Income inequality and social welfare: Implications for the indirect effects of transport policies

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Paul R. Koster
{"title":"Income inequality and social welfare: Implications for the indirect effects of transport policies","authors":"Paul R. Koster","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.03.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban and transport policies cause indirect effects such as increases in average income levels. When income inequality changes with average income levels there can be additional indirect inequality costs or benefits. This paper develops tractable marginal social welfare measures that incorporate average income levels and income inequality effects for cases where households compare their income shares or levels to the mean or to all other households. Using neighbourhood data for the years 2006–2019 for the city of Amsterdam, fixed effects regression with temporal and spatial control variables result in an estimated income elasticity of the Gini is of about 0.4, suggesting that income growth is higher for higher income levels. Estimates of marginal social welfare changes vary greatly with model choice and social preferences for income equality. This paper finds that for a one euro increase in average income about 0–98 % of the income benefits can be lost due to increases in income inequality where results strongly depend on model choice. Indirect income benefits of transport policies therefore can be correctly estimated or negligible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"168 ","pages":"Pages 182-197"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25001271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban and transport policies cause indirect effects such as increases in average income levels. When income inequality changes with average income levels there can be additional indirect inequality costs or benefits. This paper develops tractable marginal social welfare measures that incorporate average income levels and income inequality effects for cases where households compare their income shares or levels to the mean or to all other households. Using neighbourhood data for the years 2006–2019 for the city of Amsterdam, fixed effects regression with temporal and spatial control variables result in an estimated income elasticity of the Gini is of about 0.4, suggesting that income growth is higher for higher income levels. Estimates of marginal social welfare changes vary greatly with model choice and social preferences for income equality. This paper finds that for a one euro increase in average income about 0–98 % of the income benefits can be lost due to increases in income inequality where results strongly depend on model choice. Indirect income benefits of transport policies therefore can be correctly estimated or negligible.
收入不平等与社会福利:交通政策的间接影响
城市和交通政策会产生间接影响,例如平均收入水平的提高。当收入不平等随着平均收入水平而变化时,可能会产生额外的间接不平等成本或收益。本文开发了可处理的边际社会福利措施,将平均收入水平和收入不平等效应纳入家庭将其收入份额或水平与平均值或所有其他家庭进行比较的情况下。利用阿姆斯特丹市2006-2019年的社区数据,结合时间和空间控制变量的固定效应回归得出,基尼系数的收入弹性估计约为0.4,这表明收入水平越高,收入增长越快。对边际社会福利变化的估计因模式选择和收入平等的社会偏好而有很大差异。本文发现,平均收入每增加1欧元,由于收入不平等的增加,大约0 - 98%的收入收益可能会损失,其中结果强烈依赖于模型选择。因此,运输政策的间接收入效益可以正确估计或忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信