Circular Economy in Swiss Food Sidestreams: A CO2 Footprint Analysis

Mohammad Peydayesh*,  and , Antonia L. Bieri, 
{"title":"Circular Economy in Swiss Food Sidestreams: A CO2 Footprint Analysis","authors":"Mohammad Peydayesh*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Antonia L. Bieri,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c0047610.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this study, we surveyed and analyzed 27 Swiss food companies to assess their generation and valorization of six specific sidestreams: whey, soy whey and okara, potato peelings, bovine blood, poultry feathers, and rapeseed and sunflower cake. These residual materials are consistently produced in large quantities during food processing. Our data reveal that most sidestreams are currently used for biogas and animal feed, with human nutrition primarily limited to whey from cheese production. We assessed the CO<sub>2</sub> footprint of four valorization scenarios using data from existing literature, e.g., landfilling, animal feed, bioplastics, and biogas production within the food waste hierarchy. Landfilling and bioplastics had the highest emissions, at 252 and 228 kg CO<sub>2</sub> per ton of sidestream, while animal feed and biogas had the lowest at 87 and 13 kg CO<sub>2</sub>. However, bioplastics provide environmental benefits by replacing conventional plastics and reducing reliance on fossil fuels, offering additional CO<sub>2</sub> savings. Discussions with companies revealed growing interest in sidestream valorization but also highlighted challenges such as perishability and production structures, underscoring the need for improved management, valorization pathways, and economic considerations. Overall, this work paves the way for more circular practices in the food industry, reducing waste and fostering eco-friendly innovations.</p>","PeriodicalId":100015,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Resource Management","volume":"2 4","pages":"581–593 581–593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we surveyed and analyzed 27 Swiss food companies to assess their generation and valorization of six specific sidestreams: whey, soy whey and okara, potato peelings, bovine blood, poultry feathers, and rapeseed and sunflower cake. These residual materials are consistently produced in large quantities during food processing. Our data reveal that most sidestreams are currently used for biogas and animal feed, with human nutrition primarily limited to whey from cheese production. We assessed the CO2 footprint of four valorization scenarios using data from existing literature, e.g., landfilling, animal feed, bioplastics, and biogas production within the food waste hierarchy. Landfilling and bioplastics had the highest emissions, at 252 and 228 kg CO2 per ton of sidestream, while animal feed and biogas had the lowest at 87 and 13 kg CO2. However, bioplastics provide environmental benefits by replacing conventional plastics and reducing reliance on fossil fuels, offering additional CO2 savings. Discussions with companies revealed growing interest in sidestream valorization but also highlighted challenges such as perishability and production structures, underscoring the need for improved management, valorization pathways, and economic considerations. Overall, this work paves the way for more circular practices in the food industry, reducing waste and fostering eco-friendly innovations.

Abstract Image

瑞士食品侧流的循环经济:二氧化碳足迹分析
在这项研究中,我们调查和分析了27家瑞士食品公司,以评估他们对六种特定侧流的产生和增值:乳清、大豆乳清和卡拉、土豆皮、牛血、家禽羽毛、油菜籽和向日葵蛋糕。这些残留物质在食品加工过程中持续大量产生。我们的数据显示,大多数侧流目前用于沼气和动物饲料,人类营养主要限于奶酪生产中的乳清。我们利用现有文献中的数据评估了四种增值情景的二氧化碳足迹,例如垃圾填埋、动物饲料、生物塑料和食物垃圾等级中的沼气生产。垃圾填埋和生物塑料的排放量最高,分别为每吨侧流252公斤和228公斤二氧化碳,而动物饲料和沼气的排放量最低,分别为87公斤和13公斤二氧化碳。然而,生物塑料通过取代传统塑料和减少对化石燃料的依赖提供了环境效益,提供了额外的二氧化碳节约。与公司的讨论表明,人们对侧流估值的兴趣日益浓厚,但同时也强调了诸如易腐性和生产结构等挑战,强调了改进管理、估值途径和经济考虑的必要性。总的来说,这项工作为食品行业更多的循环实践铺平了道路,减少了浪费,促进了环保创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信