Omid Deymi , Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam , Saeid Atashrouz , Saptarshi Kar , Ali Abedi , Ahmad Mohaddespour , Mehdi Ostadhassan , Abdolhossein Hemmati-Sarapardeh
{"title":"Innovative mathematical correlations for estimating mono-nanofluids' density: Insights from white-box machine learning","authors":"Omid Deymi , Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam , Saeid Atashrouz , Saptarshi Kar , Ali Abedi , Ahmad Mohaddespour , Mehdi Ostadhassan , Abdolhossein Hemmati-Sarapardeh","doi":"10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current research offers credible mathematical models solely for estimating mono-nanofluids' density (<em>ρ<sub>nf</sub></em>), which can be useful for thermal engineering calculations required by various industries and applications. Accordingly, a comprehensive data bank encompassing 4004 experimental data-points was utilized to execute two rigorous machine-learning techniques: Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Gene Expression Programming (GEP). Subsequently, two high-accuracy correlations were fine-tuned based on the four independent variables: average nanoparticle diameter (<em>d<sub>np</sub></em>), nanoparticle mass concentration (<em>ϕ<sub>m</sub></em>), nanoparticle density (<em>ρ<sub>np</sub></em>), and base-fluid density (<em>ρ<sub>bf</sub></em>). Two variables pressure (<em>P</em>) and temperature (<em>T</em>), with rather minor impacts on the density of the mono-nanofluids under investigation, were excluded in the final correlations as a result of the modeling process and the intelligent operation of the machine-learning techniques. By performing multiple statistical and graphical analyses, comparative evaluations highlighted the superior performance and outstanding accuracy of the GEP-based correlation (with AAPRE=0.6614% and R<sup>2</sup>=0.9671). Moreover, sensitivity analysis and parametric trend assessments revealed that <em>ϕ<sub>m</sub></em> and <em>ρ<sub>bf</sub></em> were the most crucial variables affecting <em>ρ<sub>nf</sub></em> values, with relevancy factors of approximately 0.72 and 0.71, respectively. By considering the GEP-based correlation's outputs and applying the leverage statistical approach, a considerable portion (96.33%) of the total data-points was identified as valid data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21042,"journal":{"name":"Results in Physics","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 108248"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379725001421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current research offers credible mathematical models solely for estimating mono-nanofluids' density (ρnf), which can be useful for thermal engineering calculations required by various industries and applications. Accordingly, a comprehensive data bank encompassing 4004 experimental data-points was utilized to execute two rigorous machine-learning techniques: Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Gene Expression Programming (GEP). Subsequently, two high-accuracy correlations were fine-tuned based on the four independent variables: average nanoparticle diameter (dnp), nanoparticle mass concentration (ϕm), nanoparticle density (ρnp), and base-fluid density (ρbf). Two variables pressure (P) and temperature (T), with rather minor impacts on the density of the mono-nanofluids under investigation, were excluded in the final correlations as a result of the modeling process and the intelligent operation of the machine-learning techniques. By performing multiple statistical and graphical analyses, comparative evaluations highlighted the superior performance and outstanding accuracy of the GEP-based correlation (with AAPRE=0.6614% and R2=0.9671). Moreover, sensitivity analysis and parametric trend assessments revealed that ϕm and ρbf were the most crucial variables affecting ρnf values, with relevancy factors of approximately 0.72 and 0.71, respectively. By considering the GEP-based correlation's outputs and applying the leverage statistical approach, a considerable portion (96.33%) of the total data-points was identified as valid data.
Results in PhysicsMATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARYPHYSIC-PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
754
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍:
Results in Physics is an open access journal offering authors the opportunity to publish in all fundamental and interdisciplinary areas of physics, materials science, and applied physics. Papers of a theoretical, computational, and experimental nature are all welcome. Results in Physics accepts papers that are scientifically sound, technically correct and provide valuable new knowledge to the physics community. Topics such as three-dimensional flow and magnetohydrodynamics are not within the scope of Results in Physics.
Results in Physics welcomes three types of papers:
1. Full research papers
2. Microarticles: very short papers, no longer than two pages. They may consist of a single, but well-described piece of information, such as:
- Data and/or a plot plus a description
- Description of a new method or instrumentation
- Negative results
- Concept or design study
3. Letters to the Editor: Letters discussing a recent article published in Results in Physics are welcome. These are objective, constructive, or educational critiques of papers published in Results in Physics. Accepted letters will be sent to the author of the original paper for a response. Each letter and response is published together. Letters should be received within 8 weeks of the article''s publication. They should not exceed 750 words of text and 10 references.