A multiple-stakeholder view of open and user innovation: Systematic review and future research agenda

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Keith Marion Smith, Matthew S. O’Hern, Mason R. Jenkins, Paul W. Fombelle, Charles H. Noble
{"title":"A multiple-stakeholder view of open and user innovation: Systematic review and future research agenda","authors":"Keith Marion Smith, Matthew S. O’Hern, Mason R. Jenkins, Paul W. Fombelle, Charles H. Noble","doi":"10.1007/s11747-025-01092-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The open and user innovation (OUI) literature indicates that a variety of actors can play pivotal roles in the innovation process, but to date, many of these roles are under researched and poorly understood. Through a multiple stakeholder view combined with a systematic review of the OUI literature, we identify three key stakeholder roles (creator, contributor, customer) and three separate types of actors (individuals, firms, groups) to create a 3 × 3 OUI Stakeholder Matrix typology. This matrix encompasses the major stakeholders found in the OUI literature and is designed to foster closer collaboration between open innovation and user innovation scholars. Specifically, this article prioritizes identifying and understanding overlooked innovation stakeholders to clarify how their activities might create value for both customers and firms. The authors conclude by developing a series of actionable research questions centered on four primary themes that relate to stakeholder power, stakeholder role transitions and multi-role stakeholders, firms’ beliefs around what drives value in an OUI initiative, and the possible emergence of new stakeholders in OUI programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-025-01092-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The open and user innovation (OUI) literature indicates that a variety of actors can play pivotal roles in the innovation process, but to date, many of these roles are under researched and poorly understood. Through a multiple stakeholder view combined with a systematic review of the OUI literature, we identify three key stakeholder roles (creator, contributor, customer) and three separate types of actors (individuals, firms, groups) to create a 3 × 3 OUI Stakeholder Matrix typology. This matrix encompasses the major stakeholders found in the OUI literature and is designed to foster closer collaboration between open innovation and user innovation scholars. Specifically, this article prioritizes identifying and understanding overlooked innovation stakeholders to clarify how their activities might create value for both customers and firms. The authors conclude by developing a series of actionable research questions centered on four primary themes that relate to stakeholder power, stakeholder role transitions and multi-role stakeholders, firms’ beliefs around what drives value in an OUI initiative, and the possible emergence of new stakeholders in OUI programs.

开放和用户创新的多利益相关者观点:系统回顾和未来研究议程
开放和用户创新(OUI)文献表明,各种参与者可以在创新过程中发挥关键作用,但迄今为止,其中许多角色的研究和理解不足。通过多利益相关者的观点结合对OUI文献的系统回顾,我们确定了三个关键的利益相关者角色(创造者、贡献者、客户)和三种不同类型的参与者(个人、公司、团体),以创建一个3x3的OUI利益相关者矩阵类型。该矩阵包含了OUI文献中发现的主要利益相关者,旨在促进开放创新和用户创新学者之间更密切的合作。具体来说,本文优先识别和理解被忽视的创新利益相关者,以澄清他们的活动如何为客户和公司创造价值。作者最后提出了一系列可操作的研究问题,主要围绕四个主题:利益相关者权力、利益相关者角色转换和多角色利益相关者、企业对驱动OUI计划价值的信念,以及OUI计划中可能出现的新利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信