Wildfire-Induced Enhancement in Downstream Flood Discharge in Watersheds of California

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wasitha Dilshan, Yusuke Hiraga, So Kazama
{"title":"Wildfire-Induced Enhancement in Downstream Flood Discharge in Watersheds of California","authors":"Wasitha Dilshan,&nbsp;Yusuke Hiraga,&nbsp;So Kazama","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global climate change is increasingly associated with the prevalence of extreme precipitation and large wildfires. The influence of large wildfires on downstream flood discharge is concerning, particularly from a flood risk management perspective, where understanding the impact at a watershed scale is still fairly limited. This study investigates the impacts of wildfires on downstream flood discharge in 30 Californian watersheds. We employed the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to simulate daily discharge over 20 years, achieving robust model performance <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values of 0.67–0.86 and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values of 0.65–0.86. The differences between the observed flood discharge volume and the simulated unburned scenario, including model errors (i.e., flood discharge enhancement), during the post-fire years were assessed. Substantial post-fire discharge increases, with an average 17.1% increment in 83.3% of watersheds, were found during the first post-fire year. Statistically significant positive correlations (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) were found between the enhancement in discharge volume and the percentage of burned watershed area. We quantified wildfire impacts by adjusting the curve number (CN) in the SWAT model, with CN values increasing by increments ranging from 16.5% to 30% of their original values, depending on burn severity and land use type. A novel relationship between wildfire area burned and CN increment could be described by the equation %CN increment = 0.39 × wildfire area burned % + β, which highlights the proportional increase in CN due to wildfire area burned. The study also showed that incorporating historical wildfire activity significantly raised the probable maximum flood, with discharge volume increases between 3.74% and 25.9%. These wildfire-induced increases are on par with California's climate change projections (10%–50%), underscoring the need to factor in wildfire effects in flood risk assessments and water management strategies at this type of location.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global climate change is increasingly associated with the prevalence of extreme precipitation and large wildfires. The influence of large wildfires on downstream flood discharge is concerning, particularly from a flood risk management perspective, where understanding the impact at a watershed scale is still fairly limited. This study investigates the impacts of wildfires on downstream flood discharge in 30 Californian watersheds. We employed the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to simulate daily discharge over 20 years, achieving robust model performance R2 values of 0.67–0.86 and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values of 0.65–0.86. The differences between the observed flood discharge volume and the simulated unburned scenario, including model errors (i.e., flood discharge enhancement), during the post-fire years were assessed. Substantial post-fire discharge increases, with an average 17.1% increment in 83.3% of watersheds, were found during the first post-fire year. Statistically significant positive correlations (p < 0.01) were found between the enhancement in discharge volume and the percentage of burned watershed area. We quantified wildfire impacts by adjusting the curve number (CN) in the SWAT model, with CN values increasing by increments ranging from 16.5% to 30% of their original values, depending on burn severity and land use type. A novel relationship between wildfire area burned and CN increment could be described by the equation %CN increment = 0.39 × wildfire area burned % + β, which highlights the proportional increase in CN due to wildfire area burned. The study also showed that incorporating historical wildfire activity significantly raised the probable maximum flood, with discharge volume increases between 3.74% and 25.9%. These wildfire-induced increases are on par with California's climate change projections (10%–50%), underscoring the need to factor in wildfire effects in flood risk assessments and water management strategies at this type of location.

Abstract Image

野火引起的加利福尼亚流域下游洪水流量增强
全球气候变化与极端降水和大型野火的流行日益相关。大型野火对下游洪水流量的影响令人担忧,特别是从洪水风险管理的角度来看,对流域规模的影响的了解仍然相当有限。本研究探讨野火对加州30个流域下游洪水流量的影响。采用土壤和水评估工具(SWAT)模拟20年的日排放量,得到稳健的模型性能R2值为0.67-0.86,Nash-Sutcliffe效率(NSE)值为0.65-0.86。评估了火灾后几年观测到的洪水流量与模拟的未燃烧情景之间的差异,包括模型误差(即洪水流量增强)。在火灾后的第一年,83.3%的流域的排放量平均增加了17.1%。径流量增加与流域燃烧面积百分比呈显著正相关(p < 0.01)。我们通过调整SWAT模型中的曲线数(CN)来量化野火影响,根据烧伤严重程度和土地利用类型,CN值增加了原始值的16.5%至30%。野火燃烧面积与CN增量之间的新关系可以用公式%CN增量= 0.39 ×野火燃烧面积% + β来描述,这突出了野火燃烧面积导致的CN成比例增加。研究还表明,纳入历史野火活动显著提高了可能的最大洪水,流量增加了3.74% ~ 25.9%。这些野火导致的增长与加州的气候变化预测(10%-50%)相当,强调了在这类地区的洪水风险评估和水管理策略中考虑野火影响的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信