Quantifying thresholds of key drivers for ecosystem health in large-scale river basins: A case study of the upper and middle Yellow River

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xue Li , Kunxia Yu , Guoce Xu , Peng Li , Zhanbin Li , Peng Shi , Lu Jia , Zhi Yang , Zihui Yue
{"title":"Quantifying thresholds of key drivers for ecosystem health in large-scale river basins: A case study of the upper and middle Yellow River","authors":"Xue Li ,&nbsp;Kunxia Yu ,&nbsp;Guoce Xu ,&nbsp;Peng Li ,&nbsp;Zhanbin Li ,&nbsp;Peng Shi ,&nbsp;Lu Jia ,&nbsp;Zhi Yang ,&nbsp;Zihui Yue","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Under the dual pressures of global climate change and anthropogenic activities, identifying key thresholds for ecosystem health is essential for biodiversity conservation, climate change mitigation, and regional sustainable development. Utilizing the vitality-organization-resilience-service model, this study quantifies the spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem health in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2020. Extreme precipitation indices, integrated with partial least squares structural equation modeling, were employed to elucidate the mechanisms by which extreme rainfall impacts ecosystem health. The results indicate that:(1) Both ecosystem vitality and ecosystem organization increased, reflecting enhanced ecosystem stability and connectivity, with significant vegetation recovery in forest and grassland regions. (2) Ecosystem health significantly improved in 69.48 % of the regions. The improvement of ecosystem health in the midstream is primarily attributed to the extensive restoration of forest and grassland. Ecological restoration did not substantially change the ecological vulnerability of the northern desert areas, and restoration should be prioritized in the future. (3) As a primary driver of ecosystem health, moderate increases in vegetation coverage can enhance ecosystem health; the threshold values for nighttime light intensity, relative humidity, precipitation, and land use intensity are 0.6, 68.61 %, 789.92 mm, and 2.34, respectively. (4) Extreme precipitation indirectly affects ecosystem health by influencing vegetation, with a combined contribution rate of 26.10 %. The long-term impact of single extreme precipitation events is limited, and cumulative precipitation events have a greater effect on ecosystem stability. This study determines the threshold of environmental and anthropogenic factors on ecosystem health and clarifies the indirect impact of extreme precipitation on ecosystem health through vegetation, thereby providing a scientific basis for the sustainable management of large-scale vulnerable river systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 125480"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725014562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under the dual pressures of global climate change and anthropogenic activities, identifying key thresholds for ecosystem health is essential for biodiversity conservation, climate change mitigation, and regional sustainable development. Utilizing the vitality-organization-resilience-service model, this study quantifies the spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem health in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River from 2000 to 2020. Extreme precipitation indices, integrated with partial least squares structural equation modeling, were employed to elucidate the mechanisms by which extreme rainfall impacts ecosystem health. The results indicate that:(1) Both ecosystem vitality and ecosystem organization increased, reflecting enhanced ecosystem stability and connectivity, with significant vegetation recovery in forest and grassland regions. (2) Ecosystem health significantly improved in 69.48 % of the regions. The improvement of ecosystem health in the midstream is primarily attributed to the extensive restoration of forest and grassland. Ecological restoration did not substantially change the ecological vulnerability of the northern desert areas, and restoration should be prioritized in the future. (3) As a primary driver of ecosystem health, moderate increases in vegetation coverage can enhance ecosystem health; the threshold values for nighttime light intensity, relative humidity, precipitation, and land use intensity are 0.6, 68.61 %, 789.92 mm, and 2.34, respectively. (4) Extreme precipitation indirectly affects ecosystem health by influencing vegetation, with a combined contribution rate of 26.10 %. The long-term impact of single extreme precipitation events is limited, and cumulative precipitation events have a greater effect on ecosystem stability. This study determines the threshold of environmental and anthropogenic factors on ecosystem health and clarifies the indirect impact of extreme precipitation on ecosystem health through vegetation, thereby providing a scientific basis for the sustainable management of large-scale vulnerable river systems.
大尺度流域生态系统健康关键驱动因素阈值量化研究——以黄河中上游为例
在全球气候变化和人类活动的双重压力下,确定生态系统健康的关键阈值对于生物多样性保护、减缓气候变化和区域可持续发展至关重要。利用“活力-组织-弹性-服务”模型,定量分析了2000 - 2020年黄河中上游生态系统健康的时空演变特征。利用极端降水指数,结合偏最小二乘结构方程模型,分析了极端降水对生态系统健康的影响机制。结果表明:①生态系统活力和生态系统组织均有所增加,反映出生态系统稳定性和连通性增强,森林和草地植被恢复明显;(2) 69.48%的区域生态系统健康显著改善。中游生态系统健康状况的改善主要得益于森林和草地的广泛恢复。生态恢复并未实质性改变北部荒漠地区的生态脆弱性,未来应优先进行生态恢复。(3)植被覆盖度的适度增加是生态系统健康的主要驱动因素;夜间光照强度、相对湿度、降水量和土地利用强度的阈值分别为0.6、68.61%、789.92 mm和2.34 mm。(4)极端降水通过影响植被间接影响生态系统健康,综合贡献率为26.10%。单次极端降水事件的长期影响有限,累积降水事件对生态系统稳定性的影响更大。本研究确定了环境和人为因素对生态系统健康的阈值,阐明了极端降水通过植被对生态系统健康的间接影响,为大规模脆弱水系的可持续管理提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信