Social media for recovery support for people with substance use disorder. A cross-sectional study of use patterns and motivations

Chanda Phelan , Abby P.M. Katz , Jennifer E. Merrill , Kristina M. Jackson , Tyler B. Wray
{"title":"Social media for recovery support for people with substance use disorder. A cross-sectional study of use patterns and motivations","authors":"Chanda Phelan ,&nbsp;Abby P.M. Katz ,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Merrill ,&nbsp;Kristina M. Jackson ,&nbsp;Tyler B. Wray","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2025.100331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examined the use of social media for recovery support among individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) with past-year treatment attendance and tested whether demographic and SUD history factors were associated with use of social media for recovery support.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Participants (N = 255; 45 % female, 85 % white, mean age = 41.4 [9.6]) recently treated for SUD completed an online survey. The survey gathered demographics, SUD histories, and social media use data. We report descriptive statistics and logistic regression models testing relationships between social media for recovery support and individual factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty percent of participants used social media for recovery support, and most believed it beneficial. Being female increased use likelihood (OR = 2.56, 95 % CI [1.49, 4.46]), while older age (50 +) was associated with lower use likelihood than young adults (18−35) (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI [0.14, 0.84]). Social media was used primarily to build support systems and follow recovery-related content. Most found support forums on their own, and engaged with the groups for meaningful amounts of time (<u>&gt;</u>weekly, <u>&gt;</u>15<!--> <!-->minutes).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Results highlight how common it is to use social media for recovery support. Given the sparse evidence on its efficacy, more research is urgently needed to establish whether recovery support forums on social media convey actual benefits, and how to shape one’s digital environment to maximize those benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724625000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study examined the use of social media for recovery support among individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) with past-year treatment attendance and tested whether demographic and SUD history factors were associated with use of social media for recovery support.

Method

Participants (N = 255; 45 % female, 85 % white, mean age = 41.4 [9.6]) recently treated for SUD completed an online survey. The survey gathered demographics, SUD histories, and social media use data. We report descriptive statistics and logistic regression models testing relationships between social media for recovery support and individual factors.

Results

Forty percent of participants used social media for recovery support, and most believed it beneficial. Being female increased use likelihood (OR = 2.56, 95 % CI [1.49, 4.46]), while older age (50 +) was associated with lower use likelihood than young adults (18−35) (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI [0.14, 0.84]). Social media was used primarily to build support systems and follow recovery-related content. Most found support forums on their own, and engaged with the groups for meaningful amounts of time (>weekly, >15 minutes).

Conclusions

Results highlight how common it is to use social media for recovery support. Given the sparse evidence on its efficacy, more research is urgently needed to establish whether recovery support forums on social media convey actual benefits, and how to shape one’s digital environment to maximize those benefits.
为物质使用障碍患者提供康复支持的社交媒体。使用模式和动机的横断面研究
目的本研究考察了过去一年参加药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗的个体使用社交媒体进行康复支持的情况,并检验人口统计学和SUD病史因素是否与使用社交媒体进行康复支持有关。方法参与者(N = 255;45%的女性,85%的白人,平均年龄= 41.4[9.6])最近接受了SUD的在线调查。该调查收集了人口统计、SUD历史和社交媒体使用数据。我们报告了描述性统计和逻辑回归模型,测试了社交媒体对恢复支持和个人因素之间的关系。结果40%的参与者使用社交媒体来获得康复支持,大多数人认为这是有益的。女性增加了使用可能性(OR = 2.56, 95% CI[1.49, 4.46]),而年龄较大(50岁以上)的使用可能性低于年轻人(18 - 35)(OR = 0.35, 95% CI[0.14, 0.84])。社交媒体主要用于建立支持系统和跟踪与恢复相关的内容。大多数人都自己找到了支持论坛,并花了大量的时间(每周15分钟)参与其中。研究结果强调了使用社交媒体进行康复支持是多么普遍。鉴于其有效性的证据很少,迫切需要更多的研究来确定社交媒体上的康复支持论坛是否能带来实际的好处,以及如何塑造一个人的数字环境来最大化这些好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信