A top-weighted classification method with expert ability characterization for failure mode and effect analysis

IF 7.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sihai Zhao , Siqi Wu , Haiming Liang , Hengjie Zhang
{"title":"A top-weighted classification method with expert ability characterization for failure mode and effect analysis","authors":"Sihai Zhao ,&nbsp;Siqi Wu ,&nbsp;Haiming Liang ,&nbsp;Hengjie Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a useful tool to assess the potential risks of a system and provide necessary correction suggestions. This study proposes a top-weighted classification method with expert ability characterization for FMEA to deal with two crucial issues: few studies have attempted to characterize the ability of FMEA experts to provide accurate assessments in the risk assessment process, and the realistic feature that different risk categories have different importance was not considered. First, we develop a synergy theory-based weight iterative algorithm, by which the ability of experts is characterized and specific weight information is automatically generated at the element level of their assessment matrices. Then, we suggest a novel top-weighted distance measure that considers the importance of different risk categories, based on which the consensus-based top-weighted classification method (CTWCM) is proposed. After that, a simulation comparison experiment is designed to examine the performance of the CTWCM against the ABC analysis and ELECTRE-TRI methods. The numerical results show that the CTWCM outperforms the other two methods on all three key classification indices. In addition, a theoretical comparison is further presented to demonstrate our novelty and significance. Finally, the proposed method is illustrated through a SARS-CoV-2 management case.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50737,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soft Computing","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 113168"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156849462500479X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a useful tool to assess the potential risks of a system and provide necessary correction suggestions. This study proposes a top-weighted classification method with expert ability characterization for FMEA to deal with two crucial issues: few studies have attempted to characterize the ability of FMEA experts to provide accurate assessments in the risk assessment process, and the realistic feature that different risk categories have different importance was not considered. First, we develop a synergy theory-based weight iterative algorithm, by which the ability of experts is characterized and specific weight information is automatically generated at the element level of their assessment matrices. Then, we suggest a novel top-weighted distance measure that considers the importance of different risk categories, based on which the consensus-based top-weighted classification method (CTWCM) is proposed. After that, a simulation comparison experiment is designed to examine the performance of the CTWCM against the ABC analysis and ELECTRE-TRI methods. The numerical results show that the CTWCM outperforms the other two methods on all three key classification indices. In addition, a theoretical comparison is further presented to demonstrate our novelty and significance. Finally, the proposed method is illustrated through a SARS-CoV-2 management case.
基于专家能力表征的故障模式和影响分析的顶加权分类方法
失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)是评估系统潜在风险并提供必要纠正建议的有用工具。本文提出了一种具有专家能力表征的FMEA顶权分类方法,以解决两个关键问题:很少有研究试图表征FMEA专家在风险评估过程中提供准确评估的能力,以及没有考虑不同风险类别具有不同重要性的现实特征。首先,我们开发了一种基于协同理论的权重迭代算法,通过该算法对专家的能力进行表征,并在其评估矩阵的元素层面自动生成特定的权重信息。在此基础上,提出了一种考虑不同风险类别重要性的顶加权距离度量方法,并在此基础上提出了基于共识的顶加权分类方法(CTWCM)。在此之后,设计了一个仿真比较实验来检验CTWCM与ABC分析和ELECTRE-TRI方法的性能。数值结果表明,CTWCM方法在三个关键分类指标上均优于其他两种方法。此外,本文还通过理论比较来说明本文的新颖性和意义。最后,通过一个SARS-CoV-2管理案例对该方法进行了说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soft Computing
Applied Soft Computing 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
874
审稿时长
10.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soft Computing is an international journal promoting an integrated view of soft computing to solve real life problems.The focus is to publish the highest quality research in application and convergence of the areas of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Evolutionary Computing, Rough Sets and other similar techniques to address real world complexities. Applied Soft Computing is a rolling publication: articles are published as soon as the editor-in-chief has accepted them. Therefore, the web site will continuously be updated with new articles and the publication time will be short.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信