Innovative mathematical correlations for estimating mono-nanofluids' density: Insights from white-box machine learning

IF 4.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Omid Deymi , Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam , Saeid Atashrouz , Saptarshi Kar , Ali Abedi , Ahmad Mohaddespour , Mehdi Ostadhassan , Abdolhossein Hemmati-Sarapardeh
{"title":"Innovative mathematical correlations for estimating mono-nanofluids' density: Insights from white-box machine learning","authors":"Omid Deymi ,&nbsp;Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam ,&nbsp;Saeid Atashrouz ,&nbsp;Saptarshi Kar ,&nbsp;Ali Abedi ,&nbsp;Ahmad Mohaddespour ,&nbsp;Mehdi Ostadhassan ,&nbsp;Abdolhossein Hemmati-Sarapardeh","doi":"10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current research offers credible mathematical models solely for estimating mono-nanofluids' density (<em>ρ<sub>nf</sub></em>), which can be useful for thermal engineering calculations required by various industries and applications. Accordingly, a comprehensive data bank encompassing 4004 experimental data-points was utilized to execute two rigorous machine-learning techniques: Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Gene Expression Programming (GEP). Subsequently, two high-accuracy correlations were fine-tuned based on the four independent variables: average nanoparticle diameter (<em>d<sub>np</sub></em>), nanoparticle mass concentration (<em>ϕ<sub>m</sub></em>), nanoparticle density (<em>ρ<sub>np</sub></em>), and base-fluid density (<em>ρ<sub>bf</sub></em>). Two variables pressure (<em>P</em>) and temperature (<em>T</em>), with rather minor impacts on the density of the mono-nanofluids under investigation, were excluded in the final correlations as a result of the modeling process and the intelligent operation of the machine-learning techniques. By performing multiple statistical and graphical analyses, comparative evaluations highlighted the superior performance and outstanding accuracy of the GEP-based correlation (with AAPRE=0.6614% and R<sup>2</sup>=0.9671). Moreover, sensitivity analysis and parametric trend assessments revealed that <em>ϕ<sub>m</sub></em> and <em>ρ<sub>bf</sub></em> were the most crucial variables affecting <em>ρ<sub>nf</sub></em> values, with relevancy factors of approximately 0.72 and 0.71, respectively. By considering the GEP-based correlation's outputs and applying the leverage statistical approach, a considerable portion (96.33%) of the total data-points was identified as valid data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21042,"journal":{"name":"Results in Physics","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 108248"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379725001421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current research offers credible mathematical models solely for estimating mono-nanofluids' density (ρnf), which can be useful for thermal engineering calculations required by various industries and applications. Accordingly, a comprehensive data bank encompassing 4004 experimental data-points was utilized to execute two rigorous machine-learning techniques: Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Gene Expression Programming (GEP). Subsequently, two high-accuracy correlations were fine-tuned based on the four independent variables: average nanoparticle diameter (dnp), nanoparticle mass concentration (ϕm), nanoparticle density (ρnp), and base-fluid density (ρbf). Two variables pressure (P) and temperature (T), with rather minor impacts on the density of the mono-nanofluids under investigation, were excluded in the final correlations as a result of the modeling process and the intelligent operation of the machine-learning techniques. By performing multiple statistical and graphical analyses, comparative evaluations highlighted the superior performance and outstanding accuracy of the GEP-based correlation (with AAPRE=0.6614% and R2=0.9671). Moreover, sensitivity analysis and parametric trend assessments revealed that ϕm and ρbf were the most crucial variables affecting ρnf values, with relevancy factors of approximately 0.72 and 0.71, respectively. By considering the GEP-based correlation's outputs and applying the leverage statistical approach, a considerable portion (96.33%) of the total data-points was identified as valid data.

Abstract Image

估计单纳米流体密度的创新数学相关性:来自白盒机器学习的见解
目前的研究为估计单纳米流体的密度(ρnf)提供了可靠的数学模型,可用于各种工业和应用所需的热工计算。因此,利用包含4004个实验数据点的综合数据库来执行两种严格的机器学习技术:数据处理组方法(GMDH)和基因表达编程(GEP)。随后,基于四个自变量:平均纳米颗粒直径(dnp)、纳米颗粒质量浓度(ϕm)、纳米颗粒密度(ρnp)和基液密度(ρbf),对两个高精度相关性进行微调。由于建模过程和机器学习技术的智能操作,对所研究的单纳米流体密度影响较小的两个变量压力(P)和温度(T)被排除在最终的相关性中。通过多项统计和图形分析,对比评价显示基于gep的相关性具有较好的性能和较好的准确性(AAPRE=0.6614%, R2=0.9671)。灵敏度分析和参数化趋势评估结果表明,影响ρnf值的最关键变量为ϕm和ρbf,相关因子分别约为0.72和0.71。通过考虑基于gep的相关输出,并应用杠杆统计方法,确定了相当一部分(96.33%)的数据点为有效数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Physics
Results in Physics MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARYPHYSIC-PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
754
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Results in Physics is an open access journal offering authors the opportunity to publish in all fundamental and interdisciplinary areas of physics, materials science, and applied physics. Papers of a theoretical, computational, and experimental nature are all welcome. Results in Physics accepts papers that are scientifically sound, technically correct and provide valuable new knowledge to the physics community. Topics such as three-dimensional flow and magnetohydrodynamics are not within the scope of Results in Physics. Results in Physics welcomes three types of papers: 1. Full research papers 2. Microarticles: very short papers, no longer than two pages. They may consist of a single, but well-described piece of information, such as: - Data and/or a plot plus a description - Description of a new method or instrumentation - Negative results - Concept or design study 3. Letters to the Editor: Letters discussing a recent article published in Results in Physics are welcome. These are objective, constructive, or educational critiques of papers published in Results in Physics. Accepted letters will be sent to the author of the original paper for a response. Each letter and response is published together. Letters should be received within 8 weeks of the article''s publication. They should not exceed 750 words of text and 10 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信