Yi Zhou , Haile Zhao , Yuchao Luo , Xincheng Yi , Fei Lun
{"title":"Exploring the inequality in urban parks’ distribution and their cooling effects from the perspective of urbanization","authors":"Yi Zhou , Haile Zhao , Yuchao Luo , Xincheng Yi , Fei Lun","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban parks play a crucial role in mitigating urban overheating, but their unequal distribution exacerbates heat inequality. Park cooling effects extend beyond park boundaries, benefiting surrounding residential communities. However, it remains uncertain whether the spatial spillover of park cooling effects can compensate for the unequal distribution of urban parks. This study estimated the park cooling effects in 276 Chinese cities and analyzed the inequality in access to urban parks and their cooling effects across Chinese residential communities from the perspective of urbanization. The results show that: (1) Chinese urban parks provide substantial cooling effects. The average park cooling intensity (PCI) in selected cities is 1.36 °C, with a cooling distance (PCD) of 165 m and a cooling area (PCA) of 879,879 × 10<sup>4</sup> m<sup>2</sup>, accounting for 52 % of residential community areas. However, 25 % of the cooling areas overlap, and only 12 % of residential communities are covered by cooling areas directly. (2) Observed inequality in Chinese urban parks’ distribution and their cooling effects. Wealthier communities have access to smaller parks with more water bodies, less impervious surfaces, and higher PCI. Inequality exists in both park and cooling areas. However, the significantly lower Gini index of cooling areas compared to park areas suggests that enhancing park cooling effects can help mitigate the inequality in urban parks’ distribution. (3) Inequities in parks’ distribution and cooling effects vary across cities with different levels of urbanization. Chinese cities can be clustered into two types based on the inequality in urban parks and their cooling effects, highlighting the unique challenges faced by cities at different development levels. Cities with lower urbanization rate and GDP lack sufficient per capita park and cooling areas, while more urbanized and economically developed cities face more severe inequity challenges related to inequitable distribution of urban parks and their cooling effects. We recommend increasing park supply, optimizing park spatial distribution, and enhancing cooling effects to address insufficient park resources and their unequal distribution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 105390"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625000970","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urban parks play a crucial role in mitigating urban overheating, but their unequal distribution exacerbates heat inequality. Park cooling effects extend beyond park boundaries, benefiting surrounding residential communities. However, it remains uncertain whether the spatial spillover of park cooling effects can compensate for the unequal distribution of urban parks. This study estimated the park cooling effects in 276 Chinese cities and analyzed the inequality in access to urban parks and their cooling effects across Chinese residential communities from the perspective of urbanization. The results show that: (1) Chinese urban parks provide substantial cooling effects. The average park cooling intensity (PCI) in selected cities is 1.36 °C, with a cooling distance (PCD) of 165 m and a cooling area (PCA) of 879,879 × 104 m2, accounting for 52 % of residential community areas. However, 25 % of the cooling areas overlap, and only 12 % of residential communities are covered by cooling areas directly. (2) Observed inequality in Chinese urban parks’ distribution and their cooling effects. Wealthier communities have access to smaller parks with more water bodies, less impervious surfaces, and higher PCI. Inequality exists in both park and cooling areas. However, the significantly lower Gini index of cooling areas compared to park areas suggests that enhancing park cooling effects can help mitigate the inequality in urban parks’ distribution. (3) Inequities in parks’ distribution and cooling effects vary across cities with different levels of urbanization. Chinese cities can be clustered into two types based on the inequality in urban parks and their cooling effects, highlighting the unique challenges faced by cities at different development levels. Cities with lower urbanization rate and GDP lack sufficient per capita park and cooling areas, while more urbanized and economically developed cities face more severe inequity challenges related to inequitable distribution of urban parks and their cooling effects. We recommend increasing park supply, optimizing park spatial distribution, and enhancing cooling effects to address insufficient park resources and their unequal distribution.
期刊介绍:
Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.