Post-Operative Pain After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery (POPPOP): A Double Blind Randomised Multicentre Study to Assess the Effect of Local Anaesthesia During Vaginal Hysterectomy

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gans Thiagamoorthy, Anu Dua, George Araklitis, Rayan Mohamed-Ahmed, Jassimran Bansal, Faisal Karim, Cathy Davis, Rufus Cartwright, Vik Khullar, Aethele Khunda, Sushma Srikrishna, Dudley Robinson, Linda Cardozo
{"title":"Post-Operative Pain After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery (POPPOP): A Double Blind Randomised Multicentre Study to Assess the Effect of Local Anaesthesia During Vaginal Hysterectomy","authors":"Gans Thiagamoorthy,&nbsp;Anu Dua,&nbsp;George Araklitis,&nbsp;Rayan Mohamed-Ahmed,&nbsp;Jassimran Bansal,&nbsp;Faisal Karim,&nbsp;Cathy Davis,&nbsp;Rufus Cartwright,&nbsp;Vik Khullar,&nbsp;Aethele Khunda,&nbsp;Sushma Srikrishna,&nbsp;Dudley Robinson,&nbsp;Linda Cardozo","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.18162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare local anaesthetic with adrenaline (LAA) with normal saline for hydrodissection at vaginal hysterectomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A double-blind, two parallel group multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) was planned.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>217 women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy were screened in the five participating centres between March 2015 and December 2018.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>156 patients were recruited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients were randomised to Bupivacaine 0.25%/0.5% with adrenaline 1:200000 vesus normal saline. They completed baseline ‘pre-operation’, ‘same day 3–6 h post-op’ and ‘morning after surgery’ short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SFMcGill).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Primary endpoint was post-operative pain measured using SFMcGill. Secondary endpoints included estimated blood loss (EBL), ease of dissection, severity of ooze, change in pre- and post-operative haemoglobin, operating time, duration of inpatient stay and incidence of post-operative morbidity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no demographic differences between the groups. LAA was associated with significantly smaller increases in pain scores compared to placebo, both between pre-operative and same-day post-operative (7.105 <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and to the next day post-operative (1.334 <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n \n <p>Use of placebo infiltrate was associated with increased intra-operative bleeding (difference in EBL 110 mL <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), increased severity of ooze (VAS difference 5.01 <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and more difficult dissection (VAS difference 2.96 <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were no differences in pre-operative or post-operative measures of Hb, PCV, or post-operative analgesia (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). There were significantly more complications in the placebo arm (5 vs. 0, <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This multicentre-RCT demonstrated the value of LAA compared to normal saline as a paracervical infiltrate during vaginal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia: reduced intra-operative blood loss, improved ease of dissection, decreased same and next day pain scores and complications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 9","pages":"1212-1219"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.18162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare local anaesthetic with adrenaline (LAA) with normal saline for hydrodissection at vaginal hysterectomy.

Design

A double-blind, two parallel group multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) was planned.

Setting

217 women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy were screened in the five participating centres between March 2015 and December 2018.

Population

156 patients were recruited.

Methods

Patients were randomised to Bupivacaine 0.25%/0.5% with adrenaline 1:200000 vesus normal saline. They completed baseline ‘pre-operation’, ‘same day 3–6 h post-op’ and ‘morning after surgery’ short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SFMcGill).

Main Outcome Measures

Primary endpoint was post-operative pain measured using SFMcGill. Secondary endpoints included estimated blood loss (EBL), ease of dissection, severity of ooze, change in pre- and post-operative haemoglobin, operating time, duration of inpatient stay and incidence of post-operative morbidity.

Results

There were no demographic differences between the groups. LAA was associated with significantly smaller increases in pain scores compared to placebo, both between pre-operative and same-day post-operative (7.105 p < 0.001) and to the next day post-operative (1.334 p < 0.001).

Use of placebo infiltrate was associated with increased intra-operative bleeding (difference in EBL 110 mL p < 0.001), increased severity of ooze (VAS difference 5.01 p < 0.001), and more difficult dissection (VAS difference 2.96 p < 0.001). There were no differences in pre-operative or post-operative measures of Hb, PCV, or post-operative analgesia (p > 0.05). There were significantly more complications in the placebo arm (5 vs. 0, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

This multicentre-RCT demonstrated the value of LAA compared to normal saline as a paracervical infiltrate during vaginal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia: reduced intra-operative blood loss, improved ease of dissection, decreased same and next day pain scores and complications.

盆腔器官脱垂术后疼痛(POPPOP):一项评估阴道子宫切除术中局部麻醉效果的双盲随机多中心研究
目的:比较肾上腺素局部麻醉与生理盐水在阴道子宫切除术中的应用效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信