Second-Life Evaluation of Li-Ion Battery Graphite after Separation and Pre- and Postpurification Treatments of Black Mass

Elmira Pajootan*, Florence Perrin-Sarazin, Gabriela Mateevici, Mathieu Toupin, Ovidiu Mihai, Brad Methven, Patricia Grinberg, Oltion Kodra and Régis Chenitz*, 
{"title":"Second-Life Evaluation of Li-Ion Battery Graphite after Separation and Pre- and Postpurification Treatments of Black Mass","authors":"Elmira Pajootan*,&nbsp;Florence Perrin-Sarazin,&nbsp;Gabriela Mateevici,&nbsp;Mathieu Toupin,&nbsp;Ovidiu Mihai,&nbsp;Brad Methven,&nbsp;Patricia Grinberg,&nbsp;Oltion Kodra and Régis Chenitz*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acssusresmgt.5c0001010.1021/acssusresmgt.5c00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study assessed the viability of using two types of prepurified recycled graphite derived from spent battery materials, namely, black mass (BM), and compared their effectiveness to that of virgin battery-grade commercial natural graphite (NG). The first type of recycled graphite, prepurified carbon residue (PCR), was obtained through reductive acid leaching and thermomechanochemical processes with a carbon content of 97.6%. The second type, prepurified concentrate (PConcentrate), was produced via thermal-assisted flotation and thermomechanochemical processes, with a carbon content of 98.6%. Both types of recycled graphite, PCR and PConcentrate, underwent further purification using either an ultrahigh-temperature (UHT) approach or a thermochlorine treatment (TCT). These were followed by an amorphous carbon coating process to meet the graphite specifications for battery use. The structural analyses confirmed that both PCR and PConcentrate met the specifications for battery-grade graphite after purification and carbon coating. The electrochemical assessments showed that cells with recycled graphite, PConcentrate-TCT and PCR-TCT, exhibited specific capacities of 99 and 96 mAh/g, respectively, comparable to 99 mAh/g achieved by cells with commercial NG at a 2C rate. Additionally, after 250 charge/discharge cycles at 1C, cells with recycled graphite retained about 86% capacity, surpassing the 75% retention of cells with a commercial NG anode. Our results concluded that overall, spent graphite sourced and extracted from BM by flotation resulted in superior electrochemical performances. Moreover, graphite purified under UHT exhibited superior cyclability compared to TCT, while TCT purification resulted in higher specific capacity of the electrodes.</p><p >This research recycles graphite from spent lithium-ion batteries─currently considered waste─through innovative processes, achieving a performance comparable to that of virgin materials and promoting sustainable resource use in battery manufacturing.</p>","PeriodicalId":100015,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Resource Management","volume":"2 4","pages":"632–641 632–641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acssusresmgt.5c00010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssusresmgt.5c00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the viability of using two types of prepurified recycled graphite derived from spent battery materials, namely, black mass (BM), and compared their effectiveness to that of virgin battery-grade commercial natural graphite (NG). The first type of recycled graphite, prepurified carbon residue (PCR), was obtained through reductive acid leaching and thermomechanochemical processes with a carbon content of 97.6%. The second type, prepurified concentrate (PConcentrate), was produced via thermal-assisted flotation and thermomechanochemical processes, with a carbon content of 98.6%. Both types of recycled graphite, PCR and PConcentrate, underwent further purification using either an ultrahigh-temperature (UHT) approach or a thermochlorine treatment (TCT). These were followed by an amorphous carbon coating process to meet the graphite specifications for battery use. The structural analyses confirmed that both PCR and PConcentrate met the specifications for battery-grade graphite after purification and carbon coating. The electrochemical assessments showed that cells with recycled graphite, PConcentrate-TCT and PCR-TCT, exhibited specific capacities of 99 and 96 mAh/g, respectively, comparable to 99 mAh/g achieved by cells with commercial NG at a 2C rate. Additionally, after 250 charge/discharge cycles at 1C, cells with recycled graphite retained about 86% capacity, surpassing the 75% retention of cells with a commercial NG anode. Our results concluded that overall, spent graphite sourced and extracted from BM by flotation resulted in superior electrochemical performances. Moreover, graphite purified under UHT exhibited superior cyclability compared to TCT, while TCT purification resulted in higher specific capacity of the electrodes.

This research recycles graphite from spent lithium-ion batteries─currently considered waste─through innovative processes, achieving a performance comparable to that of virgin materials and promoting sustainable resource use in battery manufacturing.

黑质分离前后处理对锂离子电池石墨二次寿命的影响
本研究评估了使用两种从废旧电池材料中提取的预纯化再生石墨的可行性,即黑团(BM),并将其有效性与原始电池级商业天然石墨(NG)进行了比较。通过还原酸浸和热化学工艺得到了第一种再生石墨,预纯化碳渣(PCR),碳含量为97.6%。通过热助浮选和热化学工艺制备了第二种预纯化精矿(p精矿),其含碳量为98.6%。两种类型的再生石墨,PCR和PConcentrate,使用超高温(UHT)方法或热氯处理(TCT)进一步纯化。随后是非晶碳涂层工艺,以满足电池使用的石墨规格。结构分析证实PCR和PConcentrate经过纯化和碳包覆后均符合电池级石墨的要求。电化学评价表明,再生石墨电池pconcentre - tct和PCR-TCT的比容量分别为99和96 mAh/g,与商用NG电池在2C速率下达到的99 mAh/g相当。此外,在1C条件下进行250次充放电循环后,使用再生石墨的电池保留了约86%的容量,超过了使用商用NG阳极的电池保留了75%的容量。结果表明,从BM中浮选提取的废石墨具有优异的电化学性能。此外,与TCT相比,UHT纯化的石墨具有更好的可循环性,而TCT纯化导致电极的比容量更高。这项研究通过创新工艺从废锂离子电池(目前被认为是废物)中回收石墨,实现了与原始材料相当的性能,并促进了电池制造中的可持续资源利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信