The Use of Carbon Dots for Food Packaging and Preservation: Toxic or Beneficial?

IF 12 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Ruchir Priyadarshi, Zohreh Riahi, Ajahar Khan, Jong-Whan Rhim
{"title":"The Use of Carbon Dots for Food Packaging and Preservation: Toxic or Beneficial?","authors":"Ruchir Priyadarshi,&nbsp;Zohreh Riahi,&nbsp;Ajahar Khan,&nbsp;Jong-Whan Rhim","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Carbon dots (CDs), which are emerging as versatile nanomaterials, have gained interest in food packaging and preservation due to their sustainable origin and multifunctional characteristics, such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, and UV-protective properties. CDs can be synthesized from biomass and have been proposed as functional additives to packaging material to improve the safety and shelf life of the packaged food. Despite these benefits, concerns are raised about their potential toxicity when leached into foods, especially since they belong to the nanomaterial category. Interestingly, foodborne CDs, which are naturally formed in heat-processed foods and have been consumed by humans for centuries, add a new complexity to the debate. Although there is no definitive evidence linking these endogenous CDs to adverse health effects, some studies suggest their potential to interfere with metabolism in animal models. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances in thermally processed foods, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), may further complicate safety assessment. This review addresses the paradox of CD from food and packaging sources, highlighting its dual role as both a potentially toxic agent and a beneficial functional material. More extensive research is essential to fully understand the long-term effects of CD on human health and to determine whether its use in food packaging is truly safe or beneficial.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"24 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4337.70180","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon dots (CDs), which are emerging as versatile nanomaterials, have gained interest in food packaging and preservation due to their sustainable origin and multifunctional characteristics, such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, and UV-protective properties. CDs can be synthesized from biomass and have been proposed as functional additives to packaging material to improve the safety and shelf life of the packaged food. Despite these benefits, concerns are raised about their potential toxicity when leached into foods, especially since they belong to the nanomaterial category. Interestingly, foodborne CDs, which are naturally formed in heat-processed foods and have been consumed by humans for centuries, add a new complexity to the debate. Although there is no definitive evidence linking these endogenous CDs to adverse health effects, some studies suggest their potential to interfere with metabolism in animal models. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances in thermally processed foods, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), may further complicate safety assessment. This review addresses the paradox of CD from food and packaging sources, highlighting its dual role as both a potentially toxic agent and a beneficial functional material. More extensive research is essential to fully understand the long-term effects of CD on human health and to determine whether its use in food packaging is truly safe or beneficial.

将碳点用于食品包装和保存:有毒还是有益?
碳点(cd)是一种新兴的多用途纳米材料,由于其可持续来源和多功能特性,如抗菌、抗氧化和防紫外线性能,在食品包装和保存中引起了人们的兴趣。CDs可以从生物质中合成,并被提议作为包装材料的功能性添加剂,以提高包装食品的安全性和保质期。尽管有这些好处,但人们对它们在浸出到食物中时的潜在毒性提出了担忧,特别是因为它们属于纳米材料类别。有趣的是,食源性cd是在加热加工的食品中自然形成的,已经被人类食用了几个世纪,这给这场辩论增添了新的复杂性。虽然没有明确的证据表明这些内源性cd与不良健康影响有关,但一些研究表明,它们可能干扰动物模型中的代谢。此外,热加工食品中有害物质的存在,如多环芳烃(PAHs),可能会进一步复杂化安全评估。这篇综述解决了食品和包装来源的CD悖论,强调了它既是潜在的有毒物质又是有益的功能材料的双重作用。要充分了解乳糜泻对人类健康的长期影响,并确定在食品包装中使用乳糜泻是否真正安全或有益,就必须进行更广泛的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信