptions of safety and efficacy. The findings highlight the self-prescribing practices of these medications for weight management and underscore the need for appropriate monitoring to avoid potential health risks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70638","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) were initially developed for type 2 diabetes but have gained widespread use for weight management, including among non-diabetic individuals. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of GLP-1RA use, describe usage patterns, and explore healthcare providers' (HCPs) perceptions of their efficacy and safety.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 657 HCPs from 10 countries using a structured online survey between September and December 2023. Convenience sampling was employed, statistical analyses were performed using STATA 17. Associations between demographic characteristics and perceptions of GLP-1RAs were analyzed using the chi-square test.

Results

Among 657 HCPs, 59.2% were female and 40.8% were male, with a median age of 36.0 years (IQR: 29.0–44.0) and a median BMI of 26.7 (IQR: 23.8–30.7). Among professional groups, nurses accounted for 44.7%, followed by physicians (36.2%) and allied health professionals (18.7%). Semaglutide (45.7%, 95% CI: 41.8%−49.5%) was the most commonly used GLP-1RA, followed by Liraglutide (36.9%, 95% CI: 33.2%−40.8%). Other GLP-1RAs were used less frequently, including Dulaglutide (17.0%, 95% CI: 14.2%−20.1%), Exenatide (14.1%, 95% CI: 11.5%−17.0%), Albiglutide (7.0%, 95% CI: 5.1%−9.2%), and Lixisenatide (8.5%, 95% CI: 6.5%−10.9%. Regarding perceived safety, 68.6% considered GLP-1RAs safe. Safety perceptions were significantly associated with educational level (p = 0.022), with participants holding higher degrees being more likely to perceive GLP-1RAs as unsafe (18.3%) compared to those with a bachelor's degree or lower (10.8%). No associations were found with age (p = 0.487), sex (p = 0.729), or BMI (p = 0.089). Similarly, 73.5% of participants considered GLP-1RAs effective for perceived efficacy. No associations were found with sex (p = 0.663) or BMI (p = 0.446). Older participants (p = 0.011) and those with higher education (p = 0.006) were more likely to perceive GLP-1RAs as ineffective.

Conclusion

This study provides the first prevalence estimate of GLP-1RA use among HCPs and GLP1-Ras users and explores the associations between demographic characteristics and perceptions of safety and efficacy. The findings highlight the self-prescribing practices of these medications for weight management and underscore the need for appropriate monitoring to avoid potential health risks.

探索胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在非糖尿病医疗保健提供者中的使用:一项横断面多国研究
背景和目的胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)最初是为2型糖尿病开发的,但已广泛用于体重管理,包括非糖尿病患者。本研究旨在估计GLP-1RA使用的流行程度,描述使用模式,并探讨医疗保健提供者(HCPs)对其有效性和安全性的看法。方法采用结构化在线调查方法,对来自10个国家的657名HCPs进行横断面研究。采用方便抽样,采用stata17进行统计分析。人口统计学特征与GLP-1RAs感知之间的关系采用卡方检验进行分析。结果657例HCPs中,女性59.2%,男性40.8%,中位年龄36.0岁(IQR: 29.0 ~ 44.0),中位BMI 26.7 (IQR: 23.8 ~ 30.7)。在专业群体中,护士占44.7%,其次是医生(36.2%)和专职卫生专业人员(18.7%)。Semaglutide (45.7%, 95% CI: 41.8% ~ 49.5%)是最常用的GLP-1RA,其次是利拉鲁肽(36.9%,95% CI: 33.2% ~ 40.8%)。其他GLP-1RAs较少使用,包括杜拉鲁肽(17.0%,95% CI: 14.2% ~ 20.1%)、艾塞那肽(14.1%,95% CI: 11.5% ~ 17.0%)、阿比鲁肽(7.0%,95% CI: 5.1% ~ 9.2%)和利昔那肽(8.5%,95% CI: 6.5% ~ 10.9%)。在感知安全性方面,68.6%的人认为GLP-1RAs是安全的。安全感知与教育水平显著相关(p = 0.022),与学士学位或更低学位的参与者(10.8%)相比,拥有更高学位的参与者更有可能认为GLP-1RAs不安全(18.3%)。与年龄(p = 0.487)、性别(p = 0.729)或BMI (p = 0.089)均无关联。同样,73.5%的参与者认为GLP-1RAs对感知疗效有效。与性别(p = 0.663)或BMI (p = 0.446)无关联。年龄较大的参与者(p = 0.011)和受过高等教育的参与者(p = 0.006)更有可能认为GLP-1RAs无效。本研究首次提供了HCPs和GLP1-Ras使用者中GLP-1RA使用的患病率估计,并探讨了人口统计学特征与安全性和有效性认知之间的关系。研究结果强调了这些药物在体重管理方面的自我处方做法,并强调了适当监测以避免潜在健康风险的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信