{"title":"Income inequality and social welfare: Implications for the indirect effects of transport policies","authors":"Paul R. Koster","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.03.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban and transport policies cause indirect effects such as increases in average income levels. When income inequality changes with average income levels there can be additional indirect inequality costs or benefits. This paper develops tractable marginal social welfare measures that incorporate average income levels and income inequality effects for cases where households compare their income shares or levels to the mean or to all other households. Using neighbourhood data for the years 2006–2019 for the city of Amsterdam, fixed effects regression with temporal and spatial control variables result in an estimated income elasticity of the Gini is of about 0.4, suggesting that income growth is higher for higher income levels. Estimates of marginal social welfare changes vary greatly with model choice and social preferences for income equality. This paper finds that for a one euro increase in average income about 0–98 % of the income benefits can be lost due to increases in income inequality where results strongly depend on model choice. Indirect income benefits of transport policies therefore can be correctly estimated or negligible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"168 ","pages":"Pages 182-197"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25001271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urban and transport policies cause indirect effects such as increases in average income levels. When income inequality changes with average income levels there can be additional indirect inequality costs or benefits. This paper develops tractable marginal social welfare measures that incorporate average income levels and income inequality effects for cases where households compare their income shares or levels to the mean or to all other households. Using neighbourhood data for the years 2006–2019 for the city of Amsterdam, fixed effects regression with temporal and spatial control variables result in an estimated income elasticity of the Gini is of about 0.4, suggesting that income growth is higher for higher income levels. Estimates of marginal social welfare changes vary greatly with model choice and social preferences for income equality. This paper finds that for a one euro increase in average income about 0–98 % of the income benefits can be lost due to increases in income inequality where results strongly depend on model choice. Indirect income benefits of transport policies therefore can be correctly estimated or negligible.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.