Feeling touch through a mirror: The role of vision and body ownership in generating non-veridical tactile experiences

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Emanuele Cirillo , Claudio Zavattaro , Roberto Gammeri , Hilary Serra , Raffaella Ricci , Anna Berti
{"title":"Feeling touch through a mirror: The role of vision and body ownership in generating non-veridical tactile experiences","authors":"Emanuele Cirillo ,&nbsp;Claudio Zavattaro ,&nbsp;Roberto Gammeri ,&nbsp;Hilary Serra ,&nbsp;Raffaella Ricci ,&nbsp;Anna Berti","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tactile experience can be non-veridical, i.e., not related to the actual stimulation of one's body. Recently, using a mirror box procedure in healthy subjects, we found that during bilateral asymmetrical touches, the vision of the right-hand being stimulated, reflected in the mirror, elicited on the real left-hand the feeling of being touched in the same position as the right-hand. Because these errors resemble synchiria, we called these false feelings ‘synchiric errors' (SEs). Here, we investigated both the role of top-down feeling of body ownership (BO) over the mirrored hand—using explicit (BO questionnaires) and implicit (Electrodermal Activity) measures of BO- and bottom-up visual processing—by manipulating the presence/absence of visual feedback—in generating SEs during the Tactile Quadrant Stimulation Test (TQS). In TQS, subjects had to indicate the position of a tactile stimulus, applied in asymmetrical quadrants on the dorsum of the two hands, under three conditions: Baseline (no vision), Mirror Condition Vision (MCV; full visual feedback), and Mirror Condition Blind (MCB; visual feedback occluded). We tested 35 healthy individuals. First, measures of BO indicated that most subjects felt the right reflected hand as their own left hand. Moreover, we found a significant presence of SEs in the MCV. Crucially, SEs were significantly higher for the left hand in MCV compared to Baseline and MCB, confirming the critical role of vision in inducing the non-veridical tactile experience. Moreover, the absence of a correlation between SEs and body ownership measures, and a double dissociation between them, indicate that SEs are driven by vision and not by an alteration of BO.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"187 ","pages":"Pages 16-28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945225000966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tactile experience can be non-veridical, i.e., not related to the actual stimulation of one's body. Recently, using a mirror box procedure in healthy subjects, we found that during bilateral asymmetrical touches, the vision of the right-hand being stimulated, reflected in the mirror, elicited on the real left-hand the feeling of being touched in the same position as the right-hand. Because these errors resemble synchiria, we called these false feelings ‘synchiric errors' (SEs). Here, we investigated both the role of top-down feeling of body ownership (BO) over the mirrored hand—using explicit (BO questionnaires) and implicit (Electrodermal Activity) measures of BO- and bottom-up visual processing—by manipulating the presence/absence of visual feedback—in generating SEs during the Tactile Quadrant Stimulation Test (TQS). In TQS, subjects had to indicate the position of a tactile stimulus, applied in asymmetrical quadrants on the dorsum of the two hands, under three conditions: Baseline (no vision), Mirror Condition Vision (MCV; full visual feedback), and Mirror Condition Blind (MCB; visual feedback occluded). We tested 35 healthy individuals. First, measures of BO indicated that most subjects felt the right reflected hand as their own left hand. Moreover, we found a significant presence of SEs in the MCV. Crucially, SEs were significantly higher for the left hand in MCV compared to Baseline and MCB, confirming the critical role of vision in inducing the non-veridical tactile experience. Moreover, the absence of a correlation between SEs and body ownership measures, and a double dissociation between them, indicate that SEs are driven by vision and not by an alteration of BO.
通过镜子感受触摸:视觉和身体所有权在产生非真实触觉体验中的作用
触觉体验可以是非真实的,即与身体的实际刺激无关。最近,我们在健康受试者中使用镜盒程序,我们发现在双侧不对称触摸时,被刺激的右手的视觉,反射在镜子中,在真正的左手上引起了被触摸到与右手相同位置的感觉。因为这些错误类似于同步性,我们把这些错误的感觉称为“同步性错误”(SEs)。在这里,我们研究了自上而下的身体所有权感(BO)对镜像手的作用——使用显性(BO问卷)和隐性(皮肤电活动)测量BO和自下而上的视觉处理——通过操纵视觉反馈的存在/缺失——在触觉象限刺激测试(TQS)中产生se。在TQS中,受试者必须在三种情况下指出触觉刺激的位置,触觉刺激被施加在双手背部的不对称象限上:基线(无视觉)、镜像条件视觉(MCV);完全视觉反馈)和镜像条件盲(MCB;视觉反馈被遮挡)。我们测试了35个健康人。首先,BO的测量表明,大多数被试感觉右手被反射的手是他们自己的左手。此外,我们在MCV中发现了显著的se存在。最重要的是,与基线和MCB相比,MCV中左手的se显著更高,证实了视觉在诱导非真实触觉体验中的关键作用。此外,SEs与身体所有权测量之间缺乏相关性,两者之间存在双重分离,表明SEs是由视觉驱动的,而不是由BO的改变驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信