Tabea Kloos , Fernando Blanco , Winfried Rief , Ann Meulders , Jenny Riecke
{"title":"Visualizing one's Best Possible Self increases positive future expectancies, but does not boost selective learning in fibromyalgia","authors":"Tabea Kloos , Fernando Blanco , Winfried Rief , Ann Meulders , Jenny Riecke","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Compromised learning is considered to contribute importantly to the development and maintenance of chronic pain disability. More specifically, predictive learning is impaired in people with chronic pain. Therefore, learning mechanisms have been identified as treatment targets. A widely neglected, but relevant question is whether resilience factors can enhance selective learning. This online study combined a selective learning task with a positive psychology intervention in participants with fibromyalgia (FM). The Best Possible Self group (BPS) described and visualized a future in which everything had gone well, which is shown to increase optimism and positive affect, while the active control group described and visualized their Typical Day (TD). Subsequently, selective learning was tested within a contingency learning scenario task using a blocking procedure and pain expectancies as main outcome. We successfully manipulated positive future expectancies (a proxy for state optimism), but not positive affect within a single-session intervention. In contrast with our expectations, the positive psychology intervention did not increase selective learning in the BPS group compared to the TD group, but a small blocking effect was observed in the merged sample. However, because no healthy control group was included, no conclusions can be drawn as to whether the selective learning effect is reduced compared to a non-clinical population. To conclude, there was partial evidence for selective learning in people with fibromyalgia, but manipulated resilience factors did not modulate the selective learning effect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 104748"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725000701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Compromised learning is considered to contribute importantly to the development and maintenance of chronic pain disability. More specifically, predictive learning is impaired in people with chronic pain. Therefore, learning mechanisms have been identified as treatment targets. A widely neglected, but relevant question is whether resilience factors can enhance selective learning. This online study combined a selective learning task with a positive psychology intervention in participants with fibromyalgia (FM). The Best Possible Self group (BPS) described and visualized a future in which everything had gone well, which is shown to increase optimism and positive affect, while the active control group described and visualized their Typical Day (TD). Subsequently, selective learning was tested within a contingency learning scenario task using a blocking procedure and pain expectancies as main outcome. We successfully manipulated positive future expectancies (a proxy for state optimism), but not positive affect within a single-session intervention. In contrast with our expectations, the positive psychology intervention did not increase selective learning in the BPS group compared to the TD group, but a small blocking effect was observed in the merged sample. However, because no healthy control group was included, no conclusions can be drawn as to whether the selective learning effect is reduced compared to a non-clinical population. To conclude, there was partial evidence for selective learning in people with fibromyalgia, but manipulated resilience factors did not modulate the selective learning effect.
期刊介绍:
The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.