Failure parameter inversion of the Baige landslides based on seismic signal analysis

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gang Fan, Ziyu Lin, Jiawen Zhou
{"title":"Failure parameter inversion of the Baige landslides based on seismic signal analysis","authors":"Gang Fan,&nbsp;Ziyu Lin,&nbsp;Jiawen Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12250-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Southwest China is prone to landslide disasters due to the complex geographical condition. The failure parameters of two Baige landslides in 2018 were inversed based on seismic signals recorded at adjacent seismograph stations. The global crustal one-dimensional average velocity model provided by Crust 1.0 was adopted to calculate Green’s function. Then, the force‒time functions of the two Baige landslides were inversed. Based on the landslide motion model, the kinetic motion parameters of the two Baige landslides were calculated, and the disaster processes of the two Baige landslides were ultimately revealed in this study. The results showed that the duration of the first Baige landslide was approximately 130 s, including three stages, i.e., the collapse and slide stage of the main sliding mass (last 44 s), the crushing and disintegration stage (last 47 s), and the scattering and accumulation stage (last 39 s). The duration of the second Baige landslide was approximately 130 s, including the collapse and slide stage (last 32 s), the crushing and disintegration stage (last 46 s) and the scattering and accumulation stage (last 58 s). The maximum force is 1.65 × 10<sup>11</sup> N in for the first Baige landslide and 1.69 × 10<sup>11</sup> N for the second Baige landslide, respectively. The maximum velocity of the centroid reached 65.3 m/s at t = 44 s for the first Baige landslide, while the maximum velocity of the centroid reached 64.9 m/s at t = 32 s for the second Baige landslide, which are larger than the existing simulation results. The calculated displacement matches the actual terrain based on the historical satellite images after the two Baige landslides. The trajectory angles of the centroids of the two landslides ranged from 4°~34° and 1°~51°, respectively, and the sliding friction coefficient ranged from 0.03 ~ 0.95 and 0.05 ~ 1.24, respectively. This study provides an indirect method for measuring landslide parameters, and a seismological basis and references for studying the failure mechanism of large-scale landslides.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12250-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Southwest China is prone to landslide disasters due to the complex geographical condition. The failure parameters of two Baige landslides in 2018 were inversed based on seismic signals recorded at adjacent seismograph stations. The global crustal one-dimensional average velocity model provided by Crust 1.0 was adopted to calculate Green’s function. Then, the force‒time functions of the two Baige landslides were inversed. Based on the landslide motion model, the kinetic motion parameters of the two Baige landslides were calculated, and the disaster processes of the two Baige landslides were ultimately revealed in this study. The results showed that the duration of the first Baige landslide was approximately 130 s, including three stages, i.e., the collapse and slide stage of the main sliding mass (last 44 s), the crushing and disintegration stage (last 47 s), and the scattering and accumulation stage (last 39 s). The duration of the second Baige landslide was approximately 130 s, including the collapse and slide stage (last 32 s), the crushing and disintegration stage (last 46 s) and the scattering and accumulation stage (last 58 s). The maximum force is 1.65 × 1011 N in for the first Baige landslide and 1.69 × 1011 N for the second Baige landslide, respectively. The maximum velocity of the centroid reached 65.3 m/s at t = 44 s for the first Baige landslide, while the maximum velocity of the centroid reached 64.9 m/s at t = 32 s for the second Baige landslide, which are larger than the existing simulation results. The calculated displacement matches the actual terrain based on the historical satellite images after the two Baige landslides. The trajectory angles of the centroids of the two landslides ranged from 4°~34° and 1°~51°, respectively, and the sliding friction coefficient ranged from 0.03 ~ 0.95 and 0.05 ~ 1.24, respectively. This study provides an indirect method for measuring landslide parameters, and a seismological basis and references for studying the failure mechanism of large-scale landslides.

基于地震信号分析的白歌滑坡破坏参数反演
中国西南地区地理条件复杂,是滑坡灾害多发地区。利用相邻台站记录的地震信号,反演了2018年白葛市两座滑坡的破坏参数。采用Crust 1.0提供的全球地壳一维平均速度模型计算格林函数。在此基础上,反演了两个白葛山滑坡的力-时函数。在滑坡运动模型的基础上,计算了两个白葛山滑坡的动力学运动参数,最终揭示了两个白葛山滑坡的灾害过程。结果表明:第一次白葛山滑坡持续时间约为130 s,包括主滑体崩塌滑动阶段(后44 s)、破碎崩解阶段(后47 s)和分散堆积阶段(后39 s)三个阶段;第二次白葛山滑坡持续时间约为130 s,包括崩塌滑动阶段(后32 s);破碎崩解阶段(历时46 s)和分散堆积阶段(历时58 s),第一次滑坡最大作用力为1.65 × 1011 N in,第二次滑坡最大作用力为1.69 × 1011 N in。第一次白葛山滑坡在t = 44 s时重心最大速度达到65.3 m/s,第二次白葛山滑坡在t = 32 s时重心最大速度达到64.9 m/s,均大于已有的模拟结果。根据两次白葛山滑坡后的历史卫星影像,计算出的位移与实际地形吻合。两个滑坡的质心轨迹角范围分别为4°~34°和1°~51°,滑动摩擦系数范围分别为0.03 ~ 0.95和0.05 ~ 1.24。该研究为滑坡参数的间接测量提供了一种方法,为研究大型滑坡破坏机制提供了地震基础和参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信