Development of a simplified smell test to identify Parkinson’s disease using multiple cohorts, machine learning and item response theory

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Juan Li, Kelsey Grimes, Joseph Saade, Julianna J. Tomlinson, Tiago A. Mestre, Sebastian Schade, Sandrina Weber, Mohammed Dakna, Tamara Wicke, Elisabeth Lang, Claudia Trenkwalder, Natalina Salmaso, Andrew Frank, Tim Ramsay, Douglas Manuel, Brit Mollenhauer, Michael G. Schlossmacher
{"title":"Development of a simplified smell test to identify Parkinson’s disease using multiple cohorts, machine learning and item response theory","authors":"Juan Li, Kelsey Grimes, Joseph Saade, Julianna J. Tomlinson, Tiago A. Mestre, Sebastian Schade, Sandrina Weber, Mohammed Dakna, Tamara Wicke, Elisabeth Lang, Claudia Trenkwalder, Natalina Salmaso, Andrew Frank, Tim Ramsay, Douglas Manuel, Brit Mollenhauer, Michael G. Schlossmacher","doi":"10.1038/s41531-025-00904-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To develop a simplified smell test for identifying patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), we reevaluated the Sniffin’-Sticks-Identification-Test (SST-ID) and University-of-Pennsylvania-Smell-Identification-Test (UPSIT), using three case-control studies. These included 301 patients with PD or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), 68 subjects with multiple-system atrophy (MSA) or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and 281 healthy controls (HC). Scents were ranked by area-under-the-curve values for group classification and results leveraged by 8 published studies with 5853 individuals. PD/DLB patients showed markedly worse olfaction than controls, whereas scores for MSA/PSP subjects were intermediate. We identified and validated a subset of 7 shared odorants that performed similarly to the traditional 16-scent SST-ID and 40-scent UPSIT tests in distinguishing PD/DLB from HC. There, the identification of 4 or fewer scents out of 7 served as an effective cut-off between the two groups. We also identified a critical role for distractors (from correct answers) and age on olfaction performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19706,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Parkinson's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-00904-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To develop a simplified smell test for identifying patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), we reevaluated the Sniffin’-Sticks-Identification-Test (SST-ID) and University-of-Pennsylvania-Smell-Identification-Test (UPSIT), using three case-control studies. These included 301 patients with PD or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), 68 subjects with multiple-system atrophy (MSA) or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and 281 healthy controls (HC). Scents were ranked by area-under-the-curve values for group classification and results leveraged by 8 published studies with 5853 individuals. PD/DLB patients showed markedly worse olfaction than controls, whereas scores for MSA/PSP subjects were intermediate. We identified and validated a subset of 7 shared odorants that performed similarly to the traditional 16-scent SST-ID and 40-scent UPSIT tests in distinguishing PD/DLB from HC. There, the identification of 4 or fewer scents out of 7 served as an effective cut-off between the two groups. We also identified a critical role for distractors (from correct answers) and age on olfaction performance.

Abstract Image

利用多队列、机器学习和项目反应理论开发一种简化的嗅觉测试,以识别帕金森病
为了开发一种用于识别帕金森病(PD)患者的简化嗅觉测试,我们重新评估了嗅探棒识别测试(SST-ID)和宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT),使用三个病例对照研究。其中包括301名PD或伴路易体痴呆(DLB)患者,68名多系统萎缩(MSA)或进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)患者,以及281名健康对照(HC)。根据曲线下面积值对气味进行分组分类,并根据8项已发表的研究结果对5853个人进行了排名。PD/DLB患者的嗅觉表现明显差于对照组,而MSA/PSP患者的得分则处于中等水平。我们确定并验证了7种共享气味的子集,这些气味与传统的16种气味的SST-ID和40种气味的UPSIT测试在区分PD/DLB和HC方面的表现相似。在那里,识别出7种气味中的4种或更少的气味作为两组之间的有效分界点。我们还确定了干扰因素(来自正确答案)和年龄对嗅觉表现的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Parkinson's Disease
NPJ Parkinson's Disease Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
156
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Parkinson's Disease is a comprehensive open access journal that covers a wide range of research areas related to Parkinson's disease. It publishes original studies in basic science, translational research, and clinical investigations. The journal is dedicated to advancing our understanding of Parkinson's disease by exploring various aspects such as anatomy, etiology, genetics, cellular and molecular physiology, neurophysiology, epidemiology, and therapeutic development. By providing free and immediate access to the scientific and Parkinson's disease community, npj Parkinson's Disease promotes collaboration and knowledge sharing among researchers and healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信