Recycled concrete paving block waste as a selected sustainable substitute for natural aggregate in cement composites

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Jan Pizoń , Kateřina Matýsková , Marie Horňáková , Małgorzata Gołaszewska , Gabriela Kratošová
{"title":"Recycled concrete paving block waste as a selected sustainable substitute for natural aggregate in cement composites","authors":"Jan Pizoń ,&nbsp;Kateřina Matýsková ,&nbsp;Marie Horňáková ,&nbsp;Małgorzata Gołaszewska ,&nbsp;Gabriela Kratošová","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the impact of replacing natural aggregates with second-quality sorted concrete paving block (CPB) aggregates in mortars and concretes. Substitution levels varied from 0 % to 100 % for fine aggregates in mortars and 50 % for fine and/or coarse aggregates in concretes. The research analysed the properties of the waste material, including particle size distribution, porosity, water absorption, and density. For mortars and concretes, the evaluated parameters encompassed workability, consistency, density, compressive strength, electrical resistivity, and microstructure. The findings indicate that mortars incorporating CPB aggregates necessitate higher dosages of superplasticizers to achieve desired workability. This requirement is attributed to the increased cement content per unit volume and the finer particle size of the recycled aggregates. Early compressive strength of mortars peaks at a 50 % recycled aggregate content due to a reduced effective water-to-cement ratio, while 100 % substitution of fine aggregate leads to a significant decrease in compressive strength. Concretes with recycled aggregates exhibit comparable or superior early compressive strength relative to reference concrete, but after 28 days, all concretes with recycled aggregates display lower strength. The 28-day compressive strengths are 65.9 MPa, 64.8 MPa, and 62.3 MPa for 50 % replacement by fine, coarse, and a combination of both aggregates, respectively. These results surpass those achieved in similar studies. Durability assessments suggest that concrete mixtures with CPB exhibit trends comparable to reference concrete, indicating moderate resistance to chloride penetration. Overall, the findings suggest that utilizing sorted CPB aggregates is a viable approach to replacing natural aggregates in mortars and concretes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"478 ","pages":"Article 141356"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825015041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of replacing natural aggregates with second-quality sorted concrete paving block (CPB) aggregates in mortars and concretes. Substitution levels varied from 0 % to 100 % for fine aggregates in mortars and 50 % for fine and/or coarse aggregates in concretes. The research analysed the properties of the waste material, including particle size distribution, porosity, water absorption, and density. For mortars and concretes, the evaluated parameters encompassed workability, consistency, density, compressive strength, electrical resistivity, and microstructure. The findings indicate that mortars incorporating CPB aggregates necessitate higher dosages of superplasticizers to achieve desired workability. This requirement is attributed to the increased cement content per unit volume and the finer particle size of the recycled aggregates. Early compressive strength of mortars peaks at a 50 % recycled aggregate content due to a reduced effective water-to-cement ratio, while 100 % substitution of fine aggregate leads to a significant decrease in compressive strength. Concretes with recycled aggregates exhibit comparable or superior early compressive strength relative to reference concrete, but after 28 days, all concretes with recycled aggregates display lower strength. The 28-day compressive strengths are 65.9 MPa, 64.8 MPa, and 62.3 MPa for 50 % replacement by fine, coarse, and a combination of both aggregates, respectively. These results surpass those achieved in similar studies. Durability assessments suggest that concrete mixtures with CPB exhibit trends comparable to reference concrete, indicating moderate resistance to chloride penetration. Overall, the findings suggest that utilizing sorted CPB aggregates is a viable approach to replacing natural aggregates in mortars and concretes.
再生混凝土铺路块废料作为水泥复合材料中天然骨料的可持续替代品
本研究考察了在砂浆和混凝土中使用二级分类混凝土铺装块(CPB)骨料取代天然骨料的影响。砂浆中细骨料的替代水平从0 %到100 %不等,混凝土中细骨料和/或粗骨料的替代水平为50 %。该研究分析了废料的性质,包括粒度分布、孔隙率、吸水率和密度。对于砂浆和混凝土,评估参数包括和易性、稠度、密度、抗压强度、电阻率和微观结构。研究结果表明,含有CPB骨料的砂浆需要更高剂量的高效减水剂才能达到理想的和易性。这一要求归因于单位体积水泥含量的增加和再生骨料的更细粒度。当再生骨料掺量为50% %时,有效水灰比降低,砂浆早期抗压强度达到峰值,而当细骨料掺量为100% %时,砂浆抗压强度显著降低。与参考混凝土相比,含有再生骨料的混凝土表现出相当或更高的早期抗压强度,但在28天后,所有含有再生骨料的混凝土的强度都降低了。以细、粗、混合两种骨料替代50% %时,28天抗压强度分别为65.9 MPa、64.8 MPa和62.3 MPa。这些结果超过了同类研究的结果。耐久性评估表明,含有CPB的混凝土混合物表现出与参考混凝土相当的趋势,表明对氯化物渗透具有中等抵抗力。总体而言,研究结果表明,利用分类CPB骨料是替代砂浆和混凝土中的天然骨料的可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信