Avifaunal communities as indicators of silvicultural impacts in mangrove forests

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Giovanna Wolswijk , Tom Bernard , Jani Sleutel , Lea Fourchault , Jean Hugé , Behara Satyanarayana , Farid Dahdouh-Guebas
{"title":"Avifaunal communities as indicators of silvicultural impacts in mangrove forests","authors":"Giovanna Wolswijk ,&nbsp;Tom Bernard ,&nbsp;Jani Sleutel ,&nbsp;Lea Fourchault ,&nbsp;Jean Hugé ,&nbsp;Behara Satyanarayana ,&nbsp;Farid Dahdouh-Guebas","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although the Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve (MMFR) in Malaysia is suggested to be a global reference for sustainable silviculture, the impact of greenwood extraction on local biodiversity and ecological functionality remains under-researched. To fill this gap, a rapid biodiversity assessment was conducted using birds as ecological indicators to investigate the effect of mangrove silvicultural management on avian communities. Changes in the diversity of bird species and dietary guilds in response to forest age and management were assessed using the point-count method with visual and auditory observations. This was done in both “productive” forests, consisting of even-aged <em>Rhizophora</em> plantations producing poles and charcoal, and in “protective” forests where extractive activities are prohibited. Remarkably, all avifaunal functional guilds were present in both young “productive” and “protective” forests, however the “productive” forests supported fewer bird assemblages in terms of species richness and total taxonomic diversity compared to the floristically rich and structurally complex “protective” forests. The bird species’ response to silvicultural disturbances also varied, with adverse effects especially occurring in functionally specialized species. Furthermore, back mangroves and transition zones to terrestrial forests were found to support a higher avifaunal diversity, possibly because of the enhanced habitat heterogeneity. Finally, this study highlights the use of bird communities as ecological indicators for assessing the quality of mangrove forests, and emphasises the crucial role of habitat and landscape heterogeneity in supporting diverse avifauna and ecosystem functionality highlighting the need for more research integrating mangroves and adjacent ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 125414"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013908","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve (MMFR) in Malaysia is suggested to be a global reference for sustainable silviculture, the impact of greenwood extraction on local biodiversity and ecological functionality remains under-researched. To fill this gap, a rapid biodiversity assessment was conducted using birds as ecological indicators to investigate the effect of mangrove silvicultural management on avian communities. Changes in the diversity of bird species and dietary guilds in response to forest age and management were assessed using the point-count method with visual and auditory observations. This was done in both “productive” forests, consisting of even-aged Rhizophora plantations producing poles and charcoal, and in “protective” forests where extractive activities are prohibited. Remarkably, all avifaunal functional guilds were present in both young “productive” and “protective” forests, however the “productive” forests supported fewer bird assemblages in terms of species richness and total taxonomic diversity compared to the floristically rich and structurally complex “protective” forests. The bird species’ response to silvicultural disturbances also varied, with adverse effects especially occurring in functionally specialized species. Furthermore, back mangroves and transition zones to terrestrial forests were found to support a higher avifaunal diversity, possibly because of the enhanced habitat heterogeneity. Finally, this study highlights the use of bird communities as ecological indicators for assessing the quality of mangrove forests, and emphasises the crucial role of habitat and landscape heterogeneity in supporting diverse avifauna and ecosystem functionality highlighting the need for more research integrating mangroves and adjacent ecosystems.

Abstract Image

鸟类群落作为红树林造林影响的指标
虽然马来西亚的马唐红树林保护区(MMFR)被认为是全球可持续森林栽培的参考,但绿木开采对当地生物多样性和生态功能的影响仍未得到充分研究。为了填补这一空白,本研究采用以鸟类为生态指标的快速生物多样性评估方法,探讨红树林造林管理对鸟类群落的影响。采用点计数法结合视觉和听觉观察,评估了鸟类种类和食性多样性随森林年龄和管理的变化。这是在“生产性”森林中进行的,包括年龄均匀的生产杆子和木炭的根hora人工林,以及在禁止采伐活动的“保护性”森林中进行的。值得注意的是,所有的鸟类功能行会都存在于年轻的“生产性”林和“保护性”林中,但“生产性”林在物种丰富度和总分类多样性方面支持的鸟类组合少于区系丰富和结构复杂的“保护性”林。鸟类对造林干扰的反应也各不相同,不利影响尤其发生在功能特殊的物种中。此外,红树林和向陆生森林的过渡区支持更高的鸟类多样性,可能是因为栖息地异质性增强。最后,本研究强调了使用鸟类群落作为评估红树林质量的生态指标,并强调了栖息地和景观异质性在支持多样化鸟类和生态系统功能方面的关键作用,强调了对红树林和邻近生态系统进行更多整合研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信